Re: Metacard 4

Hi friends, Wilhelm Sanke wrote: This may have been already noticed here, I just want to make sure: The Rev Standalone files - necessary to build standalones - of versions 4 dp3 and dp4 do not work with the Metacard Standalone Builder. Version 3.5 does. Mark Waddingham mentioned to me

Re: Metacard 4

Klaus Major wrote: Hi friends, Wilhelm Sanke wrote: This may have been already noticed here, I just want to make sure: The Rev Standalone files - necessary to build standalones - of versions 4 dp3 and dp4 do not work with the Metacard Standalone Builder. Version 3.5 does. Mark Waddingham

Re: Metacard 4

Am 07.10.2009 um 09:49 schrieb Richmond Mathewson: Klaus Major wrote: Hi friends, Wilhelm Sanke wrote: This may have been already noticed here, I just want to make sure: The Rev Standalone files - necessary to build standalones - of versions 4 dp3 and dp4 do not work with the Metacard

Re: Metacard 4

Klaus Major wrote: Am 07.10.2009 um 09:49 schrieb Richmond Mathewson: Klaus Major wrote: Hi friends, Wilhelm Sanke wrote: This may have been already noticed here, I just want to make sure: The Rev Standalone files - necessary to build standalones - of versions 4 dp3 and dp4 do not work

Re: Metacard 4

Epsecially sic transit gloria mundi. Love, Richmond. ___ metacard mailing list metacard@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard

Re: Metacard 4

Hi Richmond, Klaus Major wrote: Am 07.10.2009 um 09:49 schrieb Richmond Mathewson: Klaus Major wrote: Hi friends, Wilhelm Sanke wrote: This may have been already noticed here, I just want to make sure: The Rev Standalone files - necessary to build standalones - of versions 4 dp3 and

Standalone Building

Thanks for the clarification about a new process for standalone building in Rev version 4. From Richard's quote of the v4 engine change log: In order to achieve this, it has been necessary to implement the core operation of standalone building in the (ide) engine. This means that the

Re: Standalone Building

An addition to my last post: I found more detailed data about the creative involvement of Monte Goulding in 2004 in the Read about Standalone Builder bug (Bugzilla 2217)-text where I quote from a post of mine to the improve-revolution list on Sept 20th, 2004 (See stack Testcolors 1600 in file

Re: Standalone Building

Another additional remark: I just looked at Bug report 2217 which I sent on Sept 20, 2004, five years ago. Report #2217 New troubles with standalone building and players for multi-fields stacks is still labeled as new A last commentary from my side had been added two years later Comment

Re: Standalone Building

Wilhelm: IF the new standAlone builder forces the inclusion of spurious development properties to each control, I for one shall not be upgrading. At present, at least we can set the custompropertysets to remove any spurious rev-IDE crap if migrating a stack from RevIDE to MC-IDE, but if it becomes

Re: Standalone Building

Hi Hugh, Wilhelm: IF the new standAlone builder forces the inclusion of spurious development properties to each control, I for one shall not be upgrading. At present, at least we can set the custompropertysets to remove any spurious rev-IDE crap if migrating a stack from RevIDE to MC-IDE,

Re: Standalone Building

Hugh Senior wrote: Wilhelm: IF the new standAlone builder forces the inclusion of spurious development properties to each control, I for one shall not be upgrading. Rev doesn't add development properties during the build (unless you choose to include libraries), it just checks each control to

Re: Standalone Building

Hi Wilhelm I remember the workarounds I did to speed it up. It was interesting to me at the time to fine the issue was the difference between: fast - having a stack open (toplevel invisible) and recursively parsing through it's objects and having the slow - parsing through the objects of a