On Monday 02 June 2008 08:33:55 Michael Droettboom wrote:
Darren Dale wrote:
On Saturday 31 May 2008 11:44:34 pm Darren Dale wrote:
On Saturday 31 May 2008 10:19:47 pm John Hunter wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Fernando Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tracked this down by checking
On Monday 02 June 2008 09:12:45 Michael Droettboom wrote:
John Hunter wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Darren Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'll be working on converting docstrings to rest this weekend. Should
any of this be done on the branch? Or should we just focus on the trunk?
Hi all
I only read this thread today, and see that we have been battling many
of the same challenges in our documentation efforts. I am glad to see
that you are making such good progress!
2008/6/1 John Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I just realized, though, that I should probably be striving to
Darren Dale wrote:
On Saturday 31 May 2008 11:44:34 pm Darren Dale wrote:
On Saturday 31 May 2008 10:19:47 pm John Hunter wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Fernando Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tracked this down by checking the contents of the generated
John Hunter wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Darren Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll be working on converting docstrings to rest this weekend. Should any of
this be done on the branch? Or should we just focus on the trunk?
As far as I am concerned, the documentation effort
On Saturday 31 May 2008 11:44:34 pm Darren Dale wrote:
On Saturday 31 May 2008 10:19:47 pm John Hunter wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Fernando Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't know if you are so in the middle of things that you'd rather
not get bug reports on this for a
On Sunday 01 June 2008 12:53:48 am John Hunter wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Tony Yu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the new color scheme on the website. Since you asked for
criticism, though, I'm not a fan of the blue matplotlib in the logo (on
the website, the attached logo is
On Saturday 31 May 2008 10:45:34 pm John Hunter wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Darren Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just realized, though, that I should probably be striving to conform
with the standard that the numpy and scipy folks put together:
On Jun 1, 2008, at 4:30 AM, John Hunter wrote:
Let me know what you think...
Generally, I like the logo, and think it is a *huge* improvement on
the old one.
Two suggestions:
1. The original new logo was done in a Helvetica medium font, which is
much nicer for this type of logo. (See
On Jun 1, 2008, at 6:00 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
On Sunday 01 June 2008 12:53:48 am John Hunter wrote:
We're definitely interested. Try checking out the htdocs svn
repository.
Hmm, the README file says I need all the backends working. I don't
think I want to try that on my Mac. I'll try
On Sunday 01 June 2008 10:23:47 am Tony Yu wrote:
On Jun 1, 2008, at 6:00 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
I was intending to write the list and ask if anyone was interested
in playing
with CSS to customize the looks of the new sphinx-based
documentation effort.
I'm really happy to hear that
I'm not sure either, it was something simple like having problems
building and John suggesting that I blow away the previous
installation. But I indeed did eventually mail the doughnut.
Perry
On May 31, 2008, at 10:35 PM, John Hunter wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Darren Dale
On Jun 1, 2008, at 9:47 AM, Rob Hetland wrote:
2. I like the figure to the side (and agree that there should be
only one), but it seems that polar plots are more rarely used than
normal x-y plots. Perhaps an x-y plot (the histogram, for example)
would be better advertising.
I was the
I'll be working on converting docstrings to rest this weekend. Should any of
this be done on the branch? Or should we just focus on the trunk?
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R)
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Darren Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll be working on converting docstrings to rest this weekend. Should any of
this be done on the branch? Or should we just focus on the trunk?
As far as I am concerned, the documentation effort is for the trunk.
The only
On Saturday 31 May 2008 12:36:11 pm John Hunter wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Darren Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'll be working on converting docstrings to rest this weekend. Should any
of this be done on the branch? Or should we just focus on the trunk?
As far as I am
On Saturday 31 May 2008 4:14:39 pm Darren Dale wrote:
On Saturday 31 May 2008 12:36:11 pm John Hunter wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Darren Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'll be working on converting docstrings to rest this weekend. Should
any of this be done on the branch? Or
Hey folks,
I'm super excited about this, so I decided to give it a quick test run
with current trunk SVN. Running ./make.py in the doc/ directory
worked for a while, and then stalled at:
Sphinx v0.3, building latex
trying to load pickled env... done
building [latex]: all documents
updating
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Tony Yu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I played around with the script, but in the process I ended up rewriting it
a bunch. I'm sure I've violated come coding guidelines along the way; my
apologies.
And I made several changes -- mainly to simplify the logo. My wife
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Fernando Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if you are so in the middle of things that you'd rather
not get bug reports on this for a while. If that's the case I'll wait
until the dust settles a bit.
Well, we definitely want our docs to build so
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Tony Yu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the new color scheme on the website. Since you asked for criticism,
though, I'm not a fan of the blue matplotlib in the logo (on the website,
the attached logo is actually different). I think black or a dark gray looks
My 2 cents:
I think it looks better if you reduce the number of histogram bins from
50 down to 15 or 20.
Gary R.
John Hunter wrote:
I played around with this a bit this morning -- it may be too busy for
your OS X sensibilities, but let me know if you think think this is an
approach wotrh
On May 25, 2008, at 12:13 PM, John Hunter wrote:
I played around with this a bit this morning -- it may be too busy for
your OS X sensibilities, but let me know if you think think this is an
approach wotrh pursuing. I've added the mathtext background and a few
axes and there are a few more
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 08:45:02PM -0500, John Hunter wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Paul Kienzle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks okay in Firefox 2.0.0.14 (though it did complain about missing the
mathml
fonts).
IE 7 displays the xml tree.
I don't mind using latex for
On Thursday 22 May 2008 10:10:13 pm John Hunter wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Darren Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just committed the beginnings of a Sphinx-based documentation to svn.
