Hi,
I am verry sorry for you,
As long as you do not change your account information (including password)
the server will not be confused. I once had a software failure leading to
the same problems and took over some assignments from other teammembers who
decided to quit from the project.
Kind Re
Are you talking about a linux system?!
Add a cron job executing:
ifup ppp0 (or your distro's equivalent to get up the dail up link)
sleep 10
mprime -c
sleep 5
ifdown ppp0
Every week for instance (also configure mprime accordingly)
Configure mprime to not contact priment automatically.
Kind reg
>
> I think it is more the following situatiuon:
>
> 95+% done, connecting to prime.net -> GET NEW WORK !! -> start with new
> work !
>
> After 5-7% the old workfile gets it's active flag back and will be
> completed.
>
> This situation is really b*llsh*t, imagine the new number is very high,
> i
You could even make a shadow mprime install on your own pc that you use
exclusively to keep your mothers exponent alive. You could also set the auto
check in time on your mothers machine to a large value. (maybe even +
holidays (on / no comm) when you are there)
- Original Message -
From:
Actually given the right imaging equipment around the haystack locating a
needle in a haystack should take less than 1 minute.
A low cost version w/o imaging could probaly do it in about 1 hour (strong
magnet + pulling the haystack out of order)
- Original Message -
From: "mohk" <[EMAIL P
Achim Passauer wrote:
> Hi all again,
>
> Dietmar, thanks for your answer. Well that might be an explanation but to
> move thousands of exponents from the cleared list to the still-to-do-list
> would also mean a major setback, wouldn´t it? And I´d highly appreciate to
> be informed about that by
Hello
It seems like the primenet statistics got wrong one way or another, all
activity since the 12th of this month has been removed from my activity
report. How serious is this (only temporary / not temporary but final
results checked in are ok / not ok at all checked in final results are lost)
Hello,
if that what you describe is the problem the solution is obvious
If a client checked out an (set of) exponent(s) and has not returned it yet
just re-assign that same (set of) exponent(s).
It could also be that some user does this on purpose for instance someone
with
5 machines behind a f
I have verified the possibility of a buffer overflow exploit in primenet.c
(used in linuxs mprime)
It seems NOT vurneralbe (so it seems safe to me)
NO buffer overflow is likely to occur.
Notwithstanding I am running mprime as user mersenne with virtually no
rights
and no shell.
_
> >
> > I agree this is a good idea, although the 7-day grace period
> may be a little
> > drastic. But even reducing that just from 60 to 30 days (along
> with a 7-day
> > default check in) would release abandoned exponents in 37 days
> instead of
> > 88. This would recycle them more than twice a
Hello,
because of the discussion about the speed on the slowest exponents I did
some calculations:
Result:
The limits like 750 MHz or even 350 MHz for the smalles exponents are
completely ridiculous, certainly if we do not take into account the number
of it is on, a 1000 MHz machine on for 8x5 ho
Actually as long as you have not started you assignment and you do
intermediairy check ins of status, and the assignment is finished before you
started working on it, it will be dropped from your assignment list, it only
stays if you are already working on it.
Martijn
- Original Message
Hi
Get your machine to finish this assignment off, this is not a double
checking assignment, when you finish this assignment you will be credited
with double checking credits (Exactly the same as when you do a first
check.) It helps the project very much to finish this kind of assignment, as
this
Hi
Get your machine to finish this assignment off, this is not a double
checking assignment, when you finish this assignment you will be credited
with double checking credits (Exactly the same as when you do a first
check.) It helps the project very much to finish this kind of assignment, as
this
Hi,
If you want double-checks, you can indicate this in the setup, go to the
test/primenet menu, here you can
indicate the type of work you want to do, this overrides the cpu setting. I
can see that your exponent
was reserved 2,4 days ago and expires in 85,6 days. After 88 days your
exponent expi
Depending on CPU power and preferences (which may override CPU power)
you get factoring, first time LL or double check, Smallest exponents are
given out
first. All exponents which are overdue are added to the list again around 6
AM GMT
These exponents may still be finished by the original owner, t
Hi,
It is a first time test, I do not care to run some double checks,
the problem however is
that I cannot even put double-check in the worktodo file, the
assignment will be deleted as soon as the primenet server is
contacted. It says it already has a result for the exponent.
