Hi,
Migrating a code to msys2 compilation (cmake inside msys ),mingw64 does
not find an include file for unknwon reason.
the file is located in a project defined as follow:
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.10)
project(include_commun)
add_library(include_commun INTERFACE)
Thanks for the replies with answers and information.
I now know to not rely on the defaults.
Kind regards
Disclaimer: This mail transmission and any attached files are confidential and
are intended for the addressee only. If you are not the person or organization
to whom it is addressed,
It's the mingw-w64-i686-headers-git package where it's defined. Generally
partial upgrades of MSYS2 are not supported but if you to be on your own
keep in mind crt, headers or winpthreads always have to be in the same
version.
MSYS2 had to bump WINNT because some package require Windows 7 features
On 1/10/2019 5:00 AM, Tempelaar E. (Erik) wrote:
I recently reconfigured a build environment for a mingw-built application but I
ran into issues
on Windows 10 caused by a #define _WIN32_WINNT in
C:\msys64\mingw32\i686-w64-mingw32\include\_mingw.h
In my installation it targets WINNT 0x0601
在 2019/1/10 18:00, Tempelaar E. (Erik) 写道:
> I recently reconfigured a build environment for a mingw-built application but
> I ran into issues
> on Windows 10 caused by a #define _WIN32_WINNT in
> C:\msys64\mingw32\i686-w64-mingw32\include\_mingw.h
>
> In my installation it targets WINNT 0x0601
I recently reconfigured a build environment for a mingw-built application but I
ran into issues
on Windows 10 caused by a #define _WIN32_WINNT in
C:\msys64\mingw32\i686-w64-mingw32\include\_mingw.h
In my installation it targets WINNT 0x0601
#ifndef _WIN32_WINNT
#define _WIN32_WINNT 0x601
在 2019/1/2 9:19, Óscar Fuentes 写道:
> Valerio Messina via Msys2-users
> writes:
>
>> #include
>> MB_CUR_MAX while it must store a number between 1 and MB_LEN_MAX (that
>> is almost always 16), it is of type 'size_t', so 4 Bytes on 32 bit
>> systems, and 8 Bytes on 64 bit systems. This is valid
Can you provide some details? I just downloaded MinGW-w64 (so without
MSYS2) onto a laptop running Windows 10 and created a version of the
veneral hello program with gofrtran. It ran without any difficulties.
Regards,
Arjen
Op di 25 sep. 2018 om 08:48 schreef Liu Hao :
>
> 在 2018/9/24 23:37,
Hi Bill,
with the buildgf.bat batch file as you sent it I indeed got the error
message that the 16-bits application it was trying to run was
incompatible with the system.
But then I examined the list of compile options and saw that you use
"-c" as the first and "-oLOOPFIND.EXE" as the last. This
I have attached a 7z file with one of the programs I am trying to convert. Old
legacy Fortran stuff.Hope this helps.
The file "Send.sample" should be renamed "Send.7z" before uncompressing. It
contains fortran source, a batch file to compile and link, and a data file to
run against the program.
OK I give up. Every time I try to send something, your email system bounces it
back.
Bill
From: Arjen Markus
To: lh_mo...@126.com
Cc: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net; w.brand...@ameritech.net;
msys2-us...@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 3:12 AM
Subject:
I have attached a 7z file with one of the programs I am trying to convert. Old
legacy Fortran stuff.Hope this helps.
Thanks for your help
Bill
From: Arjen Markus
To: lh_mo...@126.com
Cc: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net; w.brand...@ameritech.net;
msys2-us...@lists.sourceforge.net
Thanks! Indeed, using gendef works and I get a lot of exports
from the dll! I also checked dlltool from mingw-w64 and it does
not export anything, so gendef seems to be the way to go!
Thanks again!
On 19.08.2016 20:32, The Canadian Bacon wrote:
> I'm not an msys2 dev but have you tried
I get the same failure here [1], smallest reproducible test case so
far, unfortunately, seems to be cross compiling ffmpeg like
ffmpeg's configure
--arch=x86_64 --target-os=mingw32 --enable-librubberband --enable-gpl
then it fails (no msys2 at play at all in this case).
