Re: [MBZ] The new D-C way to design cars...

2007-03-09 Thread Loren Faeth
They still put a bare frame on the rail and then put in the heater and 
under-dash wiring and only then commence to build the rest of the vehicle 
around the heater ala the 108-115 models.  Nothing has changed in the way 
they build them.




At 05:57 PM 3/8/2007, you wrote:

hell they always in the past had quite a few items that were the same on
all models, wonder why they would have got away from that in the first
place.

Werner Fehlauer wrote:
 The following is copied from an Email sent out by AutoWeek 
magazine.  While
 this may make economic sense, it seems to follow the GM/Ford/Chrysler 
model,

 and we know how well that has worked in the long haul.




Loren Faeth 





Re: [MBZ] The new D-C way to design cars...

2007-03-09 Thread ts
Jim very good / truthful wisdom below.  When Caddy came out with a truck and 
called it the escapade that was another
nail in coffin for the US auto market.  In 30 years or less there will be no 
more US car manufactures or Paper Mills for that matter.



As a country you need to make things and sell them to ourselves and the 
world.  We did this (very well once) when we were economically great, hungry 
and humble about it.
Now we pat ourselves on the back for being a consumer nation with a strong 
army and navy. A service economy  We are just supporting the demographics 
(of 320 million people all
looking for a home in the suburbs) now and not very well I might add as the 
two class system is rising to the top again, the haves and have nots.   It 
always does

when money and things get tight.

I have heard good things about the Hyundai cars as well.  Comes from a 
people/country being hungry to achieve goodness I guess.


Regards Tom
1979 240D
- Original Message - 
From: Jim Cathey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The new D-C way to design cars...



The following is copied from an Email sent out by AutoWeek magazine.
While
this may make economic sense, it seems to follow the GM/Ford/Chrysler
model,
and we know how well that has worked in the long haul.


Great, GM design-by-committee!  Bodes not well for high-quality
vehicles.  Remember that Cadillac used to be a very high quality
car?  But now it feeds from the same GM parts trough as the
cheapest car they make.

If they already had a perfect door handle, there'd be no reason
to change it for a new model.  I don't buy the argument.  They
should have just said it's cheaper.  The fact that the sunroof,
say, won't be matched in size to the vehicle isn't supposed to
bother anybody.  Certainly not the accountants now running the
show!

And, of course, once your perfect door handle is no longer
so perfect for the application well too bad.  Too many things
use it for you to be able to change that one perfect handle.
I predict stagnation in the parts supply.  Versus the well-known
dictum grow or die.

A co-worker just bought a new Kia, and was very favorably
impressed with the quality he got for his money...

-- Jim


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com







Re: [MBZ] The new D-C way to design cars...

2007-03-09 Thread Steve MacSween
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 As a country you need to make things and sell them to ourselves and the
 world.  We did this (very well once) when we were economically great, hungry
 and humble about it.
 Now we pat ourselves on the back for being a consumer nation with a strong
 army and navy. A service economy  We are just supporting the demographics
 (of 320 million people all
 looking for a home in the suburbs) now and not very well I might add as the
 two class system is rising to the top again, the haves and have nots.   It
 always does
 when money and things get tight.
 
 I have heard good things about the Hyundai cars as well.  Comes from a
 people/country being hungry to achieve goodness I guess.

Matter of degree, as I see it. Post-war, the U.S. appeared unstoppable,
however our ethos in North America is not geared toward sweating everything
to the Nth degree. Frankly not in Great Britain either. That is on the
production side On the consumer side, we don't exactly rise up in
collective anger at less than perfect consumer products, do we?

An American invented the concept of Quality Control and was forgotten as a
crank at home... until the Japanese stumbled upon it. His name is now legend
in Japan.

The Koreans are simply following the Japanese model, except they are able to
do it cheaper. Next the Chinese will trump the Koreans at the game. Wait
until the Chinese ship cars to North America, then things will get
interesting.

Aside: Remember when Made in Japan was a derogatory expression? (I am 48
now, and it was a kids taunt when I was growing up.)

The Brits OWNED the small car market worldwide, post-war until the 60s. Look
where they are (aren't, to be more exact) now.

Look at how far GM took hybrid research before they effectively shelved it.
When Toyota released the Prius it shocked GM and Ford into near
catatonic-state, apparently, they had had their Best and Brightest telling
them it could not be done, etc. (To be fair to the Best and Brightest,
naturally I am sure that was said within the parameters of the dictated
expected return on investment)

So now we see GM using the Toyota system under license for the Vue Greenline
(and according to what I've read, doing a lousy job of it).

All it takes is one Richard Branson to get hold of one of the Big Three and
start to stir things up. Will it happen? Am I joking? I must be.

