[meta-ti] [PATCH] linux-bb.org_git.bb: Fix build with gcc-13

2023-05-12 Thread Khem Raj
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- ...s-Fix-build-for-upcoming-GCC-release.patch | 46 +++ ...void-64-bit-division-in-ioc_timer_fn.patch | 57 +++ ...-gcc13-keep-large-values-in-a-new-en.patch | 55 ++ .../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-bb.org_git.bb | 4 ++ 4

[meta-ti] [PATCH] linux-ti-staging: Fix build with gcc13

2023-02-01 Thread Khem Raj
Backport a patch from Linux mainline [1] Thanks Martin Jansa for figuring it out. [1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/f07788079f515 Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- ...a-ahci-fix-enum-constants-for-gcc-13.patch | 351 ++ .../linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb| 1

[meta-ti] [PATCH v2] layer.conf: Update LAYERSERIES_COMPAT for mickledore

2023-01-04 Thread Khem Raj
oe-core switched to mickedore [1] [1] https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=57239d66b933c4313cf331d35d13ec2d0661c38f Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- v2: Keep langdale in LAYERSERIES_COMPAT meta-ti-bsp/conf/layer.conf| 2 +- meta-ti-extras/conf/layer.conf | 2 +- 2 files

[meta-ti] [PATCH] layer.conf: Update LAYERSERIES_COMPAT for mickledore

2023-01-03 Thread Khem Raj
oe-core switched to mickedore [1] [1] https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=57239d66b933c4313cf331d35d13ec2d0661c38f Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- meta-ti-bsp/conf/layer.conf| 2 +- meta-ti-extras/conf/layer.conf | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions

Re: [meta-ti] [PATCH] linux-ti: Drop unneeded update_data calls

2022-12-02 Thread Khem Raj
for this too ? On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 12:48 PM Ryan Eatmon wrote: > > > On 12/1/2022 11:40, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 6:36 AM Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >> > >> NAK > >> > >> cmem is being removed: > >> https://patchwork.yo

Re: [meta-ti] [PATCH] linux-ti: Drop unneeded update_data calls

2022-12-01 Thread Khem Raj
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:48:05PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > datastore works dynamically we don't need the update_data calls > > anymore, so far they were no-ops, now bitbake has recently dropped this > > API and hence compile fails with core/master > > >

[meta-ti] [PATCH] linux-ti: Drop unneeded update_data calls

2022-11-30 Thread Khem Raj
(localdata.getVar('CMEM_DTSI')) 0055: 0056:d.appendVar('SRC_URI', ' file://'.join(cmem_dtsi)) Exception: AttributeError: module 'bb.data' has no attribute 'update_data' Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/cmem.inc| 2 -- meta-ti-extras/recipes-ti/includes/ti

[meta-ti] [PATCH] ffa-debugfs-mod: Remove bbappend

2022-11-23 Thread Khem Raj
The main recipe in meta-arm is gone with 5.19 kernel onwards Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- .../linux/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_%.bbappend | 5 - 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_%.bbappend diff

Re: [meta-ti] [PATCH v2 1/2] layers: Bump layer compatibility to langdale

2022-10-12 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 7:56 AM Ryan Eatmon wrote: > > > > On 10/5/2022 10:31 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > > --- > > v2: Replace kirkstone instead of adding just langdale > > > > meta-ti-bsp/conf/layer.conf| 2 +- > >

[meta-ti] [PATCH 2/2] ffa-debugfs-mod: Remove bbappend

2022-10-05 Thread Khem Raj
The main recipe in meta-arm is gone with 5.19 kernel onwards Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- .../linux/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_%.bbappend | 5 - 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_%.bbappend diff

[meta-ti] [PATCH v2 1/2] layers: Bump layer compatibility to langdale

2022-10-05 Thread Khem Raj
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- v2: Replace kirkstone instead of adding just langdale meta-ti-bsp/conf/layer.conf| 2 +- meta-ti-extras/conf/layer.conf | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/conf/layer.conf b/meta-ti-bsp/conf/layer.conf index e3542f50

[meta-ti] [PATCH] layers: Add langdale to LAYERSERIES_COMPAT

2022-09-29 Thread Khem Raj
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- meta-ti-bsp/conf/layer.conf| 2 +- meta-ti-extras/conf/layer.conf | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/conf/layer.conf b/meta-ti-bsp/conf/layer.conf index e3542f50..39e7f9eb 100644 --- a/meta-ti-bsp/conf/layer.conf

