Re: Find file dialog in mc-4.6.0-pre3

2003-01-27 Thread Arpi
Hi, > anyway that '32 files in a grpup' approach is quite lame, it would be better > to measure time, and update panel/rot.dash and return at every 0.25 seconds > or so. Or at least call is_idle() from inside do_search() after each file > and return immediately (break the 32 counter) if zero. May

Re: Find file dialog in mc-4.6.0-pre3

2003-01-27 Thread Arpi
Hi, > > > Thank you. The code you found is completely broken. However, your > > > changes don't seem to make any difference for me. Could you please send a > > strange. it solved the problem completely for me, and it seems for others > > too. > > Your patch makes the difference when looking fo

Re: Find file dialog in mc-4.6.0-pre3

2003-01-27 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! > > Thank you. The code you found is completely broken. However, your > > changes don't seem to make any difference for me. Could you please send a > strange. it solved the problem completely for me, and it seems for others > too. Your patch makes the difference when looking for filenam

Re: Find file dialog in mc-4.6.0-pre3

2003-01-27 Thread Arpi
Hi, > > So i went and hunted down the bug :) > > Thank you. The code you found is completely broken. However, your > changes don't seem to make any difference for me. Could you please send a strange. it solved the problem completely for me, and it seems for others too. > patch that works for

Re: Find file dialog in mc-4.6.0-pre3

2003-01-27 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! > So i went and hunted down the bug :) Thank you. The code you found is completely broken. However, your changes don't seem to make any difference for me. Could you please send a patch that works for you? > In src/key.c, the is_idle() function is broken. It's called by the > dialog loo

Re: rpm --nosignature

2003-01-27 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! > > > Can somebody with RH 8.x distro test attached patch. I don't know is > > > that rpm option order sensitive. > > > > It's working fine. Thank you! > > hmm. > then the same trick (if ... then) could be used for dpkg-less systems, > to fallback to ar+tar if no dpkg installed: Yes, exce

Re[2]: .syntax file syntax changed since 4.5.4x?

2003-01-27 Thread Nerijus Baliunas
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 16:37:32 -0500 (EST) Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please be assured that I do what I can to make the next release stable and > reliable. I'm not resting - I have a lot of things to do, not all of > which are related to mc, unfortunately. There is no specific prob

Re: static linking with glib

2003-01-27 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Alexander Varakin wrote: > How? Good question :-) Different methods I can think of: 1) Don't compile shared library if you don't have glib installed. 2) Make a directory, put a link to libglib.a there and add the directory to LDFLAGS: mkdir staticlibs ln -s /usr/lib/libgl

Re: .syntax file syntax changed since 4.5.4x?

2003-01-27 Thread Arpi
Hi, > I agree with you, but this documentation problem is my fault. I > overlooked this when I was changing the documentation about syntax > highlighting. It won't take much time to fix. I also meant fixing documentation. > It looks like that I'll be busy next weekend, so the real release date

Re: .syntax file syntax changed since 4.5.4x?

2003-01-27 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! > > Imho this thing should be cleaned up for 4.6.0, either remove numbers or > > color names or at least fix the manpage to explain what are them, instead > > of having examples using numbers and description using color names. > > Don't get me wrong, I'm not against fixing all you have ment

Re: static linking with glib

2003-01-27 Thread Alexander Varakin
How? From: Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Alexander Varakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: static linking with glib Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 16:06:56 -0500 (EST) Hello! > Is it possible to link with glib statically, so there will be no need to > carry glib libraries?

