S. Artesian (sartes...@earthlink.net) wrote on 2009-08-31 at 15:24:56 in
about Re: [Marxism] China investing heavily in infrastructure: Railway:
I didn't provide any aggregates, I used Lukos.
which are not mine, but the statistics of the UIC, provided by the railway
companies
S. Artesian (sartes...@earthlink.net) wrote on 2009-08-31 at 21:33:34 in
about Re: [Marxism] China investing heavily in infrastructure: Railway:
Does it include passenger operations? Because China's Rail Knowledge
magazine reports 77,000 KM of total track in China, not 60,000 for 2006
Willms lueko.wil...@t-online.de
To: David Schanoes sartes...@earthlink.net
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 2:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Marxism] China investing heavily in infrastructure: Railway
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying
S. Artesian (sartes...@earthlink.net) wrote on 2009-09-01 at 11:43:26 in
about Re: [Marxism] China investing heavily in infrastructure: Railway:
Miles of roadway excludes yard tracks and sidings, and does not reflect
the fact that a mile of road may include two, three, or more parallel
Michael Perelman (mich...@ecst.csuchico.edu) wrote on 2009-08-30 at
18:53:48 in about [Marxism] railroads:
In China, I gave 2 different talks about 150 -200 miles away from where I
was staying in Beijing and Shanghai. The trips took less than 2 hours;
very comfortable. I don't know
S. Artesian (sartes...@earthlink.net) wrote on 2009-08-31 at 09:32:21
in
about Re: [Marxism] China investing heavily in infrastructure:
Railway
(was:railroads):
As for China's high speed trainsets-- look what you wrote: bogies [we call
them trucks in the US] and electric/electronics
David, on the aggregate data you gave, were you lumping together
freight human transport? If so, some of the data might be
misleading.
One other anecdote: I see railroad track quite often when I travel
around the US. I did not recall seing any railroads or even track
outside of the train
S. Artesian (sartes...@earthlink.net) wrote on 2009-08-31 at 13:01:39 in
about Re: [Marxism] China investing heavily in infrastructure: Railway:
So let's look at this, China's network is 60,809 km vs the US 192, 123km.
China with 2,075,000 employees vs 164,000
[149,000 Class 1, 110
Luko...comparing the basic productivity of Chinese rail to US rail
is...weird. Why? Because the US doesn't have a rail system that is
particularly good, not when our highways are the main transport mode
for most things, including people. I would like to see a comparison with
*European* rail
productivity numbers. If you can't provide
those, at least spare us the guesses and the possibilities
- Original Message -
From: Lüko Willms lueko.wil...@t-online.de
To: David Schanoes sartes...@earthlink.net
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Marxism] China investing
why CSX
and NS went at it hammer and tongs in a bidding war for Conrail.
- Original Message -
From: nada dwalters...@gmail.com
To: David Schanoes sartes...@earthlink.net
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Marxism] China investing heavily in infrastructure: Railway
11 matches
Mail list logo