[meta-ti] [PATCH v2] ffa-debugfs-mod: Do not build for TI SOCs

2022-05-03 Thread Khem Raj
The module can not be compiled without patching kernel 5.10 This helps meta-ti to live in multi-BSP envs Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- .../linux/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_%.bbappend | 5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/ffa

[meta-ti] [PATCH] ffa-debugfs-mod: Do not build for TI SOCs

2022-05-03 Thread Khem Raj
The module can not be compiled without patching kernel 5.10 This helps meta-ti to live in multi-BSP envs Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- .../linux/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_%.bbappend | 7 +++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/ffa

Re: [meta-ti] [PATCH] uio-module-drv-test: Fix build with clang

2022-05-02 Thread Khem Raj
> > > This code is used for PRU using UIO on AM3/BBB, AM4, AM5 and DRA7. > > Yeah, I'm realizing that now and attempting to manually make the same > changes and commit them. Then we can change the SRCREV to point to the > new version. Thanks > > > > >> On 5/1/2

[meta-ti] [PATCH] cmem-mod: Fix kernel module packaging for usrmerge

2022-05-01 Thread Khem Raj
ERROR: cmem-mod-4.20.00.01+gitAUTOINC+86269258a4-0a do_package: QA Issue: cmem-mod: Files/directories were installed but not shipped in any package: /lib/modules/5.10.100-g4a12bec7d3/extra/cmemk.ko Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- meta-ti-bsp/recipes-bsp/cmem/cmem-mod_git.bb | 2 +- 1 file

[meta-ti] [PATCH] uio-module-drv-test: Fix build with clang

2022-05-01 Thread Khem Raj
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- ...-instead-of-int8_t-in-main-signature.patch | 89 +++ .../uio-module-drv/uio-module-drv-test_git.bb | 4 + 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meta-ti-bsp/recipes-bsp/uio-module-drv/uio-module-drv-test/0001-tests-Use-char-instead

[meta-ti] [PATCH] wlconf: Use nonarch_base_libdir instead of hardcoding /lib

2022-04-23 Thread Khem Raj
Helps with usrmerge builds Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- meta-ti-extras/recipes-connectivity/wlconf/wlconf_8.7.3.bb | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-ti-extras/recipes-connectivity/wlconf/wlconf_8.7.3.bb b/meta-ti-extras/recipes-connectivity/wlconf

[meta-ti] [PATCH] uim-sysfs: Specify branch and protocol for git fetcher

2022-04-03 Thread Khem Raj
bitbake git fetcher warns about protocol and fall back branches therefore be explicit about these parameters in source uri Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- meta-ti-extras/recipes-connectivity/uim/uim-sysfs_8.5.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta-ti-extras

[meta-ti] failing recipes from meta-ti for beaglebone black

2022-03-06 Thread Khem Raj
Hello all, I have run a world build for beaglebone without X11 and using sgx-ddk for graphics, there are several recipes from meta-ti which are failing, You might be interested in addressing these failures https://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Build/142444/ There are some other failures which

[meta-ti] [PATCH] layers: Bump to use kirkstone

2022-02-21 Thread Khem Raj
its not going to be backward ABI compatible with honister due to variable renaming. Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- conf/layer.conf | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf index f399ff03..c3b39c59 100644 --- a/conf/layer.conf +++ b/conf

[meta-ti] [PATCH v2] ti-sgx-ddk-km: Fix build with kernel 5.10 and musl support

2021-12-09 Thread Khem Raj
This adds a patch to fix runtime problems loading the kernel module with kernel 5.10 Adds support to build with musl targets Add yoe to recognised OE distributions Signed-off-by: Khem Raj Cc: Denys Dmytriyenko --- v2: Add upstream status to patches ...mbedded-hardfp-toolchain-w-o

Re: [meta-ti] [PATCH] ti-sgx-ddk-km: Fix build with kernel 5.10 and musl support

2021-12-09 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 2:34 PM Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 10:48:42AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > This adds a patch to fix runtime problems loading the kernel module with > > kernel 5.10 > > > > Adds support to build with musl targets &g

[meta-ti] [PATCH] ti-sgx-ddk-km: Fix build with kernel 5.10 and musl support

2021-12-09 Thread Khem Raj
This adds a patch to fix runtime problems loading the kernel module with kernel 5.10 Adds support to build with musl targets Add yoe to recognised OE distributions Signed-off-by: Khem Raj Cc: Denys Dmytriyenko --- ...mbedded-hardfp-toolchain-w-o-gnueabi.patch | 18 ...02-Fix

Re: [meta-ti] Errors with 5.10 kernel + ti-sgx-ddk on bbb

2021-11-26 Thread Khem Raj
t being recognized properly by bbb which I fixed with some aid to weston and pvr driver configuration > Paul > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2021, at 21:43, Khem Raj wrote: > > Hi > > > > I am trying to use ti-sgx-ddk-um for egl and ended up with the > > following errors.

