Re: Standards for Digital Masters

2004-10-13 Thread Amy Stidwill
Thank you to all who responded to my query. Your questions and responses have in turn challenged my thinking about the original problem. While the functional master will need to be quite large to meet many potential uses, I wonder if we need an archival master of a surrogate of a surrogate of a

Re: Standards for Digital Masters

2004-10-13 Thread amacdonald
) 998-5689 Fax / Télécopie : (613) 990-3655 Website: www.aviation.technomuses.ca Email: amacdon...@technomuses.ca Amy Stidwill astidw...@hillwoodmuseum.org 10/13/2004 09:18 AM Please respond to mcn-l To:mcn-l@mcn.edu cc: Subject:Re: Standards for Digital Masters

Re: Standards for Digital Masters

2004-10-13 Thread Roger Howard
The bigger the file size (70MB - 250MB is not uncommon) the better. In other words, the bigger the file the more information on the object is captured. Also, focus on one master format, i.e. TIFF is a very common format in this regard (do not compress the files) and if you apply color

Re: Standards for Digital Masters

2004-10-13 Thread Tom Arnautovic
As I said, surrogates, not masters. Masters are un-cropped, first acquired digital images. Any corrections to the original digital image makes it a surrogate. Color corrections are necessary once you start making reproductions of the masters for print or online display. Those copies of the

Re: Standards for Digital Masters

2004-10-13 Thread Jeff Evans
I second this. Don't get in the habit of keeping layered Tiffs around beyond the image processing / pre press stage. Jeff Evans Digital Imaging Specialist Princeton University Art Museum 609.258.8579 On Oct 13, 2004, at 11:56 AM, Roger Howard wrote: The bigger the file size (70MB - 250MB

Re: Standards for Digital Masters

2004-10-13 Thread amalyah keshet
At 23:04 12/10/2004, Tom Arnautovic wrote: Get the highest possible digital capture and go from there. If your scanner maxes out @4000DPI, why bother scanning it at a lower resolution, or targeting a specific file size? Simple. Memory and budgetary limitations. Amalyah Keshet Head of

Re: Standards for Digital Masters

2004-10-13 Thread Peter Siegel
You might also want to make sure that your camera / scanner can deliver 4000 DPI; otherwise your making a lot of pixels. There are some benchmarking techniques available to ensure your device can produce the resolution you expect. -Peter On Oct 13, 2004, at 2:03 PM, amalyah keshet wrote:

Re: Standards for Digital Masters

2004-10-13 Thread Tom Arnautovic
Budgetary concerns were never mentioned in the original inquiry of the poster. akes...@netvision.net.il 10/13/04 11:03AM At 23:04 12/10/2004, Tom Arnautovic wrote: Get the highest possible digital capture and go from there. If your scanner maxes out @4000DPI, why bother scanning it at a lower

Standards for Digital Masters

2004-10-12 Thread Amy Stidwill
I am in the process of reviewing and updating our standards for master digital files as we switch to a new collections management system. We have not entered the realm of direct digital capture and are scanning primarily from 4 x 5 transparencies. If this sounds like your museum, please let me

Re: Standards for Digital Masters

2004-10-12 Thread Jeff Evans
Amy - I am neck deep in a massive digitization project - so excuse the quick response. From 4x5 Transp.: Master File 6000 pixels on the long side Tiff file 75MB RGB Master Crop 4000 Px Tiff file 40 MB RGB Derivatives: 2000 pixels Jpeg 768 Pixels Jpeg 150 Pixels jpeg for thumbs This was

Re: Standards for Digital Masters

2004-10-12 Thread Peter Siegel
Hi Amy When you say master, are considering this an Archive type image (a file that can replace the original film if destroyed), or an image that can be multi-purposed for offset press, web, analysis, research etc.? On Oct 12, 2004, at 3:31 PM, Amy Stidwill wrote: I am in the process of

Re: Standards for Digital Masters

2004-10-12 Thread melings
Amy, A few things that might be of interest: California Digital Library Digital Image Format Standards (2001) http://www.cdlib.org/news/pdf/CDLImageStd-2001.pdf Imaging Best Practices - Digital Publishing Group - UC Berkeley

Re: Standards for Digital Masters

2004-10-12 Thread Amy Stidwill
Peter, Yes to your second description of an image that can be used to make derivatives for a variety of purposes. Thanks, Amy Amy Stidwill Visual Resources Manager Hillwood Museum Gardens 4155 Linnean Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20008 (202) 243-3910 phone (202) 966-7846 fax

Re: Standards for Digital Masters

2004-10-12 Thread Tom Arnautovic
Hello Amy, I managed various digitization projects in the past 6 years, and a good rule of thumb is to push the limits of your digital acquisition hardware. We scanned a multitude of source material (lantern slides, nitrate negatives, positives, 35mm, etc., or over 60,000 objects) and do not

Re: Standards for Digital Masters

2004-10-12 Thread Trudy Levy
Amy - If your master is to create derivatives, then I advise creating a master that meets your needs for 90% of your possible uses. I find that on the occasion that you need to make that unique use, it is better to rescan for that specific purpose, this might be a large wall mounted displays for