On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 11:11:08 +0100, Rita Ribeiro ritbe...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi, i will buy a computer to program in python using the MEEP software,
but
i have several questions about it. Should i bought two computers to do
parallel programming or just one computer with several cpu?
R.
Hi
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:14:29 +0800, 虞益挺 yyt8...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Giovanni,
Thanks for your reply and the links.
I am sorry that I didn't make it so clear to my question. As for the
meep
simulation with dispersive materials, I have no problems and it goes
well.
At this stage, I
You can find the formula in lots of publications relating with the
transmission property of metallic nanohole arrays. The following link
gives
one of the most important:
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josab/abstract.cfm?uri=josab-16-10-1743
Periodicity plays an important role in the
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:33:07 +0800, 虞益挺 yyt8...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Aaron,
Dear meep users,By the 3D simulation using MEEP, the transmission
property at
wavelengths 500~1000nm of 2D periodic array of Au nanoholes has now
been
achieved, from which an obvious SP resonant wavelength is
and see if this helps (describes a problem like yours and its
solution):
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.science.electromagnetism.meep.general/4080/match=gpipc
Giovanni
Message sent by Cup Webmail (Roundcube
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 08:49:47 -0400, J. Steele Parris parri...@vcu.edu
wrote:
The tip is a 1x1x4 nickel block that has been cut to a pyramid point on
one
side and affixed to a nickel layer (1 unit thick) and a silicon
substrate.
There is also a thin layer of silver on the pyramid point of the
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:51:38 -0400, J. Steele Parris parri...@vcu.edu
wrote:
Hello fellow Meep users!
I am measuring the enhancement of the electric field at the tip of a
nickel
nanotip with a silver coating on top. When I measure and compare to a
blank
field, the enhancement is 10^13. I find
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:53:16 -0700 (PDT), hodjat hajian
hh.solidst...@yahoo.com wrote:
Dear users hi,
I extract some data in a comma-delimited format in a .dat file, as
below:
flux1:, 0.25, 2.64484059275628e-4
flux1:, 0.250400801603206, 2.87434928639728e-4
flux1:, 0.250801603206413,
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:18:25 +0200, gpipc gp...@cup.uni-muenchen.de
wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:53:16 -0700 (PDT), hodjat hajian
hh.solidst...@yahoo.com wrote:
Dear users hi,
I extract some data in a comma-delimited format in a .dat file, as
below:
flux1:, 0.25, 2.64484059275628e-4
flux1
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 19:32:00 -0400, Boshen Gao
boshen.gao.opt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am using meep-mpi to simulate some simple 3-D SOI photonic crystal
based
structures on my PC. It has an i7-930 Quad-core CPU @ 4 GHz. My problem
is,
while I use command
mpirun -np 4 meep-mpi
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:18:00 +0100, Stefan mystylishl...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Dear Meep-users,
I hope you can help me with two questions:
1) When I fit experimental data of the dielectric function with the
formula given in Materials in Meep, so find the polarizabilities, it
seems to me
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:58:22 +0100, Stefan mystylishl...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi Giovanni,
thanks a lot for your reply. When I use h5topng to make the results
visible I see the waves propagating as expected for source and output
Ez, but don't see any waves for source and output Ex or Ey.
I
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:16:03 +0100, Stefan Kapser
stefan.kap...@ph.tum.de
wrote:
Dear Meep users,
I have got the Polarizabilities in Meep units for a=1µm and would now
like to use these in a simulation with a=1nm.
Since the unit of the polarizability is A^2 s^4 / kg I want to convert
the
the name of the sender first and I often forget about it.
On 01/28/2011 02:21 PM, gpipc wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:16:03 +0100, Stefan Kapser
stefan.kap...@ph.tum.de
wrote:
Dear Meep users,
I have got the Polarizabilities in Meep units for a=1µm and would now
like to use
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:27:44 +0100, Stefan Kapser
stefan.kap...@ph.tum.de
wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to simulate a laser pulse falling on a dielectric structure
and don't really know where to find the necessary information.
What I am especially looking for is how to define the spectral
Hi,
I have a question on what happens if one sets a list of geometrical
objects that occupy the same parts of space. For example, modifiying
slightly the first example in the Meep tutorial:
(set! geometry-lattice (make lattice (size 16 8 no-size)))
(set! geometry (list
(make
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:36:44 +0800, Towhidur Razzak towrazz...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear all,
I am trying to simulate light propagation through a gold
nano-aperture. But I have not yet obtain a model of gold which can
reliably
model gold in MEEP at optical frequencies.
It would
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 01:36:54 +0100, Georg Wachter georgwach...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
For the simulation of small metal structures with meep, I unfortunately
need
a ridiculously high resolution,
Hi Georg,
since we are working with a similar FDTD problem (simulation of small
metal
On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 18:05:57 -0800, Alex Swinton McLeod
alexsmcl...@gmail.com wrote:
Giovanni,
It depends on what you are trying to do. If you are simply interested
in an integrated flux quantity e.g. total scattered flux, then all the
tools you need are already built into meep, as you
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 01:36:54 +0100, Georg Wachter georgwach...@gmail.com
wrote:
PS.: I would really like to see a possibility for having regions of
different resolution in meep. This is The One Feature (for me) that
commercial competitors have over Meep or any free electromagnetism
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:46:51 -0500, Brock Palen bro...@umich.edu wrote:
When trying to build the MPI version of meep I keep getting errors when
trying to include libctl
./configure --with-libctl=/tmp/libctl/
--prefix=/home/software/rhel5/meep/1.1.1/par --with-mpi CC=mpicc
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:38:22 -0700, Alex McLeod alexsmcl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Jack,
In regards to your questions about near-field enhancement and
scattering, I have some comments to make.
(cut)
Also, note that using flux regions will only let you compute
absorption, since fluxes
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 18:59:59 +0100, gpipc gp...@cup.uni-muenchen.de
wrote:
Dear Meep users,
I have compiled Meep on my personal computer in the office without
problems; now I want to install Meep on a cluster (managed by someone
else)
and I have a problem linking to some HDF5 libraries.
I
Dear Meep users,
still regarding the problem of linking to the HDF5 libraries that I am
experiencing, I have become suspicious about the error message
Linking the shared library libmeep.la against the
*** static library /lrz/sys/libraries/hdf5/1.6.10_serial/lib/libhdf5_hl.a
is not portable!
It
Dear Meep users,
I have compiled Meep on my personal computer in the office without
problems; now I want to install Meep on a cluster (managed by someone else)
and I have a problem linking to some HDF5 libraries.
More precisely I get these messages from make
*** Warning: Linking the shared
Dear Meep users,
I would like to calculate the scattering cross-section of a gold
nanoparticle using Meep; with the method of hitting the nanoparticle with a
plane wave and calculating the flux exiting a box that completely surrounds
it. The calculation works reasonably if I model the nanoparticle
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:42:11 +0100, Marell, M.J.H. m.j.h.mar...@tue.nl
wrote:
If I’m not mistaking , this only works for dispersive media of which the
real part is positive, because for negative epsilon you just get
exponential decay
There is way to verify your material:
Dear Meep users,
I want to buy a new computer (or a small workstation if that will be the
best deal) for running numerical calculation - among which Meep. Maybe with
two processors, but first I want to get some information and orient myself
on the various options: if possible, I would like to get
28 matches
Mail list logo
