Yes. matplotlib can not read the otf format fonts that are generally
shipped as part of the STIX font packages. You need the ones that come
with matplotlib.
Mike
On 12/31/2013 11:59 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> If I rely on the system version of matplotlib
>
> python-matplotlib-1.3.0-1.fc20.x86_6
If I rely on the system version of matplotlib
python-matplotlib-1.3.0-1.fc20.x86_64
stix fonts are not found
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/font_manager.py:1236:
UserWarning:
findfont: Font family ['STIXGeneral'] not found. Falling back to Bitstream Vera
Sans
(prop.get_family
On Nov 28, 2007 9:21 PM, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2007 7:55 PM, Charles Moad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So should I bother with binary releases for 0.91.0? I assume you
> > meant 0.91.1 below as well.
>
> Yes, I meant 91.1 and yes, we should go ahead with the binary
On Nov 28, 2007 7:55 PM, Charles Moad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So should I bother with binary releases for 0.91.0? I assume you
> meant 0.91.1 below as well.
Yes, I meant 91.1 and yes, we should go ahead with the binary
releases. The only way we can find any bugs in the current release,
incl
So should I bother with binary releases for 0.91.0? I assume you
meant 0.91.1 below as well.
- Charlie
On Nov 28, 2007, at 3:34 PM, John Hunter wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2007 2:21 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I suppose this was bound to happen...
>>
>> The released version h
On Nov 28, 2007 2:21 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suppose this was bound to happen...
>
> The released version has a bug that prevents using the (serif) STIX
> fonts. Entirely my fault for not checking all font possibilities after
> a recent change.
>
> r4492 fixes this bu
I suppose this was bound to happen...
The released version has a bug that prevents using the (serif) STIX
fonts. Entirely my fault for not checking all font possibilities after
a recent change.
r4492 fixes this bug.
Let me know how you want to proceed... I'm happy to help cutting
another relea
I have done some preliminary testing with the new changes to
mathtext. The STIX fonts and Arev Sans fonts (still my favorite)
both work well and produce pdf files that are readable by standard
readers (e.g., Preview) and Illustrator. I am using Mac OS X, with
the TkAgg backend.
Nice wo
On Nov 6, 2007 2:09 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No reason, other than the usual "hasn't been tested as much", and how
> that may affect the upcoming release. I anticipate more mis-mapped
> glyphs (I found some already, but I'm sure not all of them). But it
> won't get tes
John Hunter wrote:
> On Nov 6, 2007 1:36 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There is, of course, some time and memory overhead to loading larger
>> fonts, but it may not be significant.
>>
>> The other issue with subsetting the fonts before distributing them is
>> just a matter
On Nov 6, 2007 1:36 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is, of course, some time and memory overhead to loading larger
> fonts, but it may not be significant.
>
> The other issue with subsetting the fonts before distributing them is
> just a matter of person-time: someone has
John Hunter wrote:
> On Nov 6, 2007 1:05 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> This fontforge script seems to do the conversion quite well:
>>
>> #!/usr/bin/fontforge
>> Open($1);
>> Generate($1:r+".ttf");
>> Quit(0);
>>
>> If there are no objection
Darren Dale wrote:
> On Sunday 04 November 2007 9:04:15 am Michael Droettboom wrote:
>> I should also add -- it would be really nice to have STIX fonts working in
>> the upcoming stable release if possible. Hopefully tomorrow morning I can
>> assess how much work that will be and maybe delay taggi
On Nov 6, 2007 1:05 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This fontforge script seems to do the conversion quite well:
>
> #!/usr/bin/fontforge
> Open($1);
> Generate($1:r+".ttf");
> Quit(0);
>
> If there are no objections, I'll go ahead and do that an
The STIX fonts are provided as OpenType wrappers around Adobe Compact
Font Format (CFF or Type 2) fonts (sometimes called OpenType CFF or
'OTTO' font, because of the header tag on these files). With the Agg
backend, this isn't a problem, since freetype supports these fonts
transparently. Howe
STIX fonts seem to be break with PDF or PS font subsetting. Looking
into it...
Cheers,
Mike
Michael Droettboom wrote:
> The STIX fonts are now passing the mathtext_examples.py unit test. This
> font blends much better with fonts like Times.
>
> The rcParam "mathtext.use_cm" (which is new sin
The STIX fonts are now passing the mathtext_examples.py unit test. This
font blends much better with fonts like Times.