Re: rpm --nosignature

2003-01-27 Thread Arpi
Hi, > Hello! > > > Can somebody with RH 8.x distro test attached patch. I don't know is > > that rpm option order sensitive. > > It's working fine. Thank you! hmm. then teh same trick (if ... then) could be used for dpkg-less systems, to fallback to ar+tar if no dpkg installed: +# for dpkg-le

Re: rpm --nosignature

2003-01-27 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! > Can somebody with RH 8.x distro test attached patch. I don't know is > that rpm option order sensitive. It's working fine. Thank you! -- Regards, Pavel Roskin ___ Mc-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: static linking with glib

2003-01-27 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! > Is it possible to link with glib statically, so there will be no need to > carry glib libraries? Yes. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin ___ Mc-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel

static linking with glib

2003-01-27 Thread Alexander Varakin
Hi, Is it possible to link with glib statically, so there will be no need to carry glib libraries? Thanks, Alex _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _

Re: HP-UX and AIX buiild problems and patches

2003-01-27 Thread Andrew V. Samoilov
Alexander Varakin ÐÉÛÅÔ: The problem here is that app_text was declared as extern const char app_text []; in header file, and then it was defined in c file as static const char app_text [] = which is not consistent, so the compiler complained about this. Alex From: "Andrew V. Samoilov

Re: HP-UX and AIX buiild problems and patches

2003-01-27 Thread Alexander Varakin
The problem here is that app_text was declared as extern const char app_text []; in header file, and then it was defined in c file as static const char app_text [] = which is not consistent, so the compiler complained about this. Alex From: "Andrew V. Samoilov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:

Re: HP-UX and AIX buiild problems and patches

2003-01-27 Thread Andrew V. Samoilov
Alexander Varakin wrote: Hi Andrew, I don't have access to AIX box right now, but I am sure that the build problems in util.c are not warnings. The AIX xlc_r compiler is very strict, so it produced errors there. Attached hunk of your AIX patch is not clear for me: -- Regards, Andrew V. Samoil

Re: HP-UX and AIX buiild problems and patches

2003-01-27 Thread Alexander Varakin
Hi Andrew, I don't have access to AIX box right now, but I am sure that the build problems in util.c are not warnings. The AIX xlc_r compiler is very strict, so it produced errors there. Alex From: "Andrew V. Samoilov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Alexander Varakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PR

Re: HP-UX and AIX buiild problems and patches

2003-01-27 Thread Andrew V. Samoilov
Hello! Alexander Varakin wrote: Hi, I tried to build mc-4.6.0-pre3 on HP-UX and AIX and ran into some problems, which I fixed, patches are attached. I was using native c compilers on both (xlc_r from Visual Age 5.0 on AIX, and aCC 3.31 on HP-UX) , which are more picky than gcc, so some fixes

mc compilation bug

2003-01-27 Thread Igor Leonidovich Klechkovsky
mc-4.6.0-pre3 HP-UX 11.00 without X QPK 58.5 (sep. 2002) glib-1.2.10 config.log.bz2 Description: BZip2 compressed data config.status.bz2 Description: BZip2 compressed data configure.log.bz2 Description: BZip2 compressed data make.log.bz2 Description: BZip2 compressed data

4.6.0-pre3 : display problems on Solaris

2003-01-27 Thread Alexander Varakin
Hi, I have built 4.6.0-pre3 on solaris without any problems, but it has the following problems: 1. directories and executables are not highlited (they are supposed to be white and green, right? ) 2. if the cursor was on directory, and i moved the cursor higher, this old directory changes its col

facl ExtFS addon

2003-01-27 Thread Валентин А . Алексеев
Hello! I wrote an extfs script that allow to edit ACL and ExtAttrs on filesystems that support it. Currently it was tested on UFS of FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE and Solaris 2.8 i86pc. As soon as possible I'll try to test it on Linux as well. Installation instructio

Re: rpm --nosignature

2003-01-27 Thread Andrew V. Samoilov
Hello, Arpi Fixed in CVS: 2002-12-29 Andrew V. Samoilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * extfs/rpm: Use --nosignature only if rpm supports this. but in mc.ext it's still there: # RPM packages (SuSE uses *.spm for source packages) regex/\.(rpm|spm)$ Open=%cd %p#rpm View=%view{a

Re: Find file dialog in mc-4.6.0-pre3

2003-01-27 Thread Pavel Tsekov
Hello, Thanks, for tracking this down! I guess I was the one responsible for this bug being introduced. On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Arpi wrote: > Hi, > > > I've scanned a TODO list and found the item - > > "Make find dialog more responsive" - inside > > "After 4.6.1 on 4.6.x branch" section. > > > >