On Monday 02 June 2008 09:12:45 Michael Droettboom wrote:
> John Hunter wrote:
> > On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >> I'll be working on converting docstrings to rest this weekend. Should
> >> any of this be done on the branch? Or should we just focus on t
On Monday 02 June 2008 08:33:55 Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Darren Dale wrote:
> > On Saturday 31 May 2008 11:44:34 pm Darren Dale wrote:
> >> On Saturday 31 May 2008 10:19:47 pm John Hunter wrote:
> >>> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > I tracked this down
Hi all
I only read this thread today, and see that we have been battling many
of the same challenges in our documentation efforts. I am glad to see
that you are making such good progress!
2008/6/1 John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I just realized, though, that I should probably be striving to
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree with John -- I think the documentation effort should be focused on
> the trunk. Now that we have (apparently) such a stable 0.91.3, hopefully
> the maintenance branch will be much less frequently modified anyw
John Hunter wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'll be working on converting docstrings to rest this weekend. Should any of
>> this be done on the branch? Or should we just focus on the trunk?
>>
>
> As far as I am concerned, the documentat
Darren Dale wrote:
> On Saturday 31 May 2008 11:44:34 pm Darren Dale wrote:
>
>> On Saturday 31 May 2008 10:19:47 pm John Hunter wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
> I tracked this down by checking the contents of the generated
> bu
On Jun 1, 2008, at 9:47 AM, Rob Hetland wrote:
>
> 2. I like the figure to the side (and agree that there should be
> only one), but it seems that polar plots are more rarely used than
> normal x-y plots. Perhaps an x-y plot (the histogram, for example)
> would be better advertising.
I was
I'm not sure either, it was something simple like having problems
building and John suggesting that I blow away the previous
installation. But I indeed did eventually mail the doughnut.
Perry
On May 31, 2008, at 10:35 PM, John Hunter wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Darren Dale
>
On Sunday 01 June 2008 10:23:47 am Tony Yu wrote:
> On Jun 1, 2008, at 6:00 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
> > I was intending to write the list and ask if anyone was interested
> > in playing
> > with CSS to customize the looks of the new sphinx-based
> > documentation effort.
> > I'm really happy to hear
On Jun 1, 2008, at 6:00 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Sunday 01 June 2008 12:53:48 am John Hunter wrote:
>>
>>
>> We're definitely interested. Try checking out the htdocs svn
>> repository.
Hmm, the README file says I need all the backends working. I don't
think I want to try that on my Mac. I'
On Jun 1, 2008, at 4:30 AM, John Hunter wrote:
> Let me know what you think...
Generally, I like the logo, and think it is a *huge* improvement on
the old one.
Two suggestions:
1. The original new logo was done in a Helvetica medium font, which is
much nicer for this type of logo. (See th
On Saturday 31 May 2008 10:45:34 pm John Hunter wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I just realized, though, that I should probably be striving to conform
> > with the standard that the numpy and scipy folks put together:
> > http://projects.scipy.o
On Saturday 31 May 2008 11:44:34 pm Darren Dale wrote:
> On Saturday 31 May 2008 10:19:47 pm John Hunter wrote:
> > On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > > I don't know if you are so in the middle of things that you'd rather
> > > not get bug reports on
On Sunday 01 June 2008 12:53:48 am John Hunter wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Tony Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I like the new color scheme on the website. Since you asked for
> > criticism, though, I'm not a fan of the blue "matplotlib" in the logo (on
> > the website, the attache
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Tony Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like the new color scheme on the website. Since you asked for criticism,
> though, I'm not a fan of the blue "matplotlib" in the logo (on the website,
> the attached logo is actually different). I think black or a dark gray l
On May 31, 2008, at 10:30 PM, John Hunter wrote:
>
> And I made several changes -- mainly to simplify the logo. My wife
> thought it looked busy, and she has better taste than I do, so I
> stripped it down a bunch and added the many small subplots as a
> sidebar on the right.
I agree, the strip
On Saturday 31 May 2008 10:19:47 pm John Hunter wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I don't know if you are so in the middle of things that you'd rather
> > not get bug reports on this for a while. If that's the case I'll wait
> > until the dust
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just realized, though, that I should probably be striving to conform with
> the standard that the numpy and scipy folks put together:
> http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/wiki/CodingStyleGuidelines and
> http://svn.scip
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Darren> I have to break here for the weekend, I'll be back monday afternoon.
Darren> Leave some for me! (although I'll owe doughnut to whoever can fix the
Darren> arrow docstring).
John> I'll claim that doughnut.
D
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Tony Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I played around with the script, but in the process I ended up rewriting it
> a bunch. I'm sure I've violated come coding guidelines along the way; my
> apologies.
