Re: [meta-xilinx] wic creation manifest warnings with zynqmp-pmu recipe in rocko?

Here are two machines I've tried this one where I receive the above warnings: https://github.com/kratsg/meta-l1calo/blob/bumpToRocko/conf/machine/gfex-prototype3a.conf https://github.com/kratsg/meta-l1calo/blob/bumpToRocko/conf/machine/gfex-prototype4.conf Both of these include my tune-gfex-zyn

Re: [meta-xilinx] wic creation manifest warnings with zynqmp-pmu recipe in rocko?

Hi Manju, Just running something like bitbake zynq-base which is just an image inheriting from core-image plus 2 other python packages I've written (added as an install). I'm still running into lots of issues with my images with the change to rocko, so I'm not sure where I'm going wrong... G On

Re: [meta-xilinx] wic creation manifest warnings with zynqmp-pmu recipe in rocko?

> -Original Message- > From: meta-xilinx-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-xilinx- > boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Giordon Stark > Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2018 10:20 AM > To: meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org > Subject: [meta-xilinx] wic creation manifest warnings with zynqmp-pmu

[meta-xilinx] wic creation manifest warnings with zynqmp-pmu recipe in rocko?

Hi, I'm switching over to rocko, trying to get my images to compile again, and I see these warnings? WARNING: zynq-base-1.0-r0 do_image_wic: Manifest /local/d4/gstark/poky/build/tmp/sstate-control/manifest-x86_64_aarch64-zynqmp-pmu-gcc-cross-microblazeel.populate_sysroot not found? WARNING: zynq-

Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] binutils: Rebase microblaze patches for binutils v2.30

Hi Nathan, > -Original Message- > From: meta-xilinx-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-xilinx- > boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Rossi > Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2018 6:33 AM > To: Alejandro Enedino Hernandez Samaniego > Cc: meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org > Subject: Re: [met

Re: [meta-xilinx] meta-xilinx layer on Layer Index?

Hi, We are in process and we should have all layers in layer-index. There is a new requirement to run yocto-check-layer before adding it to layer-index, we are in the process and will get it updated upstream Thanks, Manju From: Giordon Stark [mailto:kra...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, March 18, 20

Re: [meta-xilinx] Pyro -> Rocko: "Nothing PROVIDES 'device-tree'" error?

Hi Nathan, On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 6:29 AM Nathan Rossi wrote: > On 18 March 2018 at 04:57, Giordon Stark wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Based on Jorge's suggestion (cc'd), I uncommented my lines in > > device-tree.bbappend to set compatible machine = ".*" for my particular > > boards as it is being do

Re: [meta-xilinx] meta-xilinx layer on Layer Index?

I see, so does meta-xilinx-contrib get added to this layer indexing too, since it is a layer? I don't see it, hence my confusion. G On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 6:29 AM Nathan Rossi wrote: > On 18 March 2018 at 03:40, Giordon Stark wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Since the meta-xilinx "layer" is really meta

Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] binutils: Rebase microblaze patches for binutils v2.30

On 8 March 2018 at 11:15, Alejandro Enedino Hernandez Samaniego wrote: > oe-core has upgraded binutils to v2.30, which caused some of our > patches to fail, rebase these along with other minimal changes to > avoid these errors and provide compatibility with latest oe-core. Unfortunately your mail

Re: [meta-xilinx] meta-xilinx layer on Layer Index?

On 18 March 2018 at 03:40, Giordon Stark wrote: > Hi, > > Since the meta-xilinx "layer" is really meta-xilinx-bsp and The root of the meta-xilinx git repository is not actually a layer. So it doesn't have an entry in the layer index. > meta-xilinx-contrib -- shouldn't this page > (http://layers.

Re: [meta-xilinx] Pyro -> Rocko: "Nothing PROVIDES 'device-tree'" error?

On 18 March 2018 at 04:57, Giordon Stark wrote: > Hi, > > Based on Jorge's suggestion (cc'd), I uncommented my lines in > device-tree.bbappend to set compatible machine = ".*" for my particular > boards as it is being done upstream... and bitbake seems to be happier with > that, but then I run int