ing interceptors) you can find with
frameworks like Struts and WebWork.
Eelco
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Newton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 9:31 PM
Subject: RE: [Mav-user] Use Apache Commons Logging instead of log4j
+1 on the patch.
I, as well as others, could commit the changes and then we can put together
a new release.
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Newton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[snip]
>
> Do we have a volunteer to do the conversion?
I've looked at the code enough in the last week to feel comfor
y, June 01, 2004 1:52 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [Mav-user] Use Apache Commons Logging instead of log4j
>
> I don't have an opinion either way, and no objections to
> those who are in favor of the switch... but I guess I'm not
> really c
[snip]
>
> Do we have a volunteer to do the conversion?
I've looked at the code enough in the last week to feel comfortable
making the changes.. It seems pretty straight forward. But someone else
may be in a better position w/ cvs, etc. I would just submit patches.
>
> Jeff
>
>
---
dency
less.
Eelco
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Wheeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 8:52 PM
Subject: RE: [Mav-user] Use Apache Commons Logging instead of log4j
I don't have an opinion either way, and no objecti
If you'd give me commit rights I would be happy to do the dirty work ;)
Eelco (sf id eelco12)
- Original Message -
From: "Schnitzer, Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 8:33 PM
Subject: RE: [Mav-user] Use Apache Commo
Apache Commons Logging instead of log4j
That's what I proposed about a year ago, and I still am for replacing Log4J
by Commons Logging.
Eelco
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Newton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 3:56
to do the conversion?
Jeff
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:mav-user-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Hernandez
> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 11:11 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Mav-user] Use Apache Commons Logging instead of
Sure. +1 to changing package names and moving to commons logging, or java
1.4 logging (I think we may have some problems running on 1.3 anyway, or was
it just some of our dependencies...).
It would probably be good to roll any good questions that have come up on
the list into the faq, and document
That's what I proposed about a year ago, and I still am for replacing Log4J
by Commons Logging.
Eelco
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Newton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 3:56 PM
Subject: [Mav-user] Use Apache Commo
There have been a few global changes that have been pending for a
while. For instance there was the discussion of repackaging everything
to net.sf.mav.*. If I'm not mistaken there were a few other changes as
well. Maybe now would be an appropriate time to readdress some of the
changes including
What is everyone's opinion on changing maverick to use the Apache
Commons logging API instead of hardcoding a dependency on log4j. My
reason for wanting this would be to cut down on the large number of jar
files my project is accumulating.. I'd like to use java.util.logging as
much as possible. Thi
12 matches
Mail list logo
