Please excuse me if this is not the appropriate mailing list or if
this has already been discussed (the archives have no search feature.)
It seems that Google Code is using some sort of microformat in their
project feeds. I happened to look at the Atom source for a given
project's update feed
If you're talking about their use of class=ot-logmessage etc, then
no, that isn't a Microformat[1].
It looks to me like the reason those particular classes are present
in the project updates Atom feed is that the feed is generated by the
same code that generates the project updates HTML
I read some blog posts this morning on microformats and a common
concern (and I feel a legitimate one) is the scraping of hCard's from
web sites for future generations of spammers. I believe that fear,
if left unaddressed, will kill the microformat effort. Has there been
any discussion of this?
Martin Atkins wrote:
Martin McEvoy wrote:
On your homepage: a rev=made href=http://somesite.com/;Some
Website/a
[snip]
The last thing I may add to all that is @rev is depreciated in
Microformats and HTML5, but if you mark up your pages in XHTML or
HTML4 you are still good to go
Per
It seems to me that both hAtom and hDOAP present limitations of a sort
when it comes to providing feeds for software updates. On the one
hand with hAtom, you have a generic microformat with no way of
identifying any content beyond it merely being feed content and with
hDOAP, you have no mechanism
Samuel,
Yes, it's a recurring concern, however, microformats don't deal with
authorization. That's stuff for other protocols (openid, oauth). What
they do is markup existing data, stuff that you're already publishing.
Now, you can establish a scenario where public hcards only markup a
small
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Samuel Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to me that both hAtom and hDOAP present limitations of a sort
when it comes to providing feeds for software updates. On the one
hand with hAtom, you have a generic microformat with no way of
identifying any
Hello Samuel
Samuel Richter wrote:
I read some blog posts this morning on microformats and a common
concern (and I feel a legitimate one) is the scraping of hCard's from
web sites for future generations of spammers. I believe that fear,
if left unaddressed, will kill the microformat effort.
Martin McEvoy wrote:
Hello Samuel
Samuel Richter wrote:
I read some blog posts this morning on microformats and a common
concern (and I feel a legitimate one) is the scraping of hCard's from
web sites for future generations of spammers. I believe that fear,
if left unaddressed, will kill the
On [Nov 22], at [ Nov 22] 7:09 , Samuel Richter wrote:
It seems to me that both hAtom and hDOAP present limitations of a sort
when it comes to providing feeds for software updates. On the one
hand with hAtom, you have a generic microformat with no way of
identifying any content beyond it
10 matches
Mail list logo