And I made several changes -- mainly to simplify the logo. My
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if you are so in the middle of things that you'd rather
> not get bug reports on this for a while. If that's the case I'll wait
> until the dust settles a bit.
Well, we definitely want our docs to build so
Hey folks,
I'm super excited about this, so I decided to give it a quick test run
with current trunk SVN. Running ./make.py in the doc/ directory
worked for a while, and then stalled at:
Sphinx v0.3, building latex
trying to load pickled env... done
building [latex]: all documents
updating envi
On Saturday 31 May 2008 4:14:39 pm Darren Dale wrote:
> On Saturday 31 May 2008 12:36:11 pm John Hunter wrote:
> > On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > > I'll be working on converting docstrings to rest this weekend. Should
> > > any of this be done on the
On Friday 23 May 2008 7:54:27 pm John Hunter wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote
>
> > I have to break here for the weekend, I'll be back monday afternoon.
> > Leave some for me! (although I'll owe doughnut to whoever can fix the
> > arrow docstring).
>
On Saturday 31 May 2008 12:36:11 pm John Hunter wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I'll be working on converting docstrings to rest this weekend. Should any
> > of this be done on the branch? Or should we just focus on the trunk?
>
> As far as I am
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll be working on converting docstrings to rest this weekend. Should any of
> this be done on the branch? Or should we just focus on the trunk?
As far as I am concerned, the documentation effort is for the trunk.
The only r
I'll be working on converting docstrings to rest this weekend. Should any of
this be done on the branch? Or should we just focus on the trunk?
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) V
My 2 cents:
I think it looks better if you reduce the number of histogram bins from
50 down to 15 or 20.
Gary R.
John Hunter wrote:
> I played around with this a bit this morning -- it may be too busy for
> your OS X sensibilities, but let me know if you think think this is an
> approach wotrh pu
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Tony Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I must admit, I was a little worried when you suggested adding a big
> equation in the background, but I think you did a good job of making it look
> nice. Unfortunately, I get an error when I try to run the logo2 script:
I'm
On May 25, 2008, at 12:13 PM, John Hunter wrote:
I played around with this a bit this morning -- it may be too busy for
your OS X sensibilities, but let me know if you think think this is an
approach wotrh pursuing. I've added the mathtext background and a few
axes and there are a few more axe
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Tony Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if you were planning to accept submissions, but here's a logo
> with some of my favorite plots from examples.zip:
Submissions are extremely welcome, and I like the approach. I think
you might experiment with anot
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> I have to break here for the weekend, I'll be back monday afternoon. Leave
> some for me! (although I'll owe doughnut to whoever can fix the arrow
> docstring).
I'll claim that doughnut.
This is a bit complicated. The probl
On Friday 23 May 2008 6:06:30 pm Eric Firing wrote:
> > xcorr(*args, **kwargs)
> > XCORR(x, y, normed=False, detrend=mlab.detrend_none,
> > usevlines=False, **kwargs):
>
> Sorry I'm not helping yet, but while you are in the middle of all this,
> please ditch the ugly and misleading Matl
> xcorr(*args, **kwargs)
> XCORR(x, y, normed=False, detrend=mlab.detrend_none,
> usevlines=False, **kwargs):
Sorry I'm not helping yet, but while you are in the middle of all this,
please ditch the ugly and misleading Matlab-style capitalization of the
function names.
Thanks for a
On Friday 23 May 2008 04:57:24 pm John Hunter wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >> so I have to get to work creating a new cool mpl figure for the logo.
> >> Our old banner is so 70s.
> >
> > I wasn't going to say it... but yeah. :)
>
> Thanks for y
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> so I have to get to work creating a new cool mpl figure for the logo.
>> Our old banner is so 70s.
>
> I wasn't going to say it... but yeah. :)
Thanks for your sensitivity :-) I made that a long time ago when I was
really
On Friday 23 May 2008 04:34:11 pm John Hunter wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > commit yout customizing.txt?
>
> done.
>
> I just discovered l
>
>
> # The name of an image file (within the static path) to place at the
> top of # the sidebar.
>
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> commit yout customizing.txt?
done.
