在 2019/5/18 0:16, Jacek Caban 写道:
>
> FWIW, I agree that we shouldn't have those headers in the tree. I don't
> know if anyone already depends on that already, so I'm not sure what to
> do...
>
>
> As long as we have them in the tree, the update is fine with me.
>
Removal of things doesn't
On 5/17/19 12:42 PM, LRN wrote:
On 10.05.2019 16:28, LRN wrote:
On 10.05.2019 15:53, NightStrike wrote:
On Fri, May 10, 2019, 5:24 AM LRN wrote:
TBH, i'm starting to think that we should radically cut the GL headers
down and
only ship GL.h and GLU.h, just like MS does (and also glaux.h,
On 10.05.2019 16:28, LRN wrote:
> On 10.05.2019 15:53, NightStrike wrote:
>> On Fri, May 10, 2019, 5:24 AM LRN wrote:
>>
>>> TBH, i'm starting to think that we should radically cut the GL headers
>>> down and
>>> only ship GL.h and GLU.h, just like MS does (and also glaux.h, probably).
>>> The
>>>
On 10.05.2019 15:53, NightStrike wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2019, 5:24 AM LRN wrote:
>
>> TBH, i'm starting to think that we should radically cut the GL headers
>> down and
>> only ship GL.h and GLU.h, just like MS does (and also glaux.h, probably).
>> The
>> rest can be installed separately.
>>
>>
Why remove them?
On Fri, May 10, 2019, 5:24 AM LRN wrote:
> TBH, i'm starting to think that we should radically cut the GL headers
> down and
> only ship GL.h and GLU.h, just like MS does (and also glaux.h, probably).
> The
> rest can be installed separately.
>
> In case anyone still thinks
