Paul, what do think?
I personally think that the qa is a good idea, I belive that you
would be easily able to seperate questions and answers out and you
will be able to start infering meaning from the text inside the qa
section, however like with all microformats it is useless unless
people
I think you guys are on the right track. I'd like to encourage you to
do some market research. Start collecting examples and see what you
can distill. Here are some questions I've got:
* Are lots of people publishing questions and answers?
- My bias is yes!
* How are they doing it?
- My
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Benjamin
West [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I suspect that there are a few classes of sites publishing
QnA (which we should verify through research):
* Commercial sites offering QA to inform the public of their products
* Project/personal sites offering QA to help
Hi,
I have mentioned a QA format in the past. I was supposed to do some
research about it, however work got in the way :(
Paul
On 14/12/06, Taylor Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like Korby I'm interested in a way to semantically identify questions and answers.
Frances' suggestion of using
Hello everybody,
has someone a viewable solution in CSS for displaying the attributes of XFN?
thanks, Thomas
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
On Sep 19, 2006, at 1:52 AM, Thomas Hofmann wrote:
has someone a viewable solution in CSS for displaying the
attributes of XFN?
Thomas,
You can use advanced CSS selectors along with generated content to do
a pretty decent job:
a[rel]:after {
content: [ attr(rel) ];
}
This will
Hello both,
thanks so far. The attribute selectors were also my idea to a possibly
solution. The blog posting gave me an advanced hint. The problem I was
thinking about was also the combination of more than one value. As
described in the post an override could be a solution. But then it is
Hello everybody,
in the wiki under http://microformats.org/wiki/reltag I found:
a href=http://technorati.com/tag/tech; rel=tagfish/a
In my understanding and related to the above shown tag:
a href=http://technorati.com/tag/tech; rel=tagtech/a
I could think, that the link in the first tag
No, the example;
a href=http://technorati.com/tag/tech; rel=tagfish/a
Is explaining how although the link may be wrapped around the word
fish, the tag will still related tech.
It's sort of an example of incorrect use, but you may choose to have a
tag that was called
technology but linked to
Hello,
okay, thanks, now I've got it. But this is just the technical part.
What sense could it be to link to tech with the word fish? Does
this not confuse the reader of the text? And does the technical rule
not restrict to strong? There *has* to be an URL with the tag at the
end. Is this
10 matches
Mail list logo
