Re: [meta-intel] outdated dpdk-dev-libibverbs
Nevermind, I see you figured it out! Thanks, Cal On 03/14/2018 11:14 AM, Cal Sullivan wrote: Hmm, I'm not sure. Are you subscribed to the list? IIRC I had to manually approve your initial mail. Could be related. Thanks, Cal On 03/14/2018 04:01 AM, Belal, Awais wrote: Hi Cal, Thanks a lot for the reply. >> If you (or any other users of meta-intel-dpdk on the list) could test using upstream libibverbs it would be much appreciated. I could then fix it >> to use upstream libibverbs or take a patch for it. I'll have a look in near future hopefully. Right now I am trying to send a patch to meta-intel@yoctoproject.org using git send-email but it is failing with "550 5.7.1 Unable to relay", any pointers? BR, /Awais/ *From:* Cal Sullivan <california.l.sulli...@intel.com> *Sent:* Saturday, March 10, 2018 4:17 AM *To:* Belal, Awais; meta-intel@yoctoproject.org *Subject:* Re: [meta-intel] outdated dpdk-dev-libibverbs Hi Awais, I don't know the history of why that version of libibverbs was used instead. Considering it no longer exists, I agree that it should be changed. Unfortunately I don't have any experience and likely lack the hardware for using dpdk, so I can only go as far as making sure it builds OK. If you (or any other users of meta-intel-dpdk on the list) could test using upstream libibverbs it would be much appreciated. I could then fix it to use upstream libibverbs or take a patch for it. Thanks, Cal On 03/09/2018 03:02 AM, Belal, Awais wrote: Hi, I was going through the meta-dpdk layer () and the actual dpdk package depends on dpdk-dev-libibverbs. Now, looking at the recipe for dpdk-dev-libibverbs it uses and outdated SRC_URI for fetching the sources (the actual tarball pointed to: does not exist) and the yocto mirror is used to fetch the tarball instead. Are there any plans of fixing/updating this? Why isn't this using a generic libibverbs source? BR, /Awais/ -- ___ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
Re: [meta-intel] outdated dpdk-dev-libibverbs
Hmm, I'm not sure. Are you subscribed to the list? IIRC I had to manually approve your initial mail. Could be related. Thanks, Cal On 03/14/2018 04:01 AM, Belal, Awais wrote: Hi Cal, Thanks a lot for the reply. >> If you (or any other users of meta-intel-dpdk on the list) could test using upstream libibverbs it would be much appreciated. I could then fix it >> to use upstream libibverbs or take a patch for it. I'll have a look in near future hopefully. Right now I am trying to send a patch to meta-intel@yoctoproject.org using git send-email but it is failing with "550 5.7.1 Unable to relay", any pointers? BR, /Awais/ *From:* Cal Sullivan <california.l.sulli...@intel.com> *Sent:* Saturday, March 10, 2018 4:17 AM *To:* Belal, Awais; meta-intel@yoctoproject.org *Subject:* Re: [meta-intel] outdated dpdk-dev-libibverbs Hi Awais, I don't know the history of why that version of libibverbs was used instead. Considering it no longer exists, I agree that it should be changed. Unfortunately I don't have any experience and likely lack the hardware for using dpdk, so I can only go as far as making sure it builds OK. If you (or any other users of meta-intel-dpdk on the list) could test using upstream libibverbs it would be much appreciated. I could then fix it to use upstream libibverbs or take a patch for it. Thanks, Cal On 03/09/2018 03:02 AM, Belal, Awais wrote: Hi, I was going through the meta-dpdk layer () and the actual dpdk package depends on dpdk-dev-libibverbs. Now, looking at the recipe for dpdk-dev-libibverbs it uses and outdated SRC_URI for fetching the sources (the actual tarball pointed to: does not exist) and the yocto mirror is used to fetch the tarball instead. Are there any plans of fixing/updating this? Why isn't this using a generic libibverbs source? BR, /Awais/ -- ___ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
Re: [meta-intel] outdated dpdk-dev-libibverbs
Hi Cal, Thanks a lot for the reply. >> If you (or any other users of meta-intel-dpdk on the list) could test using >> upstream libibverbs it would be much appreciated. I could then fix it >> to >> use upstream libibverbs or take a patch for it. I'll have a look in near future hopefully. Right now I am trying to send a patch to meta-intel@yoctoproject.org using git send-email but it is failing with "550 5.7.1 Unable to relay", any pointers? BR, Awais From: Cal Sullivan <california.l.sulli...@intel.com> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2018 4:17 AM To: Belal, Awais; meta-intel@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [meta-intel] outdated dpdk-dev-libibverbs Hi Awais, I don't know the history of why that version of libibverbs was used instead. Considering it no longer exists, I agree that it should be changed. Unfortunately I don't have any experience and likely lack the hardware for using dpdk, so I can only go as far as making sure it builds OK. If you (or any other users of meta-intel-dpdk on the list) could test using upstream libibverbs it would be much appreciated. I could then fix it to use upstream libibverbs or take a patch for it. Thanks, Cal On 03/09/2018 03:02 AM, Belal, Awais wrote: Hi, I was going through the meta-dpdk layer () and the actual dpdk package depends on dpdk-dev-libibverbs. Now, looking at the recipe for dpdk-dev-libibverbs it uses and outdated SRC_URI for fetching the sources (the actual tarball pointed to: does not exist) and the yocto mirror is used to fetch the tarball instead. Are there any plans of fixing/updating this? Why isn't this using a generic libibverbs source? BR, Awais -- ___ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
Re: [meta-intel] outdated dpdk-dev-libibverbs
Hi Awais, I don't know the history of why that version of libibverbs was used instead. Considering it no longer exists, I agree that it should be changed. Unfortunately I don't have any experience and likely lack the hardware for using dpdk, so I can only go as far as making sure it builds OK. If you (or any other users of meta-intel-dpdk on the list) could test using upstream libibverbs it would be much appreciated. I could then fix it to use upstream libibverbs or take a patch for it. Thanks, Cal On 03/09/2018 03:02 AM, Belal, Awais wrote: Hi, I was going through the meta-dpdk layer () and the actual dpdk package depends on dpdk-dev-libibverbs. Now, looking at the recipe for dpdk-dev-libibverbs it uses and outdated SRC_URI for fetching the sources (the actual tarball pointed to: does not exist) and the yocto mirror is used to fetch the tarball instead. Are there any plans of fixing/updating this? Why isn't this using a generic libibverbs source? BR, /Awais/ -- ___ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
[meta-intel] outdated dpdk-dev-libibverbs
Hi, I was going through the meta-dpdk layer () and the actual dpdk package depends on dpdk-dev-libibverbs. Now, looking at the recipe for dpdk-dev-libibverbs it uses and outdated SRC_URI for fetching the sources (the actual tarball pointed to: does not exist) and the yocto mirror is used to fetch the tarball instead. Are there any plans of fixing/updating this? Why isn't this using a generic libibverbs source? BR, Awais -- ___ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