[1]
LRN, the author of the libitm patch of MSYS2 gcc package, suggested disabling
it:
[22:57:27] LRN, wasn't you the guy who wrote the enable-libitm patch
for MSYS2 ?
[22:57:36] s/wasn't/weren't/
[22:57:42] that is quite possible
[22:58:02] possible ? :S
[22:58:07] I don't remember
[22:58:13]
I have compiled ffmpeg with LDFLAGS='-static-libgcc -static-libstdc++' and
Stud_PE says ffmpeg.exe doesn't import anything from libitm, nor does it import
anything from libstdc++, libgcc, libiconv, etc.
I also asked it on #mingw-w64 on OFTC and people said it seemed mere
undefined references
On 25 July 2016 at 12:18, lh mouse wrote:
> I have compiled ffmpeg with LDFLAGS='-static-libgcc -static-libstdc++' and
> Stud_PE says ffmpeg.exe doesn't import anything from libitm, nor does it
> import
> anything from libstdc++, libgcc, libiconv, etc.
>
> It doesn't, by
I have compiled ffmpeg with LDFLAGS='-static-libgcc -static-libstdc++' and
Stud_PE says ffmpeg.exe doesn't import anything from libitm, nor does it import
anything from libstdc++, libgcc, libiconv, etc.
I also asked it on #mingw-w64 on OFTC and people said it seemed mere
undefined references
Recompiling GCC with
https://github.com/Alexpux/MINGW-packages/pull/1588/commits/ba282a67e971e045131291fd0f21ef786b82b1b1
seems to fix the issue for me.
I don't know enough to be sure this doesn't break anything else. The
alternative would be disabling the patch that enables libitm, but I assumed
It looks normal.
I thought it could be caused by linking a 64-bit object file against a 32-bit
library.
Fortunately, it isn't the case.
FWIW, two months ago I sent a pull request about the GCC relocation bug here:
https://github.com/Alexpux/MINGW-packages/pull/1444
A few days ago on IRC, alexey
Additionally, someone else also got these same errors with a self-compiled GCC
6[1], so it's maybe not specific to MSYS2-compiled GCC but something involving
GCC 6 and mingw-w64.
[1]
https://github.com/lachs0r/mingw-w64-cmake/commit/ac8e62c493d5ebebe61e59d1db39bfb1c08e7888
On 2016-07-24 16:14, lh mouse wrote:
> Try this command and reply with its output:
>
> objdump -f
> "C:/builds/ab/msys64/mingw64/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/6.1.0\libstdc++.a"
> | grep "cow-stdexcept.o"
>
$ objdump -f
Try this command and reply with its output:
objdump -f
"C:/builds/ab/msys64/mingw64/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/6.1.0\libstdc++.a"
| grep "cow-stdexcept.o"
--
Best regards,
lh_mouse
2016-07-24
-Original Message-
From: sisyph...@optusnet.com.au
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2016 10:31 PM
To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [MSYS2] How do I install makefinfo
> .deps/exceptions.Tpo -c -o exceptions.lo exceptions.c
> Xexceptions.Tpo
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Torri
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2016 8:41 PM
To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [MSYS2] How do I install makefinfo
> isn't it in the texinfo package ?
Indeed it is - thank you.
Having installed texinfo, the bu
isn't it in the texinfo package ?
Vincent Torri
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using dongsheng's gmp-6.1.1 (win32 threads, seh) build.
>
> I'm trying to build mpfr (svn revision 10613) in the msys2 shell and getting
> hammered early on in the
Hi,
Using dongsheng's gmp-6.1.1 (win32 threads, seh) build.
I'm trying to build mpfr (svn revision 10613) in the msys2 shell and getting
hammered early on in the 'make' stage with:
###
make[1]: Entering directory 'C:/_64/comp/mpfr-10613/doc'
restore=: &&
Great job. Thanks a lot!
