I'm not a great fan of natural language here. What if I want to write
3l33t (well, not at my age mind you), or punk, maybe use Oktober
instead of October cause I'm a (admittedly bad) poet? The human will
understand, the computer won't.
-- Fil
___
Fil wrote:
I'm not a great fan of natural language here. What if I want to write
3l33t (well, not at my age mind you), or punk, maybe use Oktober
instead of October cause I'm a (admittedly bad) poet? The human will
understand, the computer won't.
Or Chinese?
Dan
--
http://danbri.org/
On 6/28/08, Fil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a class=tag href=http://example.com/tags/NotThis;TheTag/a
We use rel='tag' heavily, even embed it in RSS to convey metadata.
Toby's suggestion would help us be compliant with µF in any case, and
not only in when the user chooses the clean URLs
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 1:33 AM, Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 00:11 +0100, Toby A Inkster wrote:
The gist of mine is more about using RDFa
to add information to hCards in order to encapsulate information
which hCard itself can't represent (height, shoe size,
Perhaps we could solve this by changing the value of the abbr title
attribute to a different, widely used date format that is both machine
and date friendly? Take the JS date format, for instance?
On 6/28/08, Dan Brickley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fil wrote:
I'm not a great fan of natural
Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
Perhaps we could solve this by changing the value of the abbr title
attribute to a different, widely used date format that is both machine
and date friendly? Take the JS date format, for instance?
Not everyone uses the same calendar. For example there are lot of blogs
André Luís wrote:
this extension would only work on xHTML, right? Or is it possible to
use rdfa in html? (I'm not that proficient in rdfa)
It's not possible to use RDFa in valid HTML and adding all the element
changes and new attributes necessary for RDFa to HTML is not part of the
current
George Brocklehurst wrote:
Is it worth revisiting Tantek's original suggestion of using the
object element to represent dates? [1]
The idea was to do something like this:
object data=20050125January 25/object
From what Tantek said on his blog, the main reason for not using
objects was
On 28 Jun 2008, at 13:03, André Luís wrote:
October
Oct.
And other languages, like Portuguese:
Outubro
Out.
This, however, could be handled with abbr, without hindering
accessibility.
span class=monthabbr title=OctoberOct./abbr/span
With the current abbr-pattern, your example should
On 28 Jun 2008, at 17:03, Ed Lucas wrote:
George Brocklehurst wrote:
Is it worth revisiting Tantek's original suggestion of using the
object element to represent dates? [1]
The idea was to do something like this:
object data=20050125January 25/object
This particular example is
On [Jun 28], at [ Jun 28] 11:09 , Ben Ward wrote:
On 28 Jun 2008, at 17:03, Ed Lucas wrote:
George Brocklehurst wrote:
Is it worth revisiting Tantek's original suggestion of using the
object element to represent dates? [1]
The idea was to do something like this:
object
On 28 Jun 2008, at 18:09, Ben Ward wrote:
I've pastied my test case, and would be grateful if people could
test the behaviour in Internet Explorer: http://pastie.org/224023
IE 6, 7 and the beta version of IE 8 all visibly render the object
element as a small box, similar to the way they
Brian Suda wrote:
if you take a look at the 'category' property, it works how you
are proposing to use 'tag'.
Yes 'category' is defined for hCard, hCalendar and (possibly - it's
ambiguous) hListing. But it's not for xFolk, hReview, hAtom or simply
tagging whole pages.
--
Toby A Inkster
Ben Ward wrote:
On 28 Jun 2008, at 17:03, Ed Lucas wrote:
object data=20050125January 25/object
This particular example is invalid, as the data= attribute must
contain a URI, and a URI cannot start with a number.
It's perfectly valid. Absolute URIs can't start with a number, but
André Luís wrote:
this extension would only work on xHTML, right? Or is it possible to
use rdfa in html? (I'm not that proficient in rdfa)
The RDFa people have only specifically defined RDFa in terms of
XHTML. This is for mostly pragmatic rather than ideological reasons -
it was far
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis:
If you want to to use RDF in an HTML context, look to eRDF
eRDF is an interesting experiment, but not particularly practical.
Probably the biggest practical problem with it is the use of the id
attribute to indicate that (by the attribute's mere presence) an
The focus seems to have drifted toward smarter parsing of dates, but the
Sure ... splitting the date into day, month and year could be workable, or
somehow describing a date format in another element, if there is a standard
way to do it and it is easy to do, but I'm opposed to anything that
17 matches
Mail list logo
