>
>
> This is great stuff, and it couldn't have been in better timing. I was
> just about to get the python gallium tests we have working with llvmpipe
> too, and your work will save me a bunch of time.
>
You can also use the framework to write tests in C/C++, which, using a bit
of framework over
On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 01:37 -0800, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> This is a series of 4 patches that add the required infrastructure for
> writing Gallium demos and programs and include two such demos,
> galliumgears and galliumglobe.
>
> The first two patches have already been posted, but I am including
On Friday 01 January 2010 06:42:18 Corbin Simpson wrote:
> Couple things.
>
> First, if we're going to start autogenerating headers, can we do GL
> API first?
As long as we first fix the Exchange integration in KMail (i.e. it's a bit
unfair to bring up mysterious unrelated features as a problem
Couple things.
First, if we're going to start autogenerating headers, can we do GL
API first? I've got a handful of patches against those Python scripts,
and I can always sit down in a couple days and bang out the rest of
it.
(While we're at it, since we're doomed to bring it up every couple
mont
Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Luca,
>
> This is an impressive body of work. I want to give Jose a chance to
> review the EGL/GLX extensions before pushing, but in the meantime I hope
> it's ok if I make a couple of quick suggestions/requests:
>
> Firstly, we're going to be evolving the TGSI instruction
Luca,
This is an impressive body of work. I want to give Jose a chance to
review the EGL/GLX extensions before pushing, but in the meantime I hope
it's ok if I make a couple of quick suggestions/requests:
Firstly, we're going to be evolving the TGSI instruction set a fair bit
over the coming mon