--
Best regards,
lh_mouse
2016-04-15
-
发件人:Alexpux <alex...@gmail.com>
发送日期:2016-04-15 01:33
收件人:lh_mouse
抄送:mingw-w64-public,Msys2
主题:Re: [Msys2-users] [Min
ds,
> lh_mouse
> 2016-04-15
>
> -
> 发件人:"lh_mouse"<lh_mo...@126.com>
> 发送日期:2016-04-15 01:04
> 收件人:mingw-w64-public,Msys2
> 抄送:
> 主题:[Mingw-w64-public] Where can I get an up-to-data patch list for
> building a native GCC on
5 мая 2015 г., в 16:27, Baruch Burstein bmburst...@gmail.com написал(а):
Is this list also the unofficial/official msys2 list, or is there a separate
one for that?
MSYS2 have separate mailing list:
https://sourceforge.net/p/msys2/mailman/
Is this list also the unofficial/official msys2 list, or is there a
separate one for that?
--
˙uʍop-ǝpısdn sı ɹoʇıuoɯ ɹnoʎ 'sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı
--
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 12:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 is violating the GPL again
2014-12-08 19:32 GMT+01:00 Jim Michaels jmich...@yahoo.com:
is this msys2 something that applies to mingw-w64? should I be using this
instead
(computer repair info, programming)
--
*From:* Alexpux alex...@gmail.com
*To:* mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
*Sent:* Monday, December 8, 2014 3:01 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 is violating the GPL again
8 дек. 2014 г., в 13:48, Corinna
On Dec 8 20:27, Alexpux wrote:
8 дек. 2014 г., в 17:50, Corinna Vinschen написал(а):
On Dec 8 15:12, Alexpux wrote:
8 дек. 2014 г., в 14:27, Corinna Vinschen написал(а):
On Dec 8 14:01, Alexpux wrote:
Will update sf.net http://sf.net/ repo today.
Ok.
Done.
And this is
8 дек. 2014 г., в 13:48, Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com написал(а):
Hi,
I just had a look on the MSYS2 pages at sourceforge. It turned out that
the Cygwin sources provided on sourceforge,
Hi,
I just had a look on the MSYS2 pages at sourceforge. It turned out that
the Cygwin sources provided on sourceforge,
http://sourceforge.net/projects/msys2/files/REPOS/MSYS2/Sources/msys2-runtime-2.0.15816.7257e97-1.src.tar.gz/download
are very old, from 2014-02-02, while the latest binary
On Dec 8 14:01, Alexpux wrote:
Will update sf.net http://sf.net/ repo today.
Ok.
And this is only for Cygwin. The situation of the other upstream
packages isn't better. About half of the binary packages are younger
than 6 month, while the latest source archives have been updated
8 дек. 2014 г., в 14:27, Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com написал(а):
On Dec 8 14:01, Alexpux wrote:
Will update sf.net http://sf.net/ repo today.
Ok.
Done.
And this is only for Cygwin. The situation of the other upstream
packages isn't better. About half of the binary
Hi Corinna,
With fear of my life I stick my head in a hornet's nest, with some remarks:
Archlinux solved this issue some years ago, and the bug report is cause for
an interesting read with some pointers on how to solve this for the MSYS2
folks: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/5355
Any GPLv3
On 12/8/2014 20:17, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
Hi Corinna,
With fear of my life I stick my head in a hornet's nest, with some remarks:
Archlinux solved this issue some years ago, and the bug report is cause for
an interesting read with some pointers on how to solve this for the MSYS2
folks:
On Dec 8 15:12, Alexpux wrote:
8 дек. 2014 г., в 14:27, Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com написал(а):
On Dec 8 14:01, Alexpux wrote:
Will update sf.net http://sf.net/ repo today.
Ok.
Done.
And this is only for Cygwin. The situation of the other upstream
packages
On Dec 8 13:17, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
Hi Corinna,
With fear of my life I stick my head in a hornet's nest, with some remarks:
Archlinux solved this issue some years ago, and the bug report is cause for
an interesting read with some pointers on how to solve this for the MSYS2
folks:
8 дек. 2014 г., в 17:50, Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com написал(а):
On Dec 8 15:12, Alexpux wrote:
8 дек. 2014 г., в 14:27, Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com написал(а):
On Dec 8 14:01, Alexpux wrote:
Will update sf.net http://sf.net/ repo today.