Re: [meta-ti] Errors with 5.10 kernel + ti-sgx-ddk on bbb

2021-11-25 Thread Khem Raj
th so will 5.4 work well ? > > > --Praneeth > > > On Nov 25, 2021 3:44 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi > > I am trying to use ti-sgx-ddk-um for egl and ended up with the > following errors. I wonder > if 5.10 kernel + pvr is supposed to work on bbb. > > root@beaglebone:~# uname -a

[meta-ti] Errors with 5.10 kernel + ti-sgx-ddk on bbb

2021-11-25 Thread Khem Raj
Hi I am trying to use ti-sgx-ddk-um for egl and ended up with the following errors. I wonder if 5.10 kernel + pvr is supposed to work on bbb. root@beaglebone:~# uname -a Linux beaglebone 5.10.65-gf22103162c #1 PREEMPT Thu Oct 21 18:27:04 UTC 2021 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux

[meta-ti] [PATCH] mpm-transport: Do not use append with += operator

2021-11-04 Thread Khem Raj
this is undefined behaviour, mant times devs used them together to get the missing space at the beginning of string which append/prepend needs but thats not intended behaviour Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- recipes-ti/mpm-transport/mpm-transport_git.bb | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2

[meta-ti][PATCH] machines: Adjust to use new location of tune files in oe-core

2021-08-18 Thread Khem Raj
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- conf/machine/include/davinci.inc | 2 +- conf/machine/include/k3r5.inc | 2 +- conf/machine/include/keystone.inc | 2 +- conf/machine/include/omap-a15.inc | 2 +- conf/machine/include/omap3.inc| 2 +- conf/machine/include/omap4.inc| 2 +- conf/machine

Re: [meta-ti] [PATCH 1/2] layer: Convert to using new override syntax

2021-08-09 Thread Khem Raj
errides for SOC > families are missed and some non-overrides, like "makefile_armv7" are > incorrectly converted. And you are about a week late, anyway... :) > > -- > Denys > > > On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 12:39:30PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > Signed-off-

[meta-ti] [PATCH 2/2] layer.conf: Drop compatibility with older than hardknott releases

2021-08-09 Thread Khem Raj
New override syntax requires it Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- conf/layer.conf | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf index 0be0ef92..f399ff03 100644 --- a/conf/layer.conf +++ b/conf/layer.conf @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ BBFILE_COLLECTIONS

[meta-ti] Merge confict chunk

2021-07-14 Thread Khem Raj
Hi Denys This commit https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-ti/commit/?id=4c1d26f6282b9959b9ee10aa77b3e05ed56299fb has a merge anchor thats committed perhaps accidentally. Thanks -Khem -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online

Re: [meta-ti] [PATCH] layer.conf: add hardknott to compatible release branches

2021-03-19 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 12:50 PM Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:18:16PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > > --- > > conf/layer.conf | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff

Re: [meta-ti] doxygen recipe duplicate in meta-ti

2021-03-18 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 03:08:47AM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:55:30PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > Hi > > > > I am seeing this > > > > doxygen: > > meta-oe 1.8.20 > > meta-ti 1.8.9.1 &g

Re: [meta-ti] uim-sysfs duplicate recipes

2021-03-18 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 12:51 AM Fathi Boudra wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 06:43, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > uim-sysfs seems to be copied into several layers as seen here > > > > > http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/bra

[meta-ti] [PATCH] layer.conf: add hardknott to compatible release branches

2021-03-18 Thread Khem Raj
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- conf/layer.conf | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf index 2393e61a..6fb214c6 100644 --- a/conf/layer.conf +++ b/conf/layer.conf @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "meta-ti" BBFILE_PATTE

[meta-ti] doxygen recipe duplicate in meta-ti

2021-03-17 Thread Khem Raj
Hi I am seeing this doxygen: meta-oe 1.8.20 meta-ti 1.8.9.1 And meta-ti wins because it has higher layer priority, which is not a good thing can we use the version from meta-oe and delete it from meta-ti ? Thanks -Khem -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive

[meta-ti] uim-sysfs duplicate recipes

2021-03-17 Thread Khem Raj
Hi uim-sysfs seems to be copied into several layers as seen here http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/recipes/?q=uim-sysfs I wonder if this should be consolidated into one common place ? perhaps meta-oe or somesuch layer. If not, which one should be used when both meta-ti

