Re: [matplotlib-devel] Usefulness of Travis-CI

2013-01-16 Thread Damon McDougall
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Todd wrote: > On Jan 16, 2013 9:30 AM, "Fernando Perez" wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Nelle Varoquaux >> wrote: >> >> > Last but not least, maybe we can see what numfocus has to offer. >> >> Absolutely! I'll be offline for two weeks, but others

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Usefulness of Travis-CI

2013-01-16 Thread Todd
On Jan 16, 2013 9:30 AM, "Fernando Perez" wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Nelle Varoquaux > wrote: > > > Last but not least, maybe we can see what numfocus has to offer. > > Absolutely! I'll be offline for two weeks, but others on the list can > certainly propose this to numfocus on

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Usefulness of Travis-CI

2013-01-16 Thread Ryan May
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Damon McDougall wrote: > Hi all, > > Recently, it has become more and more common that the travis builds > fail. They fail not because the test suite fails but because of some > inherent issues with travis itself. Usually, either the git clone > fails or some oth

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Usefulness of Travis-CI

2013-01-16 Thread Michael Droettboom
On 01/16/2013 07:15 AM, Thomas Kluyver wrote: On 16 January 2013 08:35, Nathaniel Smith > wrote: When this has come up on the numfocus list before the status was, sure, they can provide resources/funding if you can find someone to do the actual work :-). If any

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Usefulness of Travis-CI

2013-01-16 Thread Thomas Kluyver
On 16 January 2013 08:35, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > When this has come up on the numfocus list before the status was, sure, > they can provide resources/funding if you can find someone to do the actual > work :-). If anyone is interested in putting in the time to solve this > problem properly then

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Usefulness of Travis-CI

2013-01-16 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On 16 Jan 2013 09:30, "Fernando Perez" wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Nelle Varoquaux > wrote: > > > Last but not least, maybe we can see what numfocus has to offer. > > Absolutely! I'll be offline for two weeks, but others on the list can > certainly propose this to numfocus on th

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Usefulness of Travis-CI

2013-01-16 Thread Fernando Perez
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Nelle Varoquaux wrote: > Last but not least, maybe we can see what numfocus has to offer. Absolutely! I'll be offline for two weeks, but others on the list can certainly propose this to numfocus on the list and we can look into what can be done, esp. in a way t

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Usefulness of Travis-CI

2013-01-16 Thread Nelle Varoquaux
>> Hi all, >> >> Recently, it has become more and more common that the travis builds >> fail. They fail not because the test suite fails but because of some >> inherent issues with travis itself. Usually, either the git clone >> fails or some other simple shell command fails. I consider these >>

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Usefulness of Travis-CI

2013-01-15 Thread Eric Firing
On 2013/01/15 2:20 PM, Damon McDougall wrote: > Hi all, > > Recently, it has become more and more common that the travis builds > fail. They fail not because the test suite fails but because of some > inherent issues with travis itself. Usually, either the git clone > fails or some other simple s