Re: Re[2]: Further Midnight Commander development

2009-02-21 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Miguel de Icaza mig...@novell.com schrieb: I agree with Pavel here. mc-dev has been for the most part dormant, and some terrible decisions (like that whole mhl fiasco) could have been avoided. I wouldn't call it fascio, rather a good lection that even the OSS world isn't free of

Re: Re[2]: Further Midnight Commander development

2009-02-21 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de schrieb: oh, forgot the link ;-o *1) git://git.metux.de/free-mc.git cu -- - Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/

Re: Re[2]: Further Midnight Commander development

2009-02-21 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, It was *YOU* destroyed that by climbing out of your deep dark tomb and behaving like the old king coming back which everyone has to submit to. It was you caused a lot of wasting resources (not just computer's but also human's) for your personal crusade against a lot of things we've done

Re: Re[2]: Further Midnight Commander development

2009-02-21 Thread Miguel de Icaza
*1) git://git.metux.de/free-mc.git Thanks for the link. I guess we can go and pick any good changes from there and merge them into mc now. Miguel. ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel

Re[2]: Further Midnight Commander development

2009-02-16 Thread Pavel Tsekov
Hello Denys, Monday, February 16, 2009, 3:15:45 PM, you wrote: On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Pavel Tsekov ptse...@gmx.net wrote: You might not be aware but I am (still) one of the two official MC maintainers. De jure, maybe you are. De facto, the project is an orphan. How many more

Re: Re[2]: Further Midnight Commander development

2009-02-16 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Pavel Tsekov ptse...@gmx.net wrote: Hello Denys, Monday, February 16, 2009, 3:15:45 PM, you wrote: On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Pavel Tsekov ptse...@gmx.net wrote: You might not be aware but I am (still) one of the two official MC maintainers. De jure,

Re: Re[2]: Further Midnight Commander development

2009-02-16 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
Hi Denys, Would you please cool down a little bit? Don't you think we can resolve this peacefully w/o further mutual accusations, don't we? I think that both parties will benefit from this... It's crystal clear that current development model desperately needs a change. But Pavel has some valid

Re: Re[2]: Further Midnight Commander development

2009-02-16 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, I am not really unavailable. In fact if someone bothered to ping me personally I would have noticed immediately. The list traffic was stalled for quite some time and I haven't been reading it on a regular basis for a while so I missed the interesting part. I agree with Pavel here.

Re[2]: Further Midnight Commander development

2009-02-14 Thread Pavel Tsekov
Hello Oswald, Saturday, February 14, 2009, 4:47:44 PM, you wrote: On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 08:20:29PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote: You don't become a project member and developer by just waiting for the right moment, appearing on the scene and taking over of everything. would you bet? Yes,