On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 9:42 AM, Ville Syrjälä <
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 04:43:15PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On 14 February 2018 at 16:27, Jason Ekstrand
> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 3:39 AM, Daniel Stone
> wrote:
> > >> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 04:43:15PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On 14 February 2018 at 16:27, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 3:39 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Daniel Stone
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> For actual scanout, the kernel very specifical
On 14 February 2018 at 17:23, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 8:43 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> Linear is unchanged as it's implicit. X tiling has to take the
>> workaround, in case anyone wants to display it.
>
> I'm not sure I buy that. From a userspace perspective, you shouldn't
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 8:43 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On 14 February 2018 at 16:27, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 3:39 AM, Daniel Stone
> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Daniel Stone
> wrote:
> >> >> For actual scanout, the kernel very specifically demands
On 14 February 2018 at 16:27, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 3:39 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Daniel Stone
>> > wrote:
>> >> For actual scanout, the kernel very specifically demands that if the
>> >> BO is X-tiled, then set_tiling be called wi
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 3:39 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 13 February 2018 at 22:15, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Daniel Stone
> wrote:
> >> On 9 February 2018 at 23:43, Jason Ekstrand
> wrote:
> >> For actual scanout, the kernel very specifically demands
On 14 February 2018 at 11:39, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On 13 February 2018 at 22:15, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
>>> On 9 February 2018 at 23:43, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>>> For actual scanout, the kernel very specifically demands that if the
>>> BO
Hi,
On 13 February 2018 at 22:15, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> On 9 February 2018 at 23:43, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> For actual scanout, the kernel very specifically demands that if the
>> BO is X-tiled, then set_tiling be called with TILING_X
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> On 9 February 2018 at 23:43, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > - /* For images using modifiers, we require a dedicated
> allocation
> > - * and we set the BO tiling to match the tiling of the
> underlying
> > -
Hi Jason,
On 9 February 2018 at 23:43, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> - /* For images using modifiers, we require a dedicated allocation
> - * and we set the BO tiling to match the tiling of the underlying
> - * modifier. This is a bit unfortunate as this is completely
> -
For a bit there, we had a bug in i965 where it ignored the tiling of the
modifier and used the one from the BO instead. At one point, we though
this was best fixed by setting a tiling from Vulkan. However, we've
decided that i965 was just doing the wrong thing and have fixed it as of
50485723523d
11 matches
Mail list logo
