On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Andrew Straw wrote:
> John also suggested something like this. I don't think it's impossible,
> but it's outside the scope of the work I have done and beyond my
> immediate familiarity with the code base. I think it would involve
> looking at the tick label boundi
Gary Ruben wrote:
> This looks nice Andrew,
> I haven't tried it, but I wonder whether it's possible to add a
> keyword arg to suppress the 0's at the origin which are cut through by
> the axes in the zeroed case (and/or possibly shift the 0 on the
> horizontal axis left). The same thing is happ
This looks nice Andrew,
I haven't tried it, but I wonder whether it's possible to add a keyword
arg to suppress the 0's at the origin which are cut through by the axes
in the zeroed case (and/or possibly shift the 0 on the horizontal axis
left). The same thing is happening in the (1,2) case on t
Andrew Straw wrote:
> Also, I think that formula is only for normally distributed data. Which,
> especially if you're using boxplots, medians, and quartiles, may not be
> a valid assumption.
>
> Maybe we should at least raise a warning when someone uses notch=1. The
> current implementation seem
Andrew Straw wrote:
> Also, I think that formula is only for normally distributed data. Which,
> especially if you're using boxplots, medians, and quartiles, may not be
> a valid assumption.
>
> Maybe we should at least raise a warning when someone uses notch=1. The
> current implementation seem
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Glen Nixon wrote:
> Hi all. With some effort, I've managed to get matplotlib-0.99.1.1 with
> cygwin 1.7 (beta) on Windows 7. Since Google didn't turn up any
> instructions specifically addressing the problems I had, maybe these
> notes will be helpful to others.
Hi all. With some effort, I've managed to get matplotlib-0.99.1.1 with
cygwin 1.7 (beta) on Windows 7. Since Google didn't turn up any
instructions specifically addressing the problems I had, maybe these
notes will be helpful to others.
- System details
- Windows 7, 32-bit, AMD Athlon II
Andrew Straw writes:
> if you update from svn and play around with the demo, especially by
> panning and zooming in the figures, you'll get an idea of what I've
> done.
Neat! One small thing: in Figure 2 (the four subplots with differently
placed spines) if I zoom and pan subplot 4, I can make i
