SV: SV: M-TH: Re: Washington and Moscow

1999-11-24 Thread Bob Malecki
Rob writes! > Hi again, Bob, > > >What did ya do turn on the tele or look in your cristalball to predict this? > > You want a crystal ball? A few weeks down the track Grosny will be a hole > in the ground, Moscow will have reluctantly agreed to Wasington's 'moral' > pleas to withdraw their r

Re: SV: M-TH: Re: Washington and Moscow

1999-11-24 Thread Rob Schaap
Hi again, Bob, >What did ya do turn on the tele or look in your cristalball to predict this? You want a crystal ball? A few weeks down the track Grosny will be a hole in the ground, Moscow will have reluctantly agreed to Wasington's 'moral' pleas to withdraw their regulars, Bislan Gantamirov wi

SV: M-TH: Re: Washington and Moscow

1999-11-23 Thread Bob Malecki
Rob writes... > > Well, they might call it a win in the sense that NATO's silly slaughter in > Yugoslavia got carded as a win, I s'pose. There, as here, the actual > military campaign itself soon (and predictably) reached the point of > publicly apparent untenability, and an intrusion from out

SV: M-TH: Re: Washington and Moscow

1999-11-23 Thread Bob Malecki
Rob writes.. > G'day Thaxists, > > I don't think it matters whether trying to hang on to the prizes of past > expansionism constitutes an act of imperialism today or not, really. I > reckon we might be missing the point of all this! Um which prizes? And I think the point is the permanent rev