Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

2017-05-12 Thread Kevin Sullivan via Mikrotik-users
Of Kevin Sullivan via Mikrotik-users Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 2:50 PM To: 'Kevin Myers'; 'Mikrotik Users' Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load Thanks. Just for clarification, we're only see 100% load on one core, not on the router as a whole. It's started crashing OSPF

Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

2017-05-09 Thread Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users
g...@linktechs.net<mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net> From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jan-OOLLC via Mikrotik-users Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 11:37 AM To: mikrotik-users@wispa.org Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load Den

Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

2017-05-09 Thread Jan-OOLLC via Mikrotik-users
ia Mikrotik-users *Sent:* Monday, May 8, 2017 4:50 PM *To:* 'Kevin Myers' <kevin.my...@iparchitechs.com>; 'Mikrotik Users' <mikrotik-users@wispa.org> *Subject:* Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load Thanks. Just for clarification, we're only see 100% load on one core, not on t

Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

2017-05-09 Thread Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users
-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Sullivan via Mikrotik-users Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 4:50 PM To: 'Kevin Myers' <kevin.my...@iparchitechs.com>; 'Mikrotik Users' <mikrotik-users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load Thanks. Just for clarification,

Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

2017-05-08 Thread Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users
to x86 for more processing power per CPU. Don't see that many options for a pre-built x86, though. Kevin *From:*Kevin Myers [mailto:kevin.my...@iparchitechs.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, May 02, 2017 5:11 PM *To:* Kevin Sullivan; Mikrotik Users *Subject:* RE: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

2017-05-02 Thread Adair Winter via Mikrotik-users
Yep. Bgp and ccr's don't play well. x86 would be better. On May 2, 2017 11:35 PM, "Jesse DuPont via Mikrotik-users" < mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote: > He did say it was only a single core, not all cores together, that shows > 100% continuously. It is most likely BGP. > > *Jesse DuPont* > >

Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

2017-05-02 Thread Jesse DuPont via Mikrotik-users
He did say it was only a single core, not all cores together, that shows 100% continuously. It is most likely BGP. Jesse DuPont Network

Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

2017-05-02 Thread Kevin Myers via Mikrotik-users
If you're advertising a large number of routes to your 31 peers (full or partial tables) then you'll need to adjust your routing architecture somewhat and consider using the CCR1072 more for transit and offload some of the peerings with a larger number of routes onto a CHR or x86 VM with a

Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

2017-05-02 Thread Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users
esday, May 2, 2017 6:40 PM To: 'Mikrotik Users' <mikrotik-users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load For several years it's been said that multi-threaded BGP processing will be supported in RouterOS v7. And if you remember that RouterOS v7's long-awaited release

Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

2017-05-02 Thread Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users
Sounds like you have extra rules in there that is causing high load. I would have to look at it to be cirtan, but there should not be any reason for 100% cpu. Maybe on one core, but not all .. Dennis Burgess www.linktechs.net - 314-735-0270 x103 -

Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

2017-05-02 Thread Chris Wright via Mikrotik-users
For several years it's been said that multi-threaded BGP processing will be supported in RouterOS v7. And if you remember that RouterOS v7's long-awaited release was an April Fools' joke THREE YEARS AGO that'll give you an idea