Re: [MBZ] Belt tensioning lever replacement - 602.962

2005-11-26 Thread Marshall Booth
OK Don wrote: I was using the torque wrench, but don't think I reached much more than 40-50 Lb/Ft. before it started feeling scary. I remember Dave's ordeal -- Guess I was hoping that the '90 model would have been improved already. Have there been any reports of successfully replacing the

Re: [MBZ] Belt tensioning lever replacement - 602.962

2005-11-26 Thread OK Don
You DON'T replace the bearings, you replace the complete arm/bearing assembly. I've done it half a dozen times without any problem. If the threads ARE damaged, you MAY not be able to use the damaged cover or if you use it, it may fail unexpectedly. I did replace the whole assembly, but kept

Re: [MBZ] Belt tensioning lever replacement - 602.962

2005-11-26 Thread Jim Cathey
Have there been any reports of successfully replacing the bearings in the lever arm?? Our SDL ate its new tensioner arm's bearings in what I consider to be short order (two years?), so I replaced the bearing in it. The original is an odd size, a double-race job that is quite deep. I couldn't

Re: [MBZ] Belt tensioning lever replacement - 602.962

2005-11-25 Thread Marshall Booth
OK Don wrote: I replaced the badly worn belt tensioner lever (and pulley) on the '90 300D 2.5. last Wed. (beautiful day - 65F, sunny). The bolt that holds the assembly to front of the timing case is supposed to be torqued to 100NM, about 74Lb/Ft. I don't know how far I got, but as I was