I'd like to see this microformat integrated into hCard.
(I've just been meeting lots of VCs recently)
Paul
On 10/1/06, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy Mabbett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy Mabbett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy Mabbett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy Mabbett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Andy, one thing that might help for the species discussion is if you
could cite URLs to a
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy Mabbett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Andy, one thing that might help for the species discussion is if you
could cite URLs to a site or sites with millions (or even thousands) of
clearly obvious
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Andy, one thing that might help for the species discussion is if you
could cite URLs to a site or sites with millions (or even thousands) of
clearly obvious uses of species terminology
Are you (and everyone) content that we have
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gazza
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
The problem before was how you were going about it; asking what people
thought of the idea before you'd collected the supporting evidence.
Poppycock:
http://microformats.org/wiki/species-examples
--
Andy Mabbett
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Colin
Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Sep 23, 2006, at 11:42 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
Human being is a reference to a species, and should be marked up as
such on any page which includes it in a biological context.
That's quite a bit of extra metadata -- IIRC
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gazza
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
This is some good research Andy, and I hope they've been added to the
examples page.
P.S.
It's a wiki - feel free.
--
Andy Mabbett
Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards: http://www.no2id.net/
Free Our
Andy Mabbett mumbled the following on 24/09/2006 09:29:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gazza
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
This is some good research Andy, and I hope they've been added to the
examples page.
P.S.
It's a wiki - feel free.
It's your idea, it's your proposal, it's your research,
On Sep 23, 2006, at 10:08 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Colin
Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Sep 23, 2006, at 11:42 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
Human being is a reference to a species, and should be marked up
as
such on any page which includes it in a biological
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Colin
Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I think questions like those will help your case -- sending dozens of
links to this list will not.
Then you'd better ask TC why he asked for them.
I don't think he was asking for them to be posted to the list, but to
be put
On 9/24/06 10:08 AM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Colin
Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I think questions like those will help your case -- sending dozens of
links to this list will not.
Then you'd better ask TC why he asked for them.
I don't
Andy Mabbett mumbled the following on 22/09/2006 23:55:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
allowing/encouraging research of more esoteric or less frequently
used/published data types (species, moon/mars geolocations) on the Web.
Do you *really* think that
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gazza
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
allowing/encouraging research of more esoteric or less frequently
used/published data types (species, moon/mars geolocations) on the Web.
Do you *really* think that species names are esoteric? *boggle*
Under a definition of only
Andy Mabbett mumbled the following on 23/09/2006 12:52:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gazza
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
allowing/encouraging research of more esoteric or less frequently
used/published data types (species, moon/mars geolocations) on the Web.
Do you *really* think that species
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gazza
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Andy Mabbett mumbled the following on 23/09/2006 12:52:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gazza
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
allowing/encouraging research of more esoteric or less frequently
used/published data types (species, moon/mars
Andy Mabbett mumbled the following on 23/09/2006 15:37:
How on earth do you thing the scientific community functions?
^^^
And that brings us back round nicely to a species microformat being
esoteric, and less frequently used than recognising
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gazza
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Andy Mabbett mumbled the following on 23/09/2006 15:37:
How on earth do you thing the scientific community functions?
^^^
And that brings us back round nicely to a species microformat
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy Mabbett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
the usefulness of a supporting uF may be questionable.
P.S.
Oh, that really is a joke. How on earth do you think garden centre
functions? Do you think that of someone asks a sales assistant for a
'Sedum acre', they throw their
Andy Mabbett mumbled the following on 23/09/2006 17:25:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy Mabbett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
the usefulness of a supporting uF may be questionable.
P.S.
Oh, that really is a joke. How on earth do you think garden centre
functions?
I have no idea - uF are
On Sep 23, 2006, at 9:37 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
People use the vernacular AND taxonomic names of species in everyday
speech and writing - just read or watch any populist gardening
magazine
or television programme.
We're only concerned with examples on the web. The *-examples page
is
On 9/23/06 10:29 AM, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact, I'll wager that they do so far more
than they use 8-digit geo-spatial references, but that doesn't stop us
using geo.
