Thank you for your comments.
I will reconsider my suggestion. Also, I will think about validation
of microformats to ensure interoperability.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuya Noyori (^o^)/
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
Tatsuya Noyori wrote:
I think microformats need namespace to ensure interoperability.
How do you think about the suggestion?
No, they shouldn't. Firstly, microformats are supposed to be easy to use
and easy to parse. Introducing XML namespaces would complicate them.
Secondly, they're supposed
On 23/11/2007, Tatsuya Noyori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I would like to suggest that microformats use namespace like the
following example.
span xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
xmlns:mf=http://microformats.org/2007;
span mf:term=tel
One of the main drivers behind uf is that they build on existing tools
and knowledge. Using existing html markup means people can use WYSIWYG
tools to edit them and it also removes a small psychological for people
who are comfortable with html but put off by such syntax. uf also aims
to solve
Hello,
I would like to suggest that microformats use namespace like the
following example.
span xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
xmlns:mf=http://microformats.org/2007;
span mf:term=tel mf:scheme=http://microformats.org/2007/hcard.rng;
span mf:term=typehome/span
span
