On 3/21/07, Eric Firing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Properties would be OK for 2.3; I was thinking we might want to use
them. When a getter and setter already exist, all it takes is the one
extra line of code, plus a suitable (unused) name for the property. I
decided not to pursue traits (if
On 3/21/07, John Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/21/07, Fernando Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And yes, properties are actually OK even with 2.2, so there's no
reason to avoid them (and they do provide a nicer, claner user API).
Decorators are 2.4-only though.
I'm not opposed to
