Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-10 Thread David Brodbeck
R A Bennell wrote: It is basic ignorance. Most people out there have no idea that your old diesel can't go any faster. For whatever reason, people behind the wheel often become irritated way too easy. Traffic is frustrating at times and people have no patience. They just want you out of their

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-10 Thread David Brodbeck
Trampas wrote: There is nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes. With all due respect, a cheap BMW is much more expensive. ;)

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-10 Thread David Brodbeck
Marshall Booth wrote: The cost of major repairs on a Mercedes (required infrequently, but if needed - they ARE REQUIRED) can be very high... Part of the problem is Mercedes mechanics are expensive and hard to find, and run-of-the-mill shops don't want to touch these cars. I'm beginning to

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-10 Thread Bill Gallagher
All the people I work with and my neighbors are on their second or third cars. Total cost for two brand new cars is in the range of 40-65k plus interest cost for some.. they always tease me about my car is under repair most of the times but I tell them in 12 years since I owned the

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-10 Thread Curt Raymond
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads To: Mercedes Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Bill 1981 300 TD p.s. major work is done in Canada like $1,261.00 bill at a MB

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-09 Thread Brian Chase
But would it be worth doing all the crack? Seriously though, jesting aside: One of the things that I was most surprised about when I began to investigate an older Mercedes was how affordable they were. Not having had any specific interest in them in the past, I always assumed that even an old

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-09 Thread Tom Scordato
Message - From: Zoltan Finks [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mercedes Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 5:00 PM Subject: Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads You'll probably find more helpful posts than this, but I can tell you that I just had

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-09 Thread Tom Scordato
PROTECTED] To: Mercedes Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 4:58 PM Subject: Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads Tom Scordato wrote: I have located some used engines that have been compression tested and are in the 100K miles to 150K mile ranges

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-09 Thread Tom Scordato
. Small stubby angle ratchet helps. Tom Scordato - Original Message - From: Brian Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 8:02 PM Subject: Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads But would

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-09 Thread Jim Cathey
There are good Mercedes and bad ones. It really depends on the prior maintenance. One thing is for sure once a car reaches a critical threshold of broken stuff it is junk. That threshold varies depending on what is wrong, and your DIY abilities and interests. But even a junk car, such as the

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-09 Thread Zoltan Finks
, 2006 8:02 PM Subject: Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads But would it be worth doing all the crack? Seriously though, jesting aside: One of the things that I was most surprised about when I began to investigate an older Mercedes was how affordable they were

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-09 Thread Marshall Booth
Brian Chase wrote: So basically one that is in the lower $2k range is one that, generally speaking, has not been maintained and the seller therefore knows it has problems? You seem to imagine that the prices being asked and given actually correlate with the car's condition. Sometimes they

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-09 Thread Zoltan Finks
Your new acqusition sounds a lot like mine - the paint that shines up (though the blemishes up close are depressing) the good interior, the no rust, even the scrape on the side. Your summary of WHY these autos are so good is useful. That's the type of pertinent answer I was looking for - as

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-09 Thread Loren Faeth
As Herr Doktor says is true. I would like to point out that it is a lot cheaper to risk making a mistake with a kaleb car or a $2500 car or even a $5000 car than to make a mistake with a collectable car that sells in the 30k to 500k range or more. I have made a couple of mistakes with $1000

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-09 Thread Dwight E. Giles, Jr
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Scordato Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 8:32 PM To: Mercedes Discussion List Subject: Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads Brian said All that said, I still do admire this type of vehicle and think that it is one of the few that - since I

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-09 Thread Zoltan Finks
Of course not. Let me try to phrase things better: What DOES explain the great variance in asking price of these vehicles? Let's remove the variable of folks being on crack for the moment. I mean, if some people ask 8 or 10 thousand for their 123, what's stopping everybody from doing so? There is

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-09 Thread Harry Watkins
I've bought five MB diesels in the last four years with less total money than I paid for a used Camry. I paid too much for two of them, got very good deals on two others and one was just about right. The SDL that I paid much too much for has costs me the most and is still not in good shape. The

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-09 Thread John Berryman
On Mar 8, 2006, at 9:05 PM, Zoltan Finks wrote: Actually I have already RR'd the starter and it was very simple. The only problem, in fact, was physically extracting the thing from the engine compartment. The first time I did it I struggled a good while but got it. The second time I failed

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-09 Thread John Berryman
On Mar 8, 2006, at 9:59 PM, Zoltan Finks wrote: Hope this clears up what I was getting at when I said that some sellers ask much lower prices, and the only explanation that I could come up with is that there are such obvious problems with the vehicle that they know they can't realistically