The rcParam "mathtext.use_cm" (which is new since the last release) has
been replaced with "mathtext.fontset" which takes either "cm", "stix" or
"custom". To use the STIX fon
John Hunter wrote:
> On 11/5/07, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If we go the route of
wrapping the API (which would be better anyway, since then we could look
for fonts in our own custom font directory), it would just be like the
existing dependencies on freetype and lib
On 11/5/07, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If we go the route of
> > > wrapping the API (which would be better anyway, since then we could look
> > > for fonts in our own custom font directory), it would just be like the
> > > existing dependencies on freetype and libpng. Not a big
On Monday 05 November 2007 8:49:01 am Darren Dale wrote:
> On Monday 05 November 2007 8:07:04 am you wrote:
> > Darren Dale wrote:
> > > On Sunday 04 November 2007 8:50:48 am Michael Droettboom wrote:
> > >> This is maybe another push in the direction of using fontconfig (which
> > >> claims to sup
On Monday 05 November 2007 8:07:04 am you wrote:
> Darren Dale wrote:
> > On Sunday 04 November 2007 8:50:48 am Michael Droettboom wrote:
> >> This is maybe another push in the direction of using fontconfig (which
> >> claims to support otf fonts already). I'd really prefer to go in that
> >> dire
Darren Dale wrote:
> On Sunday 04 November 2007 8:50:48 am Michael Droettboom wrote:
>> This is maybe another push in the direction of using fontconfig (which
>> claims to support otf fonts already). I'd really prefer to go in that
>> direction rather than continue to tack on partial reimplementat
On Sunday 04 November 2007 8:50:48 am Michael Droettboom wrote:
> This is maybe another push in the direction of using fontconfig (which
> claims to support otf fonts already). I'd really prefer to go in that
> direction rather than continue to tack on partial reimplementations of it
> in font_man
On Sunday 04 November 2007 9:04:15 am Michael Droettboom wrote:
> I should also add -- it would be really nice to have STIX fonts working in
> the upcoming stable release if possible. Hopefully tomorrow morning I can
> assess how much work that will be and maybe delay tagging the release
> slightl
I should also add -- it would be really nice to have STIX fonts working in the
upcoming stable release if possible. Hopefully tomorrow morning I can assess
how much work that will be and maybe delay tagging the release slightly so this
can be worked through. It would be nice to remove the Comp
This is maybe another push in the direction of using fontconfig (which claims
to support otf fonts already). I'd really prefer to go in that direction
rather than continue to tack on partial reimplementations of it in
font_manager.py -- but it does complicate dependencies on non-X11 platforms).
On Thursday 01 November 2007 08:16:01 am Michael Droettboom wrote:
> That's great news. I'm very curious how they look with mathtext.
>
> I'll be away from the office for the rest of the week. If any of you want
> to try it in the meantime, it's theoretically possible it already works
> (assuming
That's great news. I'm very curious how they look with mathtext.
I'll be away from the office for the rest of the week. If any of you want to
try it in the meantime, it's theoretically possible it already works (assuming
there's no strange metrics issues in the font.) ---> Set mathtext.use_cm
On Wednesday 31 October 2007 03:48:20 pm John Hunter wrote:
> On 10/31/07, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The STIX fonts issued their first beta release today.
>
> Darren, today is Halloween, not April Fools. We are not that gullible.
>
> :-)
They didn't include a copy of their licens
On 10/31/07, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The STIX fonts issued their first beta release today.
Darren, today is Halloween, not April Fools. We are not that gullible.
:-)
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Spl
The STIX fonts issued their first beta release today. I added the fonts to
mpl-data/fonts/otf.
Darren
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log
On 7/11/07, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought they were going to include both serifs and sans-serifs, but I might
> be wrong. I'm on the list to receive the beta package when it is available,
> which could be any day now.
Definitely within 6 months, heh
JDH
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 05:50:19 pm Eric Firing wrote:
> Mike, John,
>
> I sent an inquiry to stixfonts based on
> http://www.stixfonts.org/swdev_geninfo.html#; I will let you know if
> they come back with anything. It does look like a genuine release is in
> sight. But are these fonts all base
Mike, John,
I sent an inquiry to stixfonts based on
http://www.stixfonts.org/swdev_geninfo.html#; I will let you know if
they come back with anything. It does look like a genuine release is in
sight. But are these fonts all based on Roman style, with serifs,
correct? That seems unfortunate;
34 matches
Mail list logo