I just discovered l
# The name of an image file (within the static path) to place at the top of
# the sidebar.
#html_logo = 'logo.png'
so I have to get to work creating a n
On Friday 23 May 2008 04:12:51 pm John Hunter wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Friday 23 May 2008 03:02:55 pm John Hunter wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:54 AM, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > It certainly would make the do
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 23 May 2008 03:02:55 pm John Hunter wrote:
>> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:54 AM, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > It certainly would make the docs more useful to be able to link to the
>> > class and functi
On Friday 23 May 2008 03:02:55 pm John Hunter wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:54 AM, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It certainly would make the docs more useful to be able to link to the
> > class and function references. Argg. I guess I'll just have to give
> > up my desire to hav
On Friday 23 May 2008 03:02:55 pm John Hunter wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:54 AM, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It certainly would make the docs more useful to be able to link to the
> > class and function references. Argg. I guess I'll just have to give
> > up my desire to hav
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:54 AM, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It certainly would make the docs more useful to be able to link to the
> class and function references. Argg. I guess I'll just have to give
> up my desire to have clean ASCII here, since most people are going to
> read th
On Friday 23 May 2008 10:56:47 am Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Michael Droettboom wrote:
> > Secondly, the ipython console sessions aren't getting syntax highlighted
> > -- it would be nice if they did, particularly to indicate input vs.
> > output. I'll volunteer to look into this -- I've done som
On Friday 23 May 2008 10:54:52 am John Hunter wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Personally, I would prefer to see all the names in monospaced type (I
> > find it much more readable), but the additional markup may be somewhat at
> > odds with
John Hunter wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Personally, I would prefer to see all the names in monospaced type (I find
>> it much more readable), but the additional markup may be somewhat at odds
>> with keeping the original ReST sou
Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Secondly, the ipython console sessions aren't getting syntax highlighted
> -- it would be nice if they did, particularly to indicate input vs.
> output. I'll volunteer to look into this -- I've done some pygments
> customization work in the past and maybe it won't be
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally, I would prefer to see all the names in monospaced type (I find
> it much more readable), but the additional markup may be somewhat at odds
> with keeping the original ReST source clean. There are also two
On Thursday 22 May 2008 10:10:13 pm John Hunter wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I just committed the beginnings of a Sphinx-based documentation to svn.
> > It includes a section explaining how to get up and running with sphinx,
> > its *really e
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:34 AM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The cover page of the PDFs list John and Darren as authors. I think the
> docs (particularly the docstrings) have probably been written by a much
> larger community. If it's not practical to list all contributors (p
There are a couple of minor details about formatting that might be worth
working out up front before too much reST conversion begins:
How do we want to handle inline code names? For example, this passage
from the Artist API tutorial:
"The primitives represent the standard graphical objects
Hi Mike,
On Friday 23 May 2008 08:34:35 am Michael Droettboom wrote:
> These examples look great, Darren.
>
> One small detail:
>
> The cover page of the PDFs list John and Darren as authors. I think the
> docs (particularly the docstrings) have probably been written by a much
> larger community.
These examples look great, Darren.
One small detail:
The cover page of the PDFs list John and Darren as authors. I think the
docs (particularly the docstrings) have probably been written by a much
larger community. If it's not practical to list all contributors
(probably so given all of the
On Friday 23 May 2008 7:08:09 am Paul Kienzle wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 08:45:02PM -0500, John Hunter wrote:
> > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Paul Kienzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > It looks okay in Firefox 2.0.0.14 (though it did complain about missing
> > > the mathml fonts).
> >
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 08:45:02PM -0500, John Hunter wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Paul Kienzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It looks okay in Firefox 2.0.0.14 (though it did complain about missing the
> > mathml
> > fonts).
> >
> > IE 7 displays the xml tree.
>
> I don't mind us
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:21 PM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jsMath!
>
> http://www.math.union.edu/~dpvc/jsmath/
>
> It's unfortunate that whenever "LaTeX math on the web" gets brought up, MathML
> is what everyone thinks of.
>
> I guess someone has to write the docutils code for it
John Hunter wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Paul Kienzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It looks okay in Firefox 2.0.0.14 (though it did complain about missing the
>> mathml
>> fonts).
>>
>> IE 7 displays the xml tree.
>
> I don't mind using latex for math where is really helps but I
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just committed the beginnings of a Sphinx-based documentation to svn. It
> includes a section explaining how to get up and running with sphinx, its
> *really easy*:
Darren, thanks a lot for getting this going. I think thi
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Paul Kienzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks okay in Firefox 2.0.0.14 (though it did complain about missing the
> mathml
> fonts).
>
> IE 7 displays the xml tree.
I don't mind using latex for math where is really helps but I think we
should try to keep it t
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Ted Drain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Darren,
> I think this is a GREAT idea. I've been trying to free up some resources to
> work on a better MPL user's guide for our users this year. If I can swing
> it, perhaps we can help contribute some sections.