Mac




Re: [MBZ] The new D-C way to design cars...

2007-03-09 Thread Christopher McCann
Interesting you bring up paper mills. For the most part, the USA is like a 
third world country when it comes to paper. We export pulp as a raw material 
and then re-import it as paper that is manufactured elsewhere - most of it, I 
think, in Finland. Indeed, there will be no paper mills here soon.

CM

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jim very good / truthful wisdom below.  When Caddy 
came out with a truck and 
called it the escapade that was another
nail in coffin for the US auto market.  In 30 years or less there will be no 
more US car manufactures or Paper Mills for that matter.


As a country you need to make things and sell them to ourselves and the 
world.  We did this (very well once) when we were economically great, hungry 
and humble about it.
Now we pat ourselves on the back for being a consumer nation with a strong 
army and navy. A service economy  We are just supporting the demographics 
(of 320 million people all
looking for a home in the suburbs) now and not very well I might add as the 
two class system is rising to the top again, the haves and have nots.   It 
always does
when money and things get tight.

I have heard good things about the Hyundai cars as well.  Comes from a 
people/country being hungry to achieve goodness I guess.

Regards Tom
1979 240D
- Original Message - 
From: Jim Cathey 
To: Mercedes Discussion List 
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The new D-C way to design cars...


 The following is copied from an Email sent out by AutoWeek magazine.
 While
 this may make economic sense, it seems to follow the GM/Ford/Chrysler
 model,
 and we know how well that has worked in the long haul.

 Great, GM design-by-committee!  Bodes not well for high-quality
 vehicles.  Remember that Cadillac used to be a very high quality
 car?  But now it feeds from the same GM parts trough as the
 cheapest car they make.

 If they already had a perfect door handle, there'd be no reason
 to change it for a new model.  I don't buy the argument.  They
 should have just said it's cheaper.  The fact that the sunroof,
 say, won't be matched in size to the vehicle isn't supposed to
 bother anybody.  Certainly not the accountants now running the
 show!

 And, of course, once your perfect door handle is no longer
 so perfect for the application well too bad.  Too many things
 use it for you to be able to change that one perfect handle.
 I predict stagnation in the parts supply.  Versus the well-known
 dictum grow or die.

 A co-worker just bought a new Kia, and was very favorably
 impressed with the quality he got for his money...

 -- Jim


 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 



___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Christopher McCann, happy customer of austerlitzshepherds.com
Ohne Zucht keine Leistung, ohne Leistung keine Zucht!
-2006 GSD, Anke (Yanke von der Burg Austerlitz)
-2006 GSD, Sammy (Zane von der Burg Austerlitz)
Freude an der Arbeit: Hoechste Leistung - Mercedes-Benz.
-1985 300SD, 220K miles, Wulf
-1982 300Dt, 117K miles, little blue klatter box
 
-
We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 09 15:15:32 2007
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.187])
by server8.arterytc8.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1HPgod-n1-5v
for mercedes@okiebenz.com; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:15:32 +
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a4so1076397nfc
for mercedes@okiebenz.com; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 07:15:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.115.23.12 with SMTP id a12mr589098waj.1173453334868;
Fri, 09 Mar 2007 07:15:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.113.6 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 07:15:34 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 09:15:34 -0600
From: Gary Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Resister to lower voltage to use LEDS as small lights
X-BeenThere: mercedes@okiebenz.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9.cp2
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Mercedes Discussion List

Re: [MBZ] The new D-C way to design cars...

2007-03-09 Thread Werner Fehlauer
Anyone who ever was in the down-wind area of the paper mills in Tacoma knows 
about the Aroma of Tacoma, which I've also experienced around Savannah, 
GA.  I can just imagine what actual contact with the chemicals can do!  Even 
a M-B wouldn't be immune to that stuff


Werner

- Original Message - 
From: Potter, Tom E [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The new D-C way to design cars...



If you guys knew the NASTY stuff that is used in paper mills, you would
not want one near you. It takes some REALLY strong chemicals to make
that white paper, and the byproducts were pumped into holding ponds near
the plants. All life in or around these ponds died of course. In the old
days, they just pumped it into the river. Just the vapors from this
stuff would eat (not just corrode) copper and brass fixtures (motor
armatures, valves, etc.). I worked near one in Brunswick, GA, for a few
months years ago. It was a learning experience.

Tom Potter





Re: [MBZ] The new D-C way to design cars...

2007-03-09 Thread Christopher McCann
when we lived in WI, we received a sheet from the doctor when my wife became 
pregnant with our first child listing the rivers NOT to eat fish out of while 
pregnant because of paper mills - Fox River was a big onemaybe that isn't 
such a bad industry to outsource...

