Re: Mir Version 1, stable ABIs and licences

2016-10-12 Thread Daniel van Vugt
My personal view is that we should drop this discussion. We have been mindful of reducing ABI breaks for years but that gets trumped by the need to implement missing features etc. Mir code landings have been extremely active recently, with thousands of lines changing every day or so. And to m

Re: Mir Version 1, stable ABIs and licences

2016-10-12 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Alternatively, we can skip the whole "what constitutes 1.0" discussion and do the fashionable thing: just make version 0.26 into version 26. :) On 13/10/16 09:59, Daniel van Vugt wrote: My personal view is that we should drop this discussion. We have been mindful of reducing ABI breaks for ye

Re: Mir Version 1, stable ABIs and licences

2016-10-12 Thread Cemil Azizoglu
> My personal view is that we should drop this discussion. > > We have been mindful of reducing ABI breaks for years but that gets trumped > by the need to implement missing features etc. > > Mir code landings have been extremely active recently, with thousands of > lines changing every day or so.