I think I will b
Stefan Struiker wrote:
>
> A garland of 404s beyond the / of /ips. Yet results are still received,
> and the Entropia Home page displays. Never knew I'd miss the weekend
> stats so much.
>
> Sigh,
> Stefanovic
prepend www to entropia.com and it works
--
http://jkf.penguinpowered.com
Linux
gordon spence wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am getting very frustrated by the following and am searching for clues
>
> PC1 (P133/128mb/Win2000) is running the PrimeNet Proxy software plus V20 in
> double checking mode
>
> This machine is also the *Internet* proxy for my home lan. The Internet
>
Note that Mfactor (as currently configured)
> doesn't support putting multiple exponents into a to-do
> file, so the best way to trial factor lots of exponents
> is probably just to paste the one-line inputs needed for
> the exponents, one after another, into the same window -
> when the program
Hello,
The new view works ok, I even tested the site-map with lynx, it works!
I definety like this look. Count me also in on the votes against frames
please. I also do not find the text wrapping around the sitemap very
nice. I like the broad left margin model better.
Kind Regards, Martijn
Geor
Henrik Olsen wrote:
>
> On Sun, 16 Apr 2000, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> > At 14:51 15.04.2000 +0200, Henrik Olsen wrote:
> > >On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Brian J. Beesley wrote:
> > > > On 15 Apr 00, at 4:22, Henrik Olsen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I just tried downloading 20.3, both mprime and spri
George Woltman wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> At 10:56 AM 4/15/00 -0700, Will Edgington wrote:
> >near line
> >761 of linux/primenet.c, where there's an fopen("/proc/net/route",
> >"r") inside an #ifdef __linux__. Look lower down, after the #endif,
> >and note that __FreeBSD__ doesn't have a similar check;
Henrik Olsen wrote:
>
> On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Brian J. Beesley wrote:
> > On 15 Apr 00, at 4:22, Henrik Olsen wrote:
> >
> > > I just tried downloading 20.3, both mprime and sprime, as well as tried
> > > with mprime 19.0.2 . None of them where able to detect the network as
> > > being available o
Martijn Kruithof wrote:
Hello, all
Furthermore since the 20.62 % is completed it is only stepping
percentage as fast as the
P-1 phase normally went, the other instance finished the P-2 withing 6
hours!
(This one clearly not)
Could anyone provide me with a beta #3 mprime so that I can rerun the
Hello all,
This happened on my machine while switching from beta 3 to beta 4 is
this correct?
Starting P-1 factoring on M33237229 with B1=33, B2=264
Chance of finding a factor is an estimated 4.08%
P-1 on M33237229 with B1=33, B2=264
M33237229 stage 2 is 12.08% complete. Time: 18
Hi Martijn,
>
> At 07:15 AM 4/7/00 +0200, Martijn Kruithof wrote:
> >A small suggestion for the V20 is also to output the P-1 factoring
> >progress information once in a while to the results file.
>
> OK. The next version will work the same way LL testing and factori
Hi,
A small suggestion for the V20 is also to output the P-1 factoring
progress information once in a while to the results file. I have
currently 3 cpu's doing P-1 factoring, and I do not see anything
at all in the results file. Furthermore the machines busy P-1
factoring do not update anythi
Hello,
Currently I am running mprime on NT and Linux on a dual box
separately, now I got a shared partition and I want just to
go on with one assignment a time per cpu. Can I merge the
worktodo files and just copy over all the files to one directory?
(renaming the files from linux to the "stan
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Kriesel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 5:31 AM
Subject: Re: Mersenne: $1 Million For Proof Of Goldbach's Conjecture?
> >On 20 Mar 00, at 19:01, Stefan Struiker wrote:
> >
> >>LONDON , March 17
30 matches
Mail list logo
