Re: Mersenne: Version 20 memory questions

2000-02-03 Thread Barry Hansen
Here is one (lonely?) vote to set the defaults rather high. I have some over-generalizations that encourage you to let the system manage memory itself. I expect that Mersenne generally runs on the fastest machines, which tend to have lots of memory. I think it's great we can put it to use! If

Re: Mersenne: Version 20 memory questions

2000-02-01 Thread David J. Zook
For a machine with 64 MB and up, defaulting to ON during night hours would seem OK to me (I have 144 MB). However, I assume that it will be possible to specify (change) what hours are the ON hours. I suppose that midnight to 06:00 would be fine for most people, as a default. It should be

Re: Mersenne: Version 20 memory questions

2000-02-01 Thread Brian J. Beesley
On 31 Jan 00, at 11:38, George Woltman wrote: GIMPS has always had a good reputation for not interfering with your normal work. To preserve GIMPS' reputation, I'm thinking of implementing the following. In the Options/CPU dialog, prime95 will let you select the maximum amount of memory

Re: Mersenne: Version 20 memory questions

2000-02-01 Thread Pierre Abbat
However, I assume that it will be possible to specify (change) what hours are the ON hours. I suppose that midnight to 06:00 would be fine for most people, as a default. This probably depends on your distro. Red Hat and Mandrake run their crontabs between 4 and 5 in the morning, so that hour may

Re: Mersenne: Version 20 memory questions

2000-02-01 Thread Harald Tveit Alvestrand
At 20:58 31.01.00 -0500, David Campeau wrote: If you always leave 20% of ram to the system to work with, there should not be a problem. I wonder how you're going to find out that there's anything left. *ALL* of my NT systems routinely run with a commit charge around double physical memory

Mersenne: Version 20 memory questions

2000-01-31 Thread George Woltman
Hi all, I'm working on prime95 version 20. The important new feature is a P-1 factoring step prior to a Lucas-Lehmer test. The P-1 factoring step has a 3-5% chance of finding a factor at a cost of 2-4% of an LL test. The net effect is we speed up GIMPS' throughput by a percent or two

Re: Mersenne: Version 20 memory questions

2000-01-31 Thread Jud McCranie
At 11:38 AM 1/31/00 -0500, George Woltman wrote: Would we be better off disabling P-1 factoring unless the user explicitly activates it (knowing that most users won't read enough to turn it on)? That sounds like a good idea to me. Giving up 24-48MB would interfere with some people's work,

Mersenne: Version 20 memory questions

2000-01-31 Thread Louis Towles
This is one vote for memory conumsion by default stays at 4ish MB, and only if you change it on the advanced menu will it use more. I know too many people who never read the docs and will have no idea why their computer "got slow" when they put on ver. 20 and will just want it taken off. Louis

Re: Mersenne: Version 20 memory questions

2000-01-31 Thread Alan Powell
George Here is another vote for P-1 to default to off unless it is explicitly enabled using the Advanced Menu like ECM. Regards Alan Powell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Unsubscribe list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm

Re: Mersenne: Version 20 memory questions

2000-01-31 Thread John R Pierce
GIMPS has always had a good reputation for not interfering with your normal work. To preserve GIMPS' reputation, I'm thinking of implementing the following. In the Options/CPU dialog, prime95 will let you select the maximum amount of memory the program can use and the hours of the day it