That would
ROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Darren Dale
> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 6:15 AM
> To: matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [matplotlib-devel] future of mpl documentation
>
> I am planning on starting to overhaul the documentation using
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 06:12:15PM -0400, Darren Dale wrote:
> http://dale.chess.cornell.edu/~darren/temp/XPaXS/reflectivity.xml#matrix-method
>
> There is a "show source" link on the left that shows the original ReST wource
> for the current page, here is the math markup:
>
> :math:`sin(x_n^2)`
On Thursday 22 May 2008 5:03:31 pm Paul Kienzle wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 02:44:43PM -0400, Darren Dale wrote:
> > Here is the docstring for the texmanager module:
>
> I saw this package for math markup mentioned in the docutils FAQ:
>
>http://docutils.sourceforge.net/sandbox/jensj/latex
I just committed the beginnings of a Sphinx-based documentation to svn. It
includes a section explaining how to get up and running with sphinx, its
*really easy*:
http://dale.chess.cornell.edu/~darren/temp/matplotlib/Users_Guide/documenting_mpl.xml
Here is the same documentation in plain text:
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 02:44:43PM -0400, Darren Dale wrote:
> Here is the docstring for the texmanager module:
I saw this package for math markup mentioned in the docutils FAQ:
http://docutils.sourceforge.net/sandbox/jensj/latex_math/
It should allow you to include latex markup in the docstr
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have a lot of flexibility here. I prefer to pull from a few smaller
> documents using rest include statements or table of contents directives.
> Ipython, on the other hand, has the whole guide included in one file.
I wou
On Thursday 22 May 2008 02:05:14 pm John Hunter wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > You're right, that sounds easier. Here's a taste, it has a bit taken from
> > the users guide, I marked up the CODING_GUIDE, and I used the autodoc
> > extension to
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're right, that sounds easier. Here's a taste, it has a bit taken from the
> users guide, I marked up the CODING_GUIDE, and I used the autodoc extension
> to document the API of texmanager and dviread:
How do you envisi
On Thursday 22 May 2008 01:23:53 pm Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Just something to keep in mind: many of the docstrings are pieced
> together at import time (to avoid rewriting descriptions of common
> parameters). Any tool that extracts docstrings by parsing Python rather
> than importing Python m
On Thursday 22 May 2008 09:56:04 am John Hunter wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I am planning on starting to overhaul the documentation using Sphinx next
> > week. I have been experimenting with Sphinx to create some documentation
> > for a proj
Just something to keep in mind: many of the docstrings are pieced
together at import time (to avoid rewriting descriptions of common
parameters). Any tool that extracts docstrings by parsing Python rather
than importing Python may choke on that approach.
Cheers,
Mike
-
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am planning on starting to overhaul the documentation using Sphinx next
> week. I have been experimenting with Sphinx to create some documentation for
> a project at work (http://dale.chess.cornell.edu/~darren/xpaxs/index.x
I am planning on starting to overhaul the documentation using Sphinx next
week. I have been experimenting with Sphinx to create some documentation for
a project at work (http://dale.chess.cornell.edu/~darren/xpaxs/index.xml and
http://dale.chess.cornell.edu/~darren/temp/XPaXS.pdf). I'm really im
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 07:07:33 pm Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:04:41PM -0500, bryce hendrix wrote:
> > How stable is the API? We (Enthought) use endo, a custom tool build on
> > top of docutils, to generate our docs currently. We have talked about
> > changing tools in the
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:04:41PM -0500, bryce hendrix wrote:
> How stable is the API? We (Enthought) use endo, a custom tool build on
> top of docutils, to generate our docs currently. We have talked about
> changing tools in the past, but the need to extend the tools to
> understand Traits ha
Fernando Perez wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> sorry for the silence, mostly on travel. I just wanted to mention
> that the sphinx machinery seems quite nice, in particular it produces
> both high-quality pdf and client-side searchable html. This is great,
> because it measn that the entire doc set is aut
Hey guys,
sorry for the silence, mostly on travel. I just wanted to mention
that the sphinx machinery seems quite nice, in particular it produces
both high-quality pdf and client-side searchable html. This is great,
because it measn that the entire doc set is automatically searchable
for the use
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There was some discussion a while back concerning upcoming changes to the mpl
> documentation: moving the docs into the trunk and updating the website. I
> can't find the thread now, could anyone summarize the current think
For those of you wondering "what is sphinx?" this will save you a few
seconds of searching: http://sphinx.pocoo.org/
The output looks really nice.
Darren Dale wrote:
> There was some discussion a while back concerning upcoming changes to the mpl
> documentation: moving the docs into the trunk an
There was some discussion a while back concerning upcoming changes to the mpl
documentation: moving the docs into the trunk and updating the website. I
can't find the thread now, could anyone summarize the current thinking?
Ondrej Certik recently implemented a sphinx-based documentation for ipyt
80 matches
Mail list logo