It includes a section explaining how to get up and running with sphinx,
its *really easy*:
Michael Droettboom wrote:
Secondly, the ipython console sessions aren't getting syntax highlighted
-- it would be nice if they did, particularly to indicate input vs.
output. I'll volunteer to look into this -- I've done some pygments
customization work in the past and maybe it won't be
On Friday 23 May 2008 10:54:52 am John Hunter wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Michael Droettboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I would prefer to see all the names in monospaced type (I
find it much more readable), but the additional markup may be somewhat at
odds with keeping
On Friday 23 May 2008 10:56:47 am Michael Droettboom wrote:
Michael Droettboom wrote:
Secondly, the ipython console sessions aren't getting syntax highlighted
-- it would be nice if they did, particularly to indicate input vs.
output. I'll volunteer to look into this -- I've done some
On Friday 23 May 2008 03:02:55 pm John Hunter wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:54 AM, John Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It certainly would make the docs more useful to be able to link to the
class and function references. Argg. I guess I'll just have to give
up my desire to have clean
On Friday 23 May 2008 04:34:11 pm John Hunter wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Darren Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
commit yout customizing.txt?
done.
I just discovered l
# The name of an image file (within the static path) to place at the
top of # the sidebar.
On Friday 23 May 2008 6:06:30 pm Eric Firing wrote:
xcorr(*args, **kwargs)
XCORR(x, y, normed=False, detrend=mlab.detrend_none,
usevlines=False, **kwargs):
Sorry I'm not helping yet, but while you are in the middle of all this,
please ditch the ugly and misleading Matlab-style
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Darren Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I have to break here for the weekend, I'll be back monday afternoon. Leave
some for me! (although I'll owe doughnut to whoever can fix the arrow
docstring).
I'll claim that doughnut.
This is a bit complicated. The problem
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 07:07:33 pm Gael Varoquaux wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:04:41PM -0500, bryce hendrix wrote:
How stable is the API? We (Enthought) use endo, a custom tool build on
top of docutils, to generate our docs currently. We have talked about
changing tools in the past,
I am planning on starting to overhaul the documentation using Sphinx next
week. I have been experimenting with Sphinx to create some documentation for
a project at work (http://dale.chess.cornell.edu/~darren/xpaxs/index.xml and
http://dale.chess.cornell.edu/~darren/temp/XPaXS.pdf). I'm really
On Thursday 22 May 2008 09:56:04 am John Hunter wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Darren Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am planning on starting to overhaul the documentation using Sphinx next
week. I have been experimenting with Sphinx to create some documentation
for a project at
On Thursday 22 May 2008 01:23:53 pm Michael Droettboom wrote:
Just something to keep in mind: many of the docstrings are pieced
together at import time (to avoid rewriting descriptions of common
parameters). Any tool that extracts docstrings by parsing Python rather
than importing Python may
On Thursday 22 May 2008 02:05:14 pm John Hunter wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Darren Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You're right, that sounds easier. Here's a taste, it has a bit taken from
the users guide, I marked up the CODING_GUIDE, and I used the autodoc
extension to
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 02:44:43PM -0400, Darren Dale wrote:
Here is the docstring for the texmanager module:
I saw this package for math markup mentioned in the docutils FAQ:
http://docutils.sourceforge.net/sandbox/jensj/latex_math/
It should allow you to include latex markup in the
I just committed the beginnings of a Sphinx-based documentation to svn. It
includes a section explaining how to get up and running with sphinx, its
*really easy*:
http://dale.chess.cornell.edu/~darren/temp/matplotlib/Users_Guide/documenting_mpl.xml
Here is the same documentation in plain text:
On Thursday 22 May 2008 5:03:31 pm Paul Kienzle wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 02:44:43PM -0400, Darren Dale wrote:
Here is the docstring for the texmanager module:
I saw this package for math markup mentioned in the docutils FAQ:
http://docutils.sourceforge.net/sandbox/jensj/latex_math/
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Darren Dale
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 6:15 AM
To: matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [matplotlib-devel] future of mpl documentation
I am planning on starting to overhaul the documentation using Sphinx
next
week. I have been experimenting with Sphinx
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:21 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jsMath!
http://www.math.union.edu/~dpvc/jsmath/
It's unfortunate that whenever LaTeX math on the web gets brought up, MathML
is what everyone thinks of.
I guess someone has to write the docutils code for it, though.
There was some discussion a while back concerning upcoming changes to the mpl
documentation: moving the docs into the trunk and updating the website. I
can't find the thread now, could anyone summarize the current thinking?
Ondrej Certik recently implemented a sphinx-based documentation for
For those of you wondering what is sphinx? this will save you a few
seconds of searching: http://sphinx.pocoo.org/
The output looks really nice.
Darren Dale wrote:
There was some discussion a while back concerning upcoming changes to the mpl
documentation: moving the docs into the trunk and
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Darren Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was some discussion a while back concerning upcoming changes to the mpl
documentation: moving the docs into the trunk and updating the website. I
can't find the thread now, could anyone summarize the current thinking?
Hey guys,
sorry for the silence, mostly on travel. I just wanted to mention
that the sphinx machinery seems quite nice, in particular it produces
both high-quality pdf and client-side searchable html. This is great,
because it measn that the entire doc set is automatically searchable
for the
Fernando Perez wrote:
Hey guys,
sorry for the silence, mostly on travel. I just wanted to mention
that the sphinx machinery seems quite nice, in particular it produces
both high-quality pdf and client-side searchable html. This is great,
because it measn that the entire doc set is
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:04:41PM -0500, bryce hendrix wrote:
How stable is the API? We (Enthought) use endo, a custom tool build on
top of docutils, to generate our docs currently. We have talked about
changing tools in the past, but the need to extend the tools to
understand Traits has
48 matches
Mail list logo
