2008/8/28 Ben Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Maybe each spec should have a required minimum draft iterations before it
can go 1.0, allowing people to participate at different levels. Those
passionate about subject matter will take interest at the 0.1 stage, those
who are simply active within
Yay! Finally the sort of discussion I was hoping to kick-start.
I think 'adr' and 'geo' should certainly be considered candidates for
promoting from drafts to specs - these have been stable for ages and
don't seem to have any issues raised (at least none which don't
effect hCard, or
Hi,
I was just wondering if there's any existing mechanism for determining
the authority of hcards?
In other words, if a social graph query finds two hcards in different
locations refering to the same person are there any guidlines for
determining which should be considered authoritative if
Hello James,
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 9:39 AM, James Tindall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was just wondering if there's any existing mechanism for determining the
authority of hcards?
In other words, if a social graph query finds two hcards in different
locations refering to the same
Have a look at the representative hCard brainstorming:
http://microformats.org/wiki/representative-hcard-brainstorming
if the cards are linked, this can help you decide which to use.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello James,
On Thu, Aug
Thanks Kevin.
Also, before making negative assertions like beyond the spec or does not
exist, or *especially* before brainstorming in email (wiki is preferred for
brainstorming), consider searching the wiki or using web search to search
site:microformats.org for the terms in question.
I've
Scott Reynen wrote:
I think comparing RDFa to microformats actually hurts your argument by
suggesting they solve the same problem and reinforcing the notion that
the wider problem RDFa seeks to solve is unimportant. Rather, I would
interpret the mentions of microformats as an indication that
Hi uFers,
RDFa is going to become an official W3C standard in the next 2-3 months.
Martin McEvoy had posted something about two weeks ago on the RDFa
mailing list stating that he'd like to use RDFa to express Microformats:
Manu,
the css based approach is somethin that has come up in discussions
about semantics with fellow workers. I believe it does not trash all
of the hard work the communities have don so far. All it does, from
what i gathered, is move the semantics from html and places it in a
separate file/place.
André Luís wrote:
Manu,
the css based approach is somethin that has come up in discussions
about semantics with fellow workers. I believe it does not trash all
of the hard work the communities have don so far.
I never said the discussions trashed all of our hard work. I said that
some of the
On 28 Aug 2008, at 12:24, Manu Sporny wrote:
It will take a couple of weeks to give examples of how this will all
work, but I wanted to get feedback from this community before
proceeding. We have a fantastic opportunity in front of us now - who
in
this community thinks that we should work
Completely agreed w all of Ben Ward's points.
In addition - I would be very concerned that the microformats principles would
be compromised by any such efforts as Manu suggests, and efficiency of
parsing/parsers and other points listed are not worth compromising the
principles.
Tantek
On [Aug 28], at [ Aug 28] 4:23 , Tantek Celik wrote:
I would be very concerned that the microformats principles would be
compromised by any such efforts as Manu suggests, and efficiency of
parsing/parsers and other points listed are not worth compromising
the principles.
That, or we'd
I had misread you there, Manu. I apologize.
Thanks for clearing it up.
Those 3x bullet points are a great summary. Well done.
--
André
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Manu Sporny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
André Luís wrote:
Manu,
the css based approach is somethin that has come up in
14 matches
Mail list logo