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-09 Thread Jim Cathey
in good shape. The best deal has costs very little, so what I paid did not match what I got. The best deal is not usually the best car, in any but perhaps the purely monetary sense. My best deal is probably the Frankenheap. But it's not a datemobile, to say the least! -- Jim

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-09 Thread Jim Cathey
But I was surprised to hear, from the Doktor, that some of those $10k prices might actually be warranted. Not really if you stop to think about, with maybe a parts catalog for reference. If you love such a car, and want it to be in near-new condition you can buy one for $10k (say), or spend

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-09 Thread Tom Scordato
:43 PM Subject: Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads Tom, I like and agree with your philosophy-I will always drive a MB diesel for the rest of my life-I have two sitting in the driveway right now. Dwight Giles, Jr 1979 240D auto, 250K + miles 1990 300D 2.5t, 129K miles

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-09 Thread Tom Scordato
10:30 PM Subject: Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads On Mar 8, 2006, at 9:59 PM, Zoltan Finks wrote: Hope this clears up what I was getting at when I said that some sellers ask much lower prices, and the only explanation that I could come up

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-09 Thread Richard Hattaway
Tom, I have swaped engines on a couple of occasions at the 240D level. The major issues you will run into will be the glow system and some issues with which power steering pumps, pulleys, harmonic balancers, etc fit what cars. If you have A/C that can also be an issue. What it amounts to is

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-09 Thread Jim Cathey
123 chassis. The vacuum door locks give me real grief on all those. I do by With some ingenuity, the electric-pump system of later cars (124/126/201) could be fitted to your 123. On the whole that system is a lot more reliable. It would be a labor of love, for a car that otherwise pleased

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-09 Thread John Berryman
On Mar 8, 2006, at 11:03 PM, Jim Cathey wrote: My best deal is probably the Frankenheap. But it's not a datemobile, to say the least! My best MB deal has to be The $100 Car 1979 300SD w/ 134,000mi. It really just needed to be cleaned up and driven after some adjustments and I had to

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-09 Thread Zoltan Finks
'Tom, You asked: why so hateful? I think it's human nature to act like the kids in line at school, pushing and shoving. Why so discontent? Also human nature, but IMHO, bolstered by TV. Someone has said that TV only exists in order to show commercials, and commercials ony exist to make us

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-09 Thread R A Bennell
PROTECTED] Behalf Of Zoltan Finks Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 3:09 PM To: Mercedes Discussion List Subject: Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads 'Tom, You asked: why so hateful? I think it's human nature to act like the kids in line at school, pushing and shoving. Why so

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-09 Thread Zoltan Finks
You hit it right on. I began to realize this a few years back when I'd drive to the dog park around rush hour because that's when my sweetheart went there. I would just about every day I would encounter one or two drivers who would get aggressive with me, sometimes worse than others. But once at

[MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-08 Thread Tom Scordato
A few questions for the group please 1. Can a 1977 123 chassis take/accept an 617.9xx non turbo engine with out major modifications from the years 1978-1980 to last non turbo year? 2. What are the estimated hours to pull out existing 617.9xx engine, remove things such as alternators, refer

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-08 Thread Marshall Booth
Tom Scordato wrote: I have located some used engines that have been compression tested and are in the 100K miles to 150K mile ranges, some which have been sitting for some time. I am at a cross roads on the path of deciding if the car is worth it. I do not have the scope of supply to do

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-08 Thread Zoltan Finks
You'll probably find more helpful posts than this, but I can tell you that I just had the engine replaced in a 240D. Engine cost me 900 and the complete RR job done by an indy - not me - cost 800 (plus a couple unexpected expenses). The engine I got usually sells for 1100. Was it worth it to us?

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-08 Thread Rusty Cullens
You'll have to change the exhaust too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Scordato Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 4:03 PM To: Mercedes Discussion List Subject: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads A few questions

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-08 Thread Trampas
one in it. There is nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes. Trampas -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zoltan Finks Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 5:01 PM To: Mercedes Discussion List Subject: Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-08 Thread Marshall Booth
Zoltan Finks wrote: You'll probably find more helpful posts than this, but I can tell you that I just had the engine replaced in a 240D. Engine cost me 900 and the complete RR job done by an indy - not me - cost 800 (plus a couple unexpected expenses). The engine I got usually sells for 1100.

Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

2006-03-08 Thread R A Bennell
: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads You'll probably find more helpful posts than this, but I can tell you that I just had the engine replaced in a 240D. Engine cost me 900 and the complete RR job done by an indy - not me - cost 800 (plus a couple unexpected expenses