Ok.
Done.
And this
:#x2F;#x2F;RenewalComputerServices.com
http:#x2F;#x2F;JesusnJim.com (computer repair info, programming)
From: Alexpux alex...@gmail.com
To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 3:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 is violating the GPL again
8
On 12/9/2014 02:32, Jim Michaels wrote:
is this msys2 something that applies to mingw-w64? should I be using this
instead of
https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/External%20binary%20packages%20%28Win64%20hosted%29/MSYS%20%2832-bit%29/
No, that is MSYS copied from mingw.org,
.
Don't underestimate MSYS2, it's quite brilliant in its relative simplicity
;-)
Cheers,
Ruben
--
*From:* Baruch Burstein bmburst...@gmail.com
*To:* mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 22, 2014 5:31 AM
*Subject:* [Mingw-w64-public
Hi,
I (think I) found a bug in msys2. Here is a simple demo case:
main.c:
int main() { return 42; }
Makefile:
CC = gcc
CC2 = $(shell which $(CC))
out_1: clean main.c
$(CC) main.c -o /home/username/out.exe
out_2: clean main.c
$(CC) /home/username/main.c -o out.exe
out_3: clean main.c
$(CC)
No, you didn't find any bug in MSYS2.
If you want MSYS2 path translation to happen then use an MSYS2
program, i.e. MSYS2 make, not mingw32-make.
--
Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Ray Donnelly mingw.andr...@gmail.com
wrote:
No, you didn't find any bug in MSYS2.
If you want MSYS2 path translation to happen then use an MSYS2
program, i.e. MSYS2 make, not mingw32-make.
Oh, OK, sorry. I thought that any program run from within msys got
Yes, the shell that is run is the bash shell for MSYS2 make and
cmd.exe for mingw32-make, and there are some other differences about
the handling of 'special' characters. By default you should use MSYS2
make, unless you have a compelling reason not to.
Similar to how msys includes a `patch.exe.manifest` file in it's 2.6.1
patch archive from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/files/MSYS/Extension/
please consider adding a manifest file to an updated release of msys2's
2.7.1 patch (i686 and x86_64) archives.
A manifest file is one of the
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Jon jon.for...@gmail.com wrote:
Similar to how msys includes a `patch.exe.manifest` file in it's 2.6.1
patch archive from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/files/MSYS/Extension/
please consider adding a manifest file to an updated release of msys2's
To confirm, the only effect of setting MSYSTEM (e.g. - setting to MSYS,
MINGW32, or MINGW64) in an MSYS2 + mingw-w64 environment is (a) uname
changes its output, and therefore (b) config.guess spews one of the
following three?
${UNAME_MACHINE}-pc-mingw64
${UNAME_MACHINE}-pc-mingw32
23 нояб. 2013 г., в 13:56, Jon jon.for...@gmail.com написал(а):
To confirm, the only effect of setting MSYSTEM (e.g. - setting to MSYS,
MINGW32, or MINGW64) in an MSYS2 + mingw-w64 environment is (a) uname changes
its output, and therefore (b) config.guess spews one of the following three?
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Alexpux alex...@gmail.com wrote:
23 нояб. 2013 г., в 13:56, Jon jon.for...@gmail.com написал(а):
To confirm, the only effect of setting MSYSTEM (e.g. - setting to MSYS,
MINGW32, or MINGW64) in an MSYS2 + mingw-w64 environment is (a) uname
changes its
Hi!
I want to ANNOUNCE that I create two pacman repositories for MinGW-w64
toolchains for MSYS2:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/msys2/files/REPOS/MINGW/i686/
https://sourceforge.net/projects/msys2/files/REPOS/MINGW/x86_64/
This toolchains builded with threads=posix no-multilib - dwarf and
2013/11/20 Alexey Pavlov alex...@gmail.com
Hi!
I want to ANNOUNCE that I create two pacman repositories for MinGW-w64
toolchains for MSYS2:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/msys2/files/REPOS/MINGW/i686/
https://sourceforge.net/projects/msys2/files/REPOS/MINGW/x86_64/
This toolchains
2013/11/20 Alexey Pavlov alex...@gmail.com
Hi!