CM

Potter, Tom  E [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you guys knew the NASTY stuff 
that is used in paper mills, you would
not want one near you. It takes some REALLY strong chemicals to make
that white paper, and the byproducts were pumped into holding ponds near
the plants. All life in or around these ponds died of course. In the old
days, they just pumped it into the river. Just the vapors from this
stuff would eat (not just corrode) copper and brass fixtures (motor
armatures, valves, etc.). I worked near one in Brunswick, GA, for a few
months years ago. It was a learning experience.

Tom Potter

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher McCann
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 9:12 AM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The new D-C way to design cars...

Interesting you bring up paper mills. For the most part, the USA is like
a third world country when it comes to paper. We export pulp as a raw
material and then re-import it as paper that is manufactured elsewhere -
most of it, I think, in Finland. Indeed, there will be no paper mills
here soon.

CM

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jim very good / truthful wisdom below.  When Caddy
came out with a truck and 
called it the escapade that was another
nail in coffin for the US auto market.  In 30 years or less there will
be no 
more US car manufactures or Paper Mills for that matter.


As a country you need to make things and sell them to ourselves and the 
world.  We did this (very well once) when we were economically great,
hungry 
and humble about it.
Now we pat ourselves on the back for being a consumer nation with a
strong 
army and navy. A service economy  We are just supporting the
demographics 
(of 320 million people all
looking for a home in the suburbs) now and not very well I might add as
the 
two class system is rising to the top again, the haves and have nots.
It 
always does
when money and things get tight.

I have heard good things about the Hyundai cars as well.  Comes from a 
people/country being hungry to achieve goodness I guess.

Regards Tom
1979 240D
- Original Message - 
From: Jim Cathey 
To: Mercedes Discussion List 
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The new D-C way to design cars...


 The following is copied from an Email sent out by AutoWeek magazine.
 While
 this may make economic sense, it seems to follow the GM/Ford/Chrysler
 model,
 and we know how well that has worked in the long haul.

 Great, GM design-by-committee!  Bodes not well for high-quality
 vehicles.  Remember that Cadillac used to be a very high quality
 car?  But now it feeds from the same GM parts trough as the
 cheapest car they make.

 If they already had a perfect door handle, there'd be no reason
 to change it for a new model.  I don't buy the argument.  They
 should have just said it's cheaper.  The fact that the sunroof,
 say, won't be matched in size to the vehicle isn't supposed to
 bother anybody.  Certainly not the accountants now running the
 show!

 And, of course, once your perfect door handle is no longer
 so perfect for the application well too bad.  Too many things
 use it for you to be able to change that one perfect handle.
 I predict stagnation in the parts supply.  Versus the well-known
 dictum grow or die.

 A co-worker just bought a new Kia, and was very favorably
 impressed with the quality he got for his money...

 -- Jim


 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 



___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Christopher McCann, happy customer of austerlitzshepherds.com
Ohne Zucht keine Leistung, ohne Leistung keine Zucht!
-2006 GSD, Anke (Yanke von der Burg Austerlitz)
-2006 GSD, Sammy (Zane von der Burg Austerlitz)
Freude an der Arbeit: Hoechste Leistung - Mercedes-Benz.
-1985 300SD, 220K miles, Wulf
-1982 300Dt, 117K miles, little blue klatter box
 
-
We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go

[MBZ] The new D-C way to design cars...

2007-03-08 Thread Werner Fehlauer
The following is copied from an Email sent out by AutoWeek magazine.  While 
this may make economic sense, it seems to follow the GM/Ford/Chrysler model, 
and we know how well that has worked in the long haul.



  Mercedes' Common Components
  M-B will develop cars that share subsystems

   By TONY LEWIN | AUTOMOTIVE NEWS

  AutoWeek | Updated: 03/07/07, 10:53 am et

STUTTGART - Mercedes-Benz is changing the way it develops new models.

Under the new system, engineers will choose from a growing supply of common 
components to build new cars. Previously, engineers developed dedicated 
systems for each new model series.

We no longer have five different handles for five different vehicles, 
Mercedes CEO Dieter Zetsche told Automotive News Europe at last month's 
presentation of the new C class, the first model to benefit from the new 
process. We have one perfect handle.

Part of the change includes the restructuring of the carmaker's engineering 
and development teams.

We have switched from a vertical organization where the chief engineer was 
running the show to a situation where you have component teams that develop 
leading-edge systems that different models can share, Zetsche said.

Some other examples of cost sharing among car lines include common seat 
structures, electronic architectures, sensors, wiring and software. Mercedes 
also went from using six sunroofs to one, reducing the cost by 25 percent.

The new C class will share its new electronic architecture with all future 
Mercedes models. In addition, the C class uses the same climate control 
module as the recently revised E class and the same front axle as its 
predecessor C class.