Re: [meta-ti] [PATCH] u-boot-ti-staging_2020.01: Fix build on hosts with gcc10 on them

2020-11-18 Thread Khem Raj
ping On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 5:13 PM Khem Raj wrote: > > Backport a patch from upstream to fix build on distros with gcc10+ > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > --- > ...e-redundant-YYLOC-global-declaration.patch | 28 +++ > .../u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2020.01.b

[meta-ti] [PATCH] u-boot-ti-staging_2020.01: Fix build on hosts with gcc10 on them

2020-11-12 Thread Khem Raj
Backport a patch from upstream to fix build on distros with gcc10+ Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- ...e-redundant-YYLOC-global-declaration.patch | 28 +++ .../u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2020.01.bb | 4 ++- 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644

[meta-ti] [PATCH] wl18xx-calibrator: Fix build with -fno-common

2020-08-11 Thread Khem Raj
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- ...ine-EFUSE_PARAMETER_TYPE_ENMT-type-e.patch | 35 +++ .../wl18xx-calibrator_8.7.3.bb| 4 ++- 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 recipes-connectivity/wl18xx-calibrator/wl18xx-calibrator/0001-plt.h-Do

[meta-ti] [PATCH] u-boot-ti: Limit compatibility to TI SOCs

2020-05-01 Thread Khem Raj
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti.inc | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti.inc b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti.inc index 736efc0e..04ff559d 100644 --- a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti.inc +++ b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti.inc

Re: [meta-ti] [master][PATCH] layer.conf: depend on meta-arm layer

2020-04-11 Thread Khem Raj
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 3:44 PM Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > From: Denys Dmytriyenko > > Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko > --- > conf/layer.conf | 5 - > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf > index 33a7407..7848d19 100644 > ---

[meta-ti] [PATCH] README: Update mailing list address

2020-03-24 Thread Khem Raj
While here format it a little bit to make mailing list address stand out Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- README | 6 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README b/README index 778a9756..65496af4 100644 --- a/README +++ b/README @@ -18,8 +18,12 @@ distro-less (only

[meta-ti] [PATCH] layer.conf: Mark layer dunfell release compatible

2020-03-24 Thread Khem Raj
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- conf/layer.conf | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf index cf00d48d..33a74070 100644 --- a/conf/layer.conf +++ b/conf/layer.conf @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "meta-ti" BBFILE_PATTE

Re: [meta-ti] [master][PATCH] ti-cgt6x: fix packaging issue due to libc.a

2020-02-25 Thread Khem Raj
On 2/25/20 5:34 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 05:23:48PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> >> On 2/25/20 5:09 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko via Lists.Yoctoproject.Org wrote: >>> dwarfsrcfiles: >>> .../work/armv7at2hf-neon-linux-gnueabi/ti-cg

Re: [meta-ti] [master][PATCH] ti-cgt6x: fix packaging issue due to libc.a

2020-02-25 Thread Khem Raj
On 2/25/20 5:09 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko via Lists.Yoctoproject.Org wrote: > dwarfsrcfiles: > .../work/armv7at2hf-neon-linux-gnueabi/ti-cgt6x/1_8.3.2-r0/package/usr/share/ti/cgt-c6x/lib/libc.a: > not a valid ELF file > > Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko > --- >

Re: [meta-ti] ti-cgt6x bundling libc.a with unreadable ELF file header

2020-02-19 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 6:43 PM Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 02:19:38PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 12:08 PM Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 10:26:44AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > >

Re: [meta-ti] ti-cgt6x bundling libc.a with unreadable ELF file header

2020-02-12 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 12:08 PM Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 10:26:44AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > Hi > > > > Recently, I am seeing below packaging error for ti-cgt6x > > > > https://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/390526/

[meta-ti] [PATCH] ti-cgt6x: Limit it to TI SOCs

2020-02-10 Thread Khem Raj
Helps meta-ti live in a multi-BSP distributions Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- recipes-ti/devtools/ti-cgt6x_8.3.2.bb | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/recipes-ti/devtools/ti-cgt6x_8.3.2.bb b/recipes-ti/devtools/ti-cgt6x_8.3.2.bb index deee61c7..c63c3f6e 100644 --- a/recipes-ti

[meta-ti] [PATCH v3] rwmem: Delete

2020-01-01 Thread Khem Raj
Already migrated to meta-oe Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- v3: Delete recipe, its already in meta-oe now recipes-bsp/rwmem/rwmem_1.2.bb | 27 --- 1 file changed, 27 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 recipes-bsp/rwmem/rwmem_1.2.bb diff --git a/recipes-bsp/rwmem/rwmem_1.2.bb