I want to ANNOUNCE that I create two pacman repositories for MinGW-w64
toolchains for MSYS2:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/msys2/files/REPOS/MINGW/i686/
https://sourceforge.net/projects/msys2/files/REPOS/MINGW/x86_64/
This toolchains
2013/11/20 Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com
2013/11/20 Alexey Pavlov alex...@gmail.com
Hi!
I want to ANNOUNCE that I create two pacman repositories for MinGW-w64
toolchains for MSYS2:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/msys2/files/REPOS/MINGW/i686/
2013/11/21 Jon jon.for...@gmail.com:
If yes, anytime a pacman upgrade has newer bat files, I'd like to see the
newer bat's installed as *_shell.bat.pacnew rather than overwriting the
existing bat's.
This is important to me because I have multiple msys(2)/mingw-w64 based
toolchains on my
Many thanks to Alexey for bringing us msys2 with pacman.
Hence i'm interesting in when can we expect a yaourt, a cmake and a emacs
(better similar to the cygwin's, use msys's base subsystem and windows gui).
--
Shape the
2013/11/19 张皛闶 inter1...@gmail.com
Many thanks to Alexey for bringing us msys2 with pacman.
Hence i'm interesting in when can we expect a yaourt, a cmake and a emacs
(better similar to the cygwin's, use msys's base subsystem and windows gui).
Cygwin use X11 subsystem for GUI. I don't want to
Reasons why the following in a 32bit MSYS2's /etc/pacman.conf is an awful
idea?
[mingw]
#Server = https://sourceforge.net/projects/msys2/files/REPOS/MINGW/$arch
Server = https://sourceforge.net/projects/msys2/files/REPOS/MINGW/x86_64
I don't believe there are any MSYS2 32bit exes or DLLs
2013/11/18 Jon jon.for...@gmail.com
Reasons why the following in a 32bit MSYS2's /etc/pacman.conf is an awful
idea?
[mingw]
#Server = https://sourceforge.net/projects/msys2/files/REPOS/MINGW/$arch
Server = https://sourceforge.net/projects/msys2/files/REPOS/MINGW/x86_64
$arch specify
2013/11/18 Alexey Pavlov alex...@gmail.com
2013/11/18 Jon jon.for...@gmail.com
Reasons why the following in a 32bit MSYS2's /etc/pacman.conf is an awful
idea?
[mingw]
#Server =
https://sourceforge.net/projects/msys2/files/REPOS/MINGW/$arch
Server =
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.comwrote:
2013/11/18 Alexey Pavlov alex...@gmail.com
2013/11/18 Jon jon.for...@gmail.com
Reasons why the following in a 32bit MSYS2's /etc/pacman.conf is an
awful idea?
[mingw]
#Server =
2013/11/19 Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com
2013/11/18 Alexey Pavlov alex...@gmail.com
2013/11/18 Jon jon.for...@gmail.com
Reasons why the following in a 32bit MSYS2's /etc/pacman.conf is an
awful idea?
[mingw]
#Server =
2013/11/19 Jon jon.for...@gmail.com
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com
wrote:
2013/11/18 Alexey Pavlov alex...@gmail.com
2013/11/18 Jon jon.for...@gmail.com
Reasons why the following in a 32bit MSYS2's /etc/pacman.conf is an
awful idea?
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Alexey Pavlov alex...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/11/19 Jon jon.for...@gmail.com
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/11/18 Alexey Pavlov alex...@gmail.com
2013/11/18 Jon jon.for...@gmail.com
Reasons why
2013/11/19 Jon jon.for...@gmail.com
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Alexey Pavlov alex...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/11/19 Jon jon.for...@gmail.com
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/11/18 Alexey Pavlov alex...@gmail.com
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Alexey Pavlov alex...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/11/19 Jon jon.for...@gmail.com
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Alexey Pavlov alex...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/11/19 Jon jon.for...@gmail.com
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
17 нояб. 2013 г., в 22:06, Jon jon.for...@gmail.com написал(а):
$ pacman -Syu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
msys 75.5 KiB 337K/s 00:00
[] 100%
:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for
or comment in /etc/pacman.conf mingw repository
17 нояб. 2013 г., в 22:15, Alexpux alex...@gmail.com написал(а):
17 нояб. 2013 г., в 22:13, Jon jon.for...@gmail.com написал(а):
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Jon jon.for...@gmail.com wrote:
$ pacman -Syu
:: Synchronizing package
17 нояб. 2013 г., в 22:13, Jon jon.for...@gmail.com написал(а):
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Jon jon.for...@gmail.com wrote:
$ pacman -Syu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
msys 75.5 KiB 337K/s 00:00
[] 100%
:: Starting
You need rebase dlls. Close MSYS2 and execute autorebase.bat from msys
root directory
Will the dlls always need to be rebased after an upgrade? If not, which
specific upgrade scenarios will need a rebase?
