Re: [MeeGo-dev] Touch support in X (was: QtMobility has branched)

2010-10-24 Thread Ilkka Laukkanen
2010/10/19 meego-dev-requ...@meego.com: From: Thiago Macieira thi...@kde.org Em Terça-feira 19 Outubro 2010, às 17:31:10, sakari.pou...@nokia.com escreveu: For MeeGo 1.2 the X.org 1.10 release is too late. We did not upgrade kernel and X in the beginning of the 1.2 cycle because we wanted to

[MeeGo-dev] Touch support in X (was: QtMobility has branched)

2010-10-19 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em Sexta-feira 15 Outubro 2010, às 10:43:48, Thiago Macieira escreveu: Em Quarta-feira 06 Outubro 2010, às 10:54:39, Thiago Macieira escreveu: So we're not going to update to X.org 1.10? This will seriously impact any plans to provide proper touch support. If we're not upgrading to X.org

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Touch support in X (was: QtMobility has branched)

2010-10-19 Thread George Ingram
...@meego.com] On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 3:53 AM To: meego-dev@meego.com Subject: [MeeGo-dev] Touch support in X (was: QtMobility has branched) Em Sexta-feira 15 Outubro 2010, às 10:43:48, Thiago Macieira escreveu: Em Quarta-feira 06 Outubro 2010, às 10:54:39, Thiago

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Touch support in X (was: QtMobility has branched)

2010-10-19 Thread sakari.poussa
Hi, For MeeGo 1.2 the X.org 1.10 release is too late. We did not upgrade kernel and X in the beginning of the 1.2 cycle because we wanted to keep the codeline stable and working. We would not upgrade X in the end of the cycle either. That should be pretty clear common sense. The only solution

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Touch support in X (was: QtMobility has branched)

2010-10-19 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em Terça-feira 19 Outubro 2010, às 17:31:10, sakari.pou...@nokia.com escreveu: Hi, For MeeGo 1.2 the X.org 1.10 release is too late. We did not upgrade kernel and X in the beginning of the 1.2 cycle because we wanted to keep the codeline stable and working. We would not upgrade X in the end

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Touch support in X (was: QtMobility has branched)

2010-10-19 Thread sakari.poussa
On 19/10/10 6:47 PM, ext Thiago Macieira thi...@kde.org wrote: Em Terça-feira 19 Outubro 2010, às 17:31:10, sakari.pou...@nokia.com escreveu: Hi, For MeeGo 1.2 the X.org 1.10 release is too late. We did not upgrade kernel and X in the beginning of the 1.2 cycle because we wanted to keep the

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Touch support in X (was: QtMobility has branched)

2010-10-19 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em Terça-feira 19 Outubro 2010, às 17:47:24, Thiago Macieira escreveu: This is a bit unfortunate for us since we do need to focus on XInput 2.1 anyway: other teams will not stop because of MeeGo. If they forge ahead with the development, we need to be a part of it to ensure our needs are

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Touch support in X (was: QtMobility has branched)

2010-10-19 Thread Wichmann, Mats D
meego-dev-boun...@meego.com wrote: On 19/10/10 6:47 PM, ext Thiago Macieira thi...@kde.org wrote: Em Terça-feira 19 Outubro 2010, às 17:31:10, sakari.pou...@nokia.com escreveu: Hi, For MeeGo 1.2 the X.org 1.10 release is too late. We did not upgrade kernel and X in the beginning of the

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Touch support in X (was: QtMobility has branched)

2010-10-19 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em Terça-feira 19 Outubro 2010, às 18:04:05, sakari.pou...@nokia.com escreveu: This is a bit unfortunate for us since we do need to focus on XInput 2.1 anyway: other teams will not stop because of MeeGo. If they forge ahead with the development, we need to be a part of it to ensure our needs

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Touch support in X (was: QtMobility has branched)

2010-10-19 Thread sakari.poussa
On 19/10/10 7:12 PM, ext Wichmann, Mats D mats.d.wichm...@intel.com wrote: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com wrote: On 19/10/10 6:47 PM, ext Thiago Macieira thi...@kde.org wrote: Em Terça-feira 19 Outubro 2010, às 17:31:10, sakari.pou...@nokia.com escreveu: Hi, For MeeGo 1.2 the X.org 1.10