Re: [matplotlib-devel] Transforms branch

2007-11-05 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 01:55:09PM -0400, Darren Dale wrote: > > Beta versions of tarballs are on > > http://code.enthought.com/downloads/source . I will make cleaner tarballs > > of the release that was done last week when I get back home. These > > tarballscan be used for eg packaging, or integra

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Transforms branch

2007-11-01 Thread Michael Droettboom
Thanks for the report. The mri_with_eeg.py demo is known not to work (I just haven't got around to updating it yet). As for speed, your results are consistent with mine. There is probably still some low hanging fruit to be optimized on the branch, but I expect that the new design will ultimat

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Transforms branch

2007-10-31 Thread Darren Dale
On Wednesday 31 October 2007 12:07:12 pm Gael Varoquaux wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 11:49:24AM -0400, Darren Dale wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 12:05:25PM -1000, Eric Firing wrote: > > >> When I go to the enthought web site, the most recent traits release I > > >> see is 1.1, from Augu

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Transforms branch

2007-10-31 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 12:05:25PM -1000, Eric Firing wrote: > When I go to the enthought web site, the most recent traits release I > see is 1.1, from August 2006. That doesn't make me optimistic about > traits as an external dependency any time soon. That's because the website is unmaintained

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Transforms branch

2007-10-31 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 11:49:24AM -0400, Darren Dale wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 12:05:25PM -1000, Eric Firing wrote: > >> When I go to the enthought web site, the most recent traits release I > >> see is 1.1, from August 2006. That doesn't make me optimistic about > >> traits as an exter

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Transforms branch

2007-10-31 Thread Darren Dale
On Monday 29 October 2007 03:29:17 pm Michael Droettboom wrote: > As some of you probably know, I've been working on a fairly major > refactoring of matplotlib. It's now getting to the point where I think > more people may want to check it out and kick the tires. It is > definitely not ready for

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Transforms branch

2007-10-30 Thread Darren Dale
On Tuesday 30 October 2007 11:07:32 am you wrote: > On 10/29/07, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Maybe we can consider switching to the traited config package after the > > potential merge. I have been running with it for quite a long time, and > > I think it would be a good time to do t

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Transforms branch

2007-10-30 Thread John Hunter
On 10/29/07, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe we can consider switching to the traited config package after the > potential merge. I have been running with it for quite a long time, and I think it would be a good time to do the switch. Michael's changes do not change much of the AP

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Transforms branch

2007-10-29 Thread Eric Firing
Darren Dale wrote: > > Maybe we can consider switching to the traited config package after the > potential merge. I have been running with it for quite a long time, and > haven't had any issues. Now that traits can be installed without any > additional dependencies, and enthought has been work

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Transforms branch

2007-10-29 Thread Darren Dale
On Monday 29 October 2007 03:29:17 pm Michael Droettboom wrote: > As some of you probably know, I've been working on a fairly major > refactoring of matplotlib. It's now getting to the point where I think > more people may want to check it out and kick the tires. It is > definitely not ready for

[matplotlib-devel] Transforms branch

2007-10-29 Thread Michael Droettboom
As some of you probably know, I've been working on a fairly major refactoring of matplotlib. It's now getting to the point where I think more people may want to check it out and kick the tires. It is definitely not ready for real work -- I guarantee the first thing you try will break ;) However,