Perhaps a comment added to autorebase.bat summarizing the scenarios that
require
2013/11/13 Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com
On Nov 12 22:52, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com
writes:
On Nov 12 13:59, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
$ du -sh /lib/git-core
13M /lib/git-core
Windows Explorer says that d:/msys32/lib/git-core uses 169
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Nov 12 22:52, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com
writes:
On Nov 12 13:59, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
$ du -sh /lib/git-core
13M /lib/git-core
Windows Explorer says that d:/msys32/lib/git-core uses 169
I'm an old cygwin user who went astray years ago and would like to confirm
my MSYS2 setup.
Here's what I'm doing to have a sandboxed style setup that isolates my
normal windows setup. For example, I don't want MSYS2's default
/etc/profile to think HOME is C:\Users\Jon. I want it to think HOME is
14 нояб. 2013 г., в 0:31, Jon jon.for...@gmail.com написал(а):
I'm an old cygwin user who went astray years ago and would like to confirm my
MSYS2 setup.
Here's what I'm doing to have a sandboxed style setup that isolates my normal
windows setup. For example, I don't want MSYS2's default
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Alexpux alex...@gmail.com wrote:
14 нояб. 2013 г., в 0:31, Jon jon.for...@gmail.com написал(а):
I'm an old cygwin user who went astray years ago and would like to confirm
my MSYS2 setup.
Here's what I'm doing to have a sandboxed style setup that isolates my
Jon@Black ~
$ cd ~
Jon@Black /home/Jon
$ pwd
/home/Jon
Sorry, the above is not correct in the default case. The correct version is:
Jon@Black ~
$ cd ~
-bash: cd: /home/Jon: No such file or directory
Jon@Black ~
$ pwd
/c/Users/Jon
My earlier experiments with HOME in msys2_shell.bat had
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Alexpux alex...@gmail.com wrote:
14 нояб. 2013 г., в 0:48, Jon jon.for...@gmail.com написал(а):
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Alexpux alex...@gmail.com wrote:
14 нояб. 2013 г., в 0:31, Jon jon.for...@gmail.com написал(а):
I'm an old cygwin user who
14 нояб. 2013 г., в 0:56, Jon jon.for...@gmail.com написал(а):
Jon@Black ~
$ cd ~
Jon@Black /home/Jon
$ pwd
/home/Jon
Sorry, the above is not correct in the default case. The correct version is:
Jon@Black ~
$ cd ~
-bash: cd: /home/Jon: No such file or directory
Jon@Black ~
I unify my windows home with my MSYS2 homes using mklink /D so that
e.g. C:\msys32\home\ray is a symlink to C:\Users\ray .. I haven't run
into any problems with this recently. msysgit didn't used to like
cloning to a folder within a symlink folder, but MSYS2 git is fine
with it.
Of course you'd
Today I want to announce that MSYS2 now has console package manager -
pacman that is ported from Arch Linux. I'm still working on porting pacman
but it work in general.
You can find general info about packman here:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/pacman
I create experimental base msys2
12 нояб. 2013 г., в 16:06, Zach Thibeau zachthib...@zachthibeau.ca написал(а):
Initial testing, failed to retrieve msys. Db from sourceforge.net : error
setting certificate verify locations
Did you restart MSYS after first start?