Asked to quantify the savings, Zetsche said: I could, but I won't. 
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 43 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20070308/860245ed/attachment.gif
 


Re: [MBZ] The new D-C way to design cars...

2007-03-08 Thread Jim Cathey
The following is copied from an Email sent out by AutoWeek magazine.  
While
this may make economic sense, it seems to follow the GM/Ford/Chrysler 
model,

and we know how well that has worked in the long haul.


Great, GM design-by-committee!  Bodes not well for high-quality
vehicles.  Remember that Cadillac used to be a very high quality
car?  But now it feeds from the same GM parts trough as the
cheapest car they make.

If they already had a perfect door handle, there'd be no reason
to change it for a new model.  I don't buy the argument.  They
should have just said it's cheaper.  The fact that the sunroof,
say, won't be matched in size to the vehicle isn't supposed to
bother anybody.  Certainly not the accountants now running the
show!

And, of course, once your perfect door handle is no longer
so perfect for the application well too bad.  Too many things
use it for you to be able to change that one perfect handle.
I predict stagnation in the parts supply.  Versus the well-known
dictum grow or die.

A co-worker just bought a new Kia, and was very favorably
impressed with the quality he got for his money...

-- Jim




Re: [MBZ] The new D-C way to design cars...

2007-03-08 Thread Christopher McCann
What do the Japanese do?

Chris

Jim Cathey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  The following is copied from an Email 
sent out by AutoWeek magazine.  
 While
 this may make economic sense, it seems to follow the GM/Ford/Chrysler 
 model,
 and we know how well that has worked in the long haul.

Great, GM design-by-committee!  Bodes not well for high-quality
vehicles.  Remember that Cadillac used to be a very high quality
car?  But now it feeds from the same GM parts trough as the
cheapest car they make.

If they already had a perfect door handle, there'd be no reason
to change it for a new model.  I don't buy the argument.  They
should have just said it's cheaper.  The fact that the sunroof,
say, won't be matched in size to the vehicle isn't supposed to
bother anybody.  Certainly not the accountants now running the
show!

And, of course, once your perfect door handle is no longer
so perfect for the application well too bad.  Too many things
use it for you to be able to change that one perfect handle.
I predict stagnation in the parts supply.  Versus the well-known
dictum grow or die.

A co-worker just bought a new Kia, and was very favorably
impressed with the quality he got for his money...

-- Jim


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


 
-
The fish are biting.
 Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 08 16:52:40 2007
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.171])
by server8.arterytc8.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1HPLr4-0004uY-6O
for mercedes@okiebenz.com; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:52:40 +
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id s2so975945uge
for mercedes@okiebenz.com; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 08:52:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.115.77.1 with SMTP id e1mr202441wal.1173372749546;
Thu, 08 Mar 2007 08:52:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.115.92.4 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 08:52:29 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 11:52:29 -0500
From: Levi Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.9.cp2
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Resister to lower voltage to use LEDS as small lights
X-BeenThere: mercedes@okiebenz.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9.cp2
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
List-Id: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes_okiebenz.com.okiebenz.com
List-Unsubscribe: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com, 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Archive: http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com
List-Post: mailto:mercedes@okiebenz.com
List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com, 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:52:41 -

They are jarring.  But that's part of why they work well.  It tends to get
people's attention more.  I don't have them on my car, But I agree, on a
dark night when you're directly behind someone they sometimes seem a little
too bright, but they certainly get my attention more than normal ones...
But other than brake lights, I don't think I've ever had an application
where the instantaneous on was even noticeable, let alone a problem...

Levi

On 3/8/07, Jim Cathey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Agreed.  They have 12v automotive applications for LED's all over.
  I've
  bought some LED trailer lights.  Guess what?  They work.  Much better
  than
  regular ones too.

 I hate them.  But if they'd just put some soft-start logic in
 there for the brake light function I'd be happy again.  I just
 hate that bright instantaneous flash when compared to filament
 thermal lag.  I find it jarring.  Same with red LED stoplights.

 -- Jim


 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] The new D-C way to design cars...

2007-03-08 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
hell they always in the past had quite a few items that were the same on 
all models, wonder why they would have got away from that in the first 
place.


Werner Fehlauer wrote:
The following is copied from an Email sent out by AutoWeek magazine.  While 
this may make economic sense, it seems to follow the GM/Ford/Chrysler model, 
and we know how well that has worked in the long haul.





--
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
 (2x) 91 300D 2.5 Turbo, 90 420SEL, 89 560SEL,
 87 300SDL, 85 380SE 5.0 Euro, 84 190D 2.2,
 81 240D, 76 240D, 76 300D, 72 250C, 69 250
http://www.okiebenz.com