I agree that geo is not currently very widely published on the web,
and if it were suggested as it's own
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gazza
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Andy Mabbett mumbled the following on 23/09/2006 17:25:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy Mabbett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
the usefulness of a supporting uF may be questionable.
P.S.
Oh, that really is a joke. How on earth do
On Sep 23, 2006, at 12:54 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
Then again, if you're going to insist that we only develop
microformats
for data types used by virtually everyone, then development work will
soon cease to be necessary.
Andy,
The motivation behind creating a Microformat is to address an
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy Mabbett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
To which can be added
National Biodiversity Network (UK)
http://www.searchnbn.net/
20,749,979 species records
Wikimedia Commons
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/
Internet Bird
On Sep 23, 2006, at 11:42 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
Human being is a reference to a species, and should be marked up as
such on any page which includes it in a biological context.
That's quite a bit of extra metadata -- IIRC the species tree has a
height of about six or seven at its
On Sep 21, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
Shall I take everyone's silence as complete agreement? ;-)
No. :-P
-ryan
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ryan
King [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Sep 21, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
Shall I take everyone's silence as complete agreement? ;-)
No. :-P
So, are you going to tell us which bit(s) you disagree with, or is it a
secret?
--
Andy Mabbett
On Sep 22, 2006, at 12:55 PM, Ryan King wrote:
On Sep 21, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
Shall I take everyone's silence as complete agreement? ;-)
No. :-P
Andy, if you're eager to move these discussions forward more quickly,
you might find it helpful to move some of them to the
On Sep 22, 2006, at 2:24 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On Sep 21, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
Shall I take everyone's silence as complete agreement? ;-)
No. :-P
So, are you going to tell us which bit(s) you disagree with, or is
it a
secret?
Neither. It's something we haven't all
On 9/22/06 12:24 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ryan
King [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Sep 21, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
Shall I take everyone's silence as complete agreement? ;-)
No. :-P
So, are you going to tell us which bit(s) you
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Scott
Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
If you get bored waiting, you could fill in a species-formats page,
which comes before brainstorming in the process.
Are you sure about that?
I don't know much about biology (like Sam Cooke), but a quick Google
search brought
On Sep 22, 2006, at 3:29 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
If you get bored waiting, you could fill in a species-formats page,
which comes before brainstorming in the process.
Are you sure about that?
I'm sure this is what the process page says:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Scott
Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Andy, if you're eager to move these discussions forward more quickly,
you might find it helpful to move some of them to the IRC channel,
where three emails in a day can be reduced to three messages in a
minute:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Scott
Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
If you get bored waiting, you could fill in a species-formats page,
which comes before brainstorming in the process.
Are you sure about that?
I'm sure this is what the process page says:
On Sep 22, 2006, at 5:23 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
If you get bored waiting, you could fill in a species-formats page,
which comes before brainstorming in the process.
Are you sure about that?
I'm sure this is what the process page says:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
allowing/encouraging research of more esoteric or less frequently
used/published data types (species, moon/mars geolocations) on the Web.
Do you *really* think that species names are esoteric? *boggle*
--
Andy Mabbett
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy Mabbett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
There should, I believe, be a microformat for the markup of plant and
animal names, to include their scientific names.
Work to date at:
http://microformats.org/wiki/species-brainstorming
Shall I take everyone's
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy Mabbett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
There should, I believe, be a microformat for the markup of plant and
animal names, to include their scientific names.
I'm tending towards this model:
sci (scientific name)
kingdom
phylum
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy Mabbett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
plant microformat
In any case, I've flagged up my proposal on the page you cited.
Or, rather, on :
http://microformats.org/wiki/plant-examples#See_Also
--
Andy Mabbett
Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards:
On 9/16/06, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Thoughts, anyone?
Sounds like a good idea to me; could be used in hCite too (since
titles often include species names and such).
Bruce
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
be aware, about 6 months ago there was also a discussion of starting a
planet species microformat. I think a more generalised version is
better, but have a read through the thread[1] so you do not make the
same mistakes and reuse any previous findings.
-brian
[1] -
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Could you start by finding real-world examples on the Web with URLs and
documenting them on species-examples page?
http://microformats.org/wiki/species-examples
I've made a start, trying to find matching pairs of pages with
42 matches
Mail list logo
