50% isn't bad. I would think filling up queues or something similar is
a likely cause.
To answer your questions you shouldn't have to do anything other than
move the queues, etc. to the inside router. Give it an address out of a
/30 and the edge router the other address from the /30 and
IP services determine whether or not the router responds to requests on
that port.
Input firewall rules block packets from even getting to the IP Service.
On 10/5/2016 1:12 PM, Matthew Brendle via Mikrotik-users wrote:
> What is the difference in using Firewall Rules and the IP Services Rules?
My experience is that has almost always been a configuration error.
Often related to Router ID, but not necessarily the one reporting the
errors.
One thing MT appears to not like is Router ID of 0.0.0.0.
Duplicate IP addresses can cause this message. The packet actually came
from somewhere
Time synchronization ranks up at the top as well. Doesn't usually cause
OPs error, but it is critical.
On 12/14/2016 8:51 AM, Kevin Myers via Mikrotik-users wrote:
Just wanted to echo and reinforce the comments that Justin Wilson made about
every router that participates in OSPF needs to
I have seen funny things when the upgrade firmware is lower than the
current. Put a new version of ROS on it, upgrade the firmware and see
what you get.
On 12/15/2016 12:39 PM, Roy via Mikrotik-users wrote:
Hi,
Maybe I am getting to old or had too much eggnog last night
We just received a
The default configuration is a series of rules. It is fairly standard
across the SOHO lines.
The first time you connect to the mAP via wireless it will ask you if
you want to remove the rules or list them. So you could just delete
them and then configure from either port.
On 4/13/2017
Open a terminal window. If it was a power outage, under the banner it
will say something like reboot without proper shutdown.
Also, the very beginning of the log after power up may have some help.
The part you are showing looks like OSPF getting started.
On 3/2/2017 2:11 PM, Brough Turner
They were showing some new stuff at WispAmerica. I think they are going
to have something bigger than the 8-port, but I don't remember what all
I saw.
On 7/11/2017 1:54 PM, Jesse Dupont via Mikrotik-users wrote:
The PacketFlux SiteMonitor2 has a 5-port remotely operable, DIN
mounted PDU you
And PtMP is for Point to MultiPoint.
So, topology defines what you use. Each network type has its place.
Also, you will want all of the routers to be time-synched from the same
source.
On 6/27/2017 9:49 AM, Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users wrote:
I would suggest contacting a MT
...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Scott Reed
via Mikrotik-users
*Sent:* Tuesday, June 27, 2017 9:48 AM
*To:* mikrotik-users@wispa.org >> Mikrotik Users
*Subject:* Re: [Mikrotik Users] OSFP considerations for WISP
And PtMP is for Point to MultiPoint.
So, topology defines what you use. Each networ
Their latest newletter also announced a couple of switches that can boot
SWOS or ROS.
On 6/23/2017 9:06 PM, Blair Davis via Mikrotik-users wrote:
Exactly what I want!
Thank you!
I searched under RouterBoard, not under integrated solutions/ethernet
routers.
Thank you all again!
--
On
I am a consultant that can help with this.
I have helped several other networks move from bridged to routed and
implement OSPF as well.
Let me know if you are interested in some services and we can work out
how I can best help you.
On 6/27/2017 8:57 AM, Robert Dillon via Mikrotik-users
Why shouldn't it differ, they expect different hardware to be used for
different roles?
I am pretty sure MT does not use the same default settings across
hardware platforms, though they are similar.
I have not run into one that is not completely cleared when told to not
use it after first
This may not be the cleanest so hopefully someone will have a better
solution.
This assumes local end has static addresses.
Create a PPP (like PPTP, L2TP, OpenVPN, etc.) tunnel from the remote end
to the local end.
Run your PPPoE tunnel over that.
On 9/26/2017 2:33 PM, Nick Bright via
Yes, probably device. Forget the PPP stuff. Just use the new out facing
IP Address.
I have never seen a place to put PPP info in the Dude. It deals with IP
Addresses.
On 11/16/2017 3:43 PM, Jan Van Kort via Mikrotik-users wrote:
If I knew I wouldn't be here asking. I'm calling them POPs,
Yep.
I would suggest searching for the HTB queuing stuff. There are a couple
of MUM session recordings and some examples available.
On 11/1/2017 1:52 PM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users wrote:
Would queue tree with a parent of global maybe do something for that?
Josh Luthman
Office:
While we are getting everything on a network upgraded to avert the
infection threat on RouterOS, is there anything we can see to know that
the device is infected?
--
Scott Reed
SBRConsulting, LLC
Network and Wireless Consulting
WISPA Vendor Member
IN UMC Associate Lay Leader
SLI Coach Trained
Instead of putting the MAC in the HotSpot, put it in RADIUS as the user
ID. If the Hotspot is setup to to MAC authentication, it will pass the
MAC to RADIUS, just as if the user logged in.
On 1/21/2018 6:45 PM, ralph via Mikrotik-users wrote:
I have a lot of sites using MT Hotspot with an
They will show red if the ports are down or disabled.
On 8/1/2018 13:00, mike.lyon--- via Mikrotik-users wrote:
> I’ve taken the master-port assignment off of all ports and have assigned IP
> addressess to eth1, eth2 and eth3 and have also removed all bridges.
>
> I can setup a DHCP server on
It will also change device identity, change admin password, add Admin,
add 5 firewall filter rules to redirect forward traffic, change DNS
server, enable DDNS, add IP Web Proxy rules and more, but that is all I
remember off the top of my head.
On 8/5/2018 20:57, Bob Pensworth via
.
On 8/6/2018 6:55, Tim wrote:
This has been detected in devices with earlier versions of ROS.
*From:*mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org
*On Behalf Of *Scott Reed via
Mikrotik-users
*Sent:* Monday, August 6, 2018 5:58 AM
*To:* mikrotik-users@wispa.org
*Subject:* Re: [Mikrotik Users] Exploit in ROS
I am pretty sure you can do ranges (with a -) or a comma separated
list. Just be sure to check when you are done that it does what you want.
On 8/9/2018 12:44, Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users wrote:
> Is there a way to specify multiple to-address in a dst-nat rule?
>
> This may not even be the
Mikrotik has been know to make change to the syntax, so the new make
look different that the old.
I have upgraded 100s of units from as low as 4.15 incrementally to
6.42.8 without losing anything. Not that they have much, but upgrades
just work.
You may not be able to copy the export to
About the same here. I have pptp connections to several remote
networks. Setup routing in the local MT to know how to get to the
address ranges of each network. Everything just works. I can WinBox to
anything on any network, browse devices on private addresses, etc.
On 3/12/2018 11:28 AM,
24 matches
Mail list logo