[meta-ti] [PATCH V2] rwmem: Update to latest to Include fix

2019-12-31 Thread Khem Raj
Fixes rwmem/opts.cpp:87:15: error: 'invalid_argument' is not a member of 'std' throw std::invalid_argument(string("Unrecognized option ") + argv[optind - 1]); ^~~~ Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- v2: Just bump srcrev to include the fix which is now upstream recipes

[meta-ti] [PATCH] rwmem: Include where it is missing

2019-12-23 Thread Khem Raj
Fixes rwmem/opts.cpp:87:15: error: 'invalid_argument' is not a member of 'std' throw std::invalid_argument(string("Unrecognized option ") + argv[optind - 1]); ^~~~ Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- ...t-for-invalid_argument-and-out_of_ra.patch | 35 ++

[meta-ti] No generic license file exists for: Patrick-Powell in any provider

2019-12-22 Thread Khem Raj
Hi bitbake emits this warning during parse when meta-ti is in play WARNING: ti-cgt6x-1_8.3.2-r0 do_populate_lic: ti-cgt6x: No generic license file exists for: Patrick-Powell in any provider following recipes seems to be using Patrick-Powell license, but its not defined anywhere it seems perhaps

[meta-ti] [PATCH] libion: Fix build for multilibbed environment

2019-12-18 Thread Khem Raj
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- ...tallDirs-module-to-detect-install-pa.patch | 48 +++ recipes-devtools/ion/libion_git.bb| 4 +- 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 recipes-devtools/ion/libion/0001-cmake-Use-GNUInstallDirs-module

Re: [EXTERNAL] [meta-ti] [master/thud][PATCH v2 01/42] ti-pdk-fetch: add class for common pdk sources

2019-12-04 Thread Khem Raj
Thanks Jacob, this looks good to me. On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 11:02 AM Jacob Stiffler wrote: > > Any further comments on this updated approach? > > > On 12/2/2019 1:45 PM, Jacob Stiffler via Lists.Yoctoproject.Org wrote: > > Recently individual components and LLD sources have been combined > into

Re: [meta-ti] [PATCH v3] Fix "basehash value changed" errors and BB_NUMBER_THREADS usage

2019-12-04 Thread Khem Raj
> BB_NUMBER_THREADS="4" bitbake -c cleansstate osal-rtos > BB_NUMBER_THREADS="5" bitbake ti-ipc-rtos ti-ipc-examples-linux > > Reported here: https://e2e.ti.com/support/processors/f/791/p/825142/3059419 > Reported-by: Matthew McKee (e-mail unknown) > Suggest

Re: [meta-ti] [PATCH] meta-ti: Set the --jobs based on host cpu_count

2019-12-02 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 4:20 AM Luca Ceresoli wrote: > > Hi Khem, > > On 29/11/19 17:17, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 6:48 AM Luca Ceresoli wrote: > >> > >> From: "Kemal R. Shakir" > >> > >> Using BB_NUMBER_THREAD

Re: [meta-ti] [PATCH] meta-ti: Set the --jobs based on host cpu_count

2019-11-29 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 6:48 AM Luca Ceresoli wrote: > > From: "Kemal R. Shakir" > > Using BB_NUMBER_THREADS to set variables causes an "basehash value changed" > error when BB_NUMBER_THREADS is changed between successive builds. > > Fixes: > > ERROR: When reparsing >

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [meta-ti] [master/thud][PATCH 01/42] ti-pdk-fetch: add class for common pdk sources

2019-11-25 Thread Khem Raj
ying or tarring/untarring all the files? > > -- > Denys > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 11:24:12AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > Ideally I agree it’s best to have per component git repos > > But traditional SDKs have been monolithic > > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 a

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [meta-ti] [master/thud][PATCH 01/42] ti-pdk-fetch: add class for common pdk sources

2019-11-25 Thread Khem Raj
Ideally I agree it’s best to have per component git repos But traditional SDKs have been monolithic On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 10:50 AM Jacob Stiffler wrote: > > On 11/25/2019 1:16 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 10:12 AM Jacob Stiffler > wrote: > > On 11/25

Re: [meta-ti] [master/thud][PATCH 01/42] ti-pdk-fetch: add class for common pdk sources

2019-11-25 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 10:12 AM Jacob Stiffler wrote: > > > On 11/25/2019 12:42 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 09:14:15AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > >> On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 10:14 -0500, Jacob Stiffler wrote: > >>> Recently individual