Am 21.09.2014 um 23:41 schrieb dw:
On 9/20/2014 8:07 AM, André Hentschel wrote:
Am 19.09.2014 um 17:30 schrieb Kai Tietz:
2014-09-19 1:34 GMT+02:00 dw limegreenso...@yahoo.com:
For the parts that are working around a compiler bug:
- Does it make sense to list the bug number in the comment?
On 9/20/2014 8:07 AM, André Hentschel wrote:
Am 19.09.2014 um 17:30 schrieb Kai Tietz:
2014-09-19 1:34 GMT+02:00 dw limegreenso...@yahoo.com:
For the parts that are working around a compiler bug:
- Does it make sense to list the bug number in the comment?
I think it makes sense in general.
Am 19.09.2014 um 17:30 schrieb Kai Tietz:
2014-09-19 1:34 GMT+02:00 dw limegreenso...@yahoo.com:
For the parts that are working around a compiler bug:
- Does it make sense to list the bug number in the comment?
I think it makes sense in general. Only important thing should be to
mark
2014-09-19 1:34 GMT+02:00 dw limegreenso...@yahoo.com:
For the parts that are working around a compiler bug:
- Does it make sense to list the bug number in the comment?
I think it makes sense in general. Only important thing should be to
mark bug-number, that it belongs to SF bug-tracker. We
Looks ok. Please apply
Thanks,
Kai
--
Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___