On Nov 12, 2013 6:58 AM, Alexey Pavlov alex...@gmail.com
Heh, sorry for the multiple replies, it is working just missed the xz
package to be installed
On Nov 12, 2013 7:08 AM, Alexpux alex...@gmail.com wrote:
12 нояб. 2013 г., в 16:06, Zach Thibeau zachthib...@zachthibeau.ca
написал(а):
Initial testing, failed to retrieve msys. Db from
I did indeed, but I found the issue so right now issue fixed, just a bad
extract is all
On Nov 12, 2013 7:08 AM, Alexpux alex...@gmail.com wrote:
12 нояб. 2013 г., в 16:06, Zach Thibeau zachthib...@zachthibeau.ca
написал(а):
Initial testing, failed to retrieve msys. Db from sourceforge.net :
2013/11/12 Zach Thibeau zachthib...@zachthibeau.ca
I assume makepkg isn't fully functional yet?
In general it working. I create all packages using it.
PKGBUILD scripts located here:
https://github.com/Alexpux/MSYS2-packages
Some peaces of it need to be rewriting that use readelf but it is
I already installed it, so its nothing really.
On Nov 12, 2013 7:24 AM, Alexpux alex...@gmail.com wrote:
12 нояб. 2013 г., в 16:18, Zach Thibeau zachthib...@zachthibeau.ca
написал(а):
Heh, sorry for the multiple replies, it is working just missed the xz
package to be installed
pacman -S
12 нояб. 2013 г., в 16:36, Óscar Fuentes o...@wanadoo.es написал(а):
Hello Alexey,
Alexey Pavlov alex...@gmail.com writes:
Today I want to announce that MSYS2 now has console package manager -
pacman that is ported from Arch Linux. I'm still working on porting pacman
but it work in
$ du -sh /lib/git-core
13M /lib/git-core
Windows Explorer says that d:/msys32/lib/git-core uses 169 MB. Obviously
`du' is wrong because that directory contains lots of executables, using
1.5 MB each.
--
November
2013/11/12 Alexey Pavlov alex...@gmail.com
Today I want to announce that MSYS2 now has console package manager -
pacman that is ported from Arch Linux. I'm still working on porting pacman
but it work in general.
You can find general info about packman here:
2013/11/12 Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com
2013/11/12 Alexey Pavlov alex...@gmail.com
Today I want to announce that MSYS2 now has console package manager -
pacman that is ported from Arch Linux. I'm still working on porting pacman
but it work in general.
You can find general info
Oh Alexey you madcap.
And in honor of Get to Know Your Inner Scot Day, let me be the first to
shout a hearty FUCK YES.
Oh hell, JonY's going to ban me...
# setup a desktop shortcut with `C:\Windows\System32\cmd.exe /e:on /v:on /k
C:\Apps\msys32\msys2_shell.bat`...yea mintty options!
...and:
Well we can use something like sf.net for now until something serious
happens and there is a greater need
On Nov 12, 2013 12:37 PM, Ray Donnelly mingw.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder if we need some Arch-linux-a-like infrastructure for this
ace-ness? Of course paying for that would be a
2013/11/12 Zach Thibeau zachthib...@zachthibeau.ca
Well we can use something like sf.net for now until something serious
happens and there is a greater need
On Nov 12, 2013 12:37 PM, Ray Donnelly mingw.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder if we need some Arch-linux-a-like infrastructure for
Why were the following packages not selected for inclusion in this version
of the BASE download?
msys autoconf 2.69-1
msys automake 1.14-1
msys libtool 2.4.2-1
--
DreamFactory - Open Source REST JSON Services for
2013/11/12 Jon jon.for...@gmail.com
Why were the following packages not selected for inclusion in this version
of the BASE download?
msys autoconf 2.69-1
msys automake 1.14-1
msys libtool 2.4.2-1
There are many candidates to BASE group but need to understand that it
increase size.
Understood.
I think a vote is a bad idea because everyone has their favorite they'd
like to see in BASE. By accommodating too many favorites and trying to
please all of us, BASE will become too large.
The beauty of pacman is that it is easy for any of use to enhance BASE to
ones specific needs.
1 - 100 of 232 matches
Mail list logo