Scott Raney wrote:
> > I was wondering if MetaCard had any planned support for the https
> > protocol, or whether this latest beta version of 2.3 can support https via
> > sockets. If this is not the case, does anyone have any pointers or other
> > information regarding ssl and https and how it wo
10:28:33 -0700 (MST)
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: https/ssl
>
> On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, martin reed wrote:
>
>> I was wondering if MetaCard had any planned support for the https
>> protocol, or whether this latest beta version of 2.3 can support https via
>&
> From: Scott Raney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 10:28:33 -0700 (MST)
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: https/ssl
>
> On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, martin reed wrote:
>
>
> Maybe. Telnet is among the more complex o
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, martin reed wrote:
> I was wondering if MetaCard had any planned support for the https
> protocol, or whether this latest beta version of 2.3 can support https via
> sockets. If this is not the case, does anyone have any pointers or other
> information regarding ssl and https
>Hello,
>
>I was wondering if MetaCard had any planned support for the https
>protocol, or whether this latest beta version of 2.3 can support https via
>sockets. If this is not the case, does anyone have any pointers or other
>information regarding ssl and https and how it works, such that it mig
Hello,
I was wondering if MetaCard had any planned support for the https
protocol, or whether this latest beta version of 2.3 can support https via
sockets. If this is not the case, does anyone have any pointers or other
information regarding ssl and https and how it works, such that it might
be