I'm able to get sensor data from the BIOS; is there something I'm
missing to be able to get them from within OpenBSD on this system? dmesg
follows...
OpenBSD 3.7-current (GENERIC) #1: Sat Jul 30 19:44:49 CDT 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: AMD-K7(tm)
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 09:43:28AM +0200, Alexander Farber wrote:
Also, does anybody know, how to run /usr/local/libexec/auth/login_-ldap
on a command line, to see if it works at all? I try following:
blowfish# /usr/local/libexec/auth/login_-ldap afarber
blowfish# echo $?
Would a hardware el-cheapo raid-controller be of any help in a way
that the joe-user standard setup procedure will work ?
If your mobo supports booting from the controller that would
probably be the easies way, just create the array and install
onto it just as if it had been a normal
2005/8/4, John Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
/usr/libexec/auth/login_-ldap -d afarber should be more verbose.
Thank you, now I get:
blowfish# /usr/local/libexec/auth/login_-ldap -d afarber
Password:
couldn't get x-ldap-server
reject
Aug 4 10:11:43
Here is what I get on the command line
(a result: 0 Success, so I wonder why does login_-ldap fail?)
blowfish# ldapsearch -x -h 172.25.93.242 \
-b o=bonmp.XXX.com (uid=afarber)
# extended LDIF
#
# LDAPv3
# base o=bonmp.XXX.com with scope sub
# filter: (uid=afarber)
#
On 8/4/05, Z L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed OBSD3.7 on my laptop. Things that are not working are:
sound and modem (dial-up internal laptop modem) and apm.
Apart from providing the *complete* dmesg output already requested by
someone else, you will also want to check the notes on the
2005/8/4, John Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 10:47:00AM +0200, Alexander Farber wrote:
# base o=bonmp.XXX.com with scope sub
Maybe the scope? If I'm reading the code correctly the default is onelevel
(or -s one on the ldapsearch command line) but the default for
Apart from providing the *complete* dmesg output already requested by
someone else
Below is the complete dmesg output:
OpenBSD 3.7 (GENERIC) #50: Sun Mar 20 00:01:57 MST 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Mobile Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz
hi:
my content of pf.conf is
#set macros
ext_if=vr0
int_if=bge0
ext_ip=222.185.xxx.xxx
int_ip=192.168.0.1
webserver=192.168.0.2
priv_net={127.0.0.0/8,192.168.0.0/16,172.16.0.0/12,10.0.0.0/8}
scrub in all
#give NAT to the internal address
nat on $ext_if from $webserver to any -$ext_if
#ftp
Running a recent snapshot (a few days ago) ospfd seems to have a problem
with correctly joining an ospf area unless it's router-priority is 0
or higher than the current BDR. Ospfd is here connected to our ospf backbone
wich is a mix of openbsd boxes running gated, Huawei 1760's and Cisco's
running
Hi,
I've disabled AH in my sysctl.conf but it doesn't work...
No I have been trying to do with OpenVPN. After read all how-to, and
some samples the connection successfull with 2 obsd behind routers.
It's very simple to do... I can see servers, but, how can I do to
check my connections is
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 09:28:32AM -0400, Brandon Mercer wrote:
I've tried running the debug, but I
can't figure out which part of the proposal is incompatible. My config has:
when i had to setup a tunnel against a speedstream 5930 ( dsl modem/router ),
i told the speedstream to make an
Can people who are able to test SATA on any nForce board mail
me off list?
There's no /etc/mygate. That's why I suggested hardwiring the IP.
But in your case there was, so this is completely another issue.
From: Alexis de BRUYN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 6:23 PM
To: Schvberle Daniel; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: RE: openbsd 3.7
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 06:49:58PM +0800, Lars Hansson wrote:
Running a recent snapshot (a few days ago) ospfd seems to have a problem
with correctly joining an ospf area unless it's router-priority is 0
or higher than the current BDR. Ospfd is here connected to our ospf backbone
wich is a mix
Helio Santana wrote:
Hi,
I've disabled AH in my sysctl.conf but it doesn't work...
No I have been trying to do with OpenVPN. After read all how-to, and
some samples the connection successfull with 2 obsd behind routers.
It's very simple to do... I can see servers, but, how can I do to
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 13:39:57 +0159
Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you test the following diff and see if this fixes the problem.
It looks like the RFC is busted and we need to find out how to fix it
without generating more troubles.
Getting the CVS as I type and will test as soon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ya ..I could test it
Bye
Matteo
Jonathan Gray wrote:
Can people who are able to test SATA on any nForce board mail
me off list?
iD8DBQFC0lwE/TjXD9LUVswRAjQfAJ4tC4p05yvI9b1Xz4KpG0n9xTr2BwCfQxqL
4UvYnTItQViOd+OotekeeNk=
=WKFS
-END PGP
Hi all,
Implementing carp, I have 2 net4801's that seem to be synchronizing, when I do
a ifconfig -a on the secondary I see carp0 on the slave becomes Master when
the primary goes down.
The internal machines are working fine accessing the internet and all.
The pf.conf rule has the 2 rules:
pass
On Thursday, August 04, 2005 Monah Baki wrote:
However when I physiclly remove the ethernet cable from sis0
on the master, the internal machine cannot access the net anymore.
Do I need to copy the pf.conf from the master to the scondary
unit, have them both identical
Sorry about my
On Thursday, August 04, 2005 Monah Baki wrote:
However when I physiclly remove the ethernet cable from sis0
on the master, the internal machine cannot access the net anymore.
Do I need to copy the pf.conf from the master to the scondary
unit, have them both identical
arp cache on the
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 18:26:52 -0600 (MDT), Diana Eichert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just use some 50cal BMG rounds, that should be effective ammunition.
sorry, I just had to after following this thread for awhile
I think you're taking the phrase Bullet-Proof Software a bit too
literally. ;-)
JCR
Hello All,
I'm trying to build a vpn between an OpenBSD and a Linux Router. (If I
could, I would directly replace the linux box to simplify matters ;-)
but that's not possible at the moment :-(
BTW: I want to use RSA-based authentication using x509 certificates. I
have already build the CA
Hi,
yes, this howto is basically unmaintained since, uhm, several years
and I actually should remove it.
However, I have configs for interop with Openswan (don't know what's
different to Freeswan) somewhere, will dig them out tonight...
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 04:09:56PM +0200, Guido Tschakert
-Original Message-
From: Monah Baki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 8:29 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Stupid Carp question
Hi all,
Implementing carp, I have 2 net4801's that seem to be
synchronizing, when I do
a ifconfig -a on the secondary I
On Jul 27 09:31 AM, Jan Sepp wrote:
Hello,
I am creating a shell script that gathers PF statistics for my various
interfaces, as in pfctl -i if -vvsI . (Yes, I am aware of the
existence of rpfcd, but as I want to monitor only one local box and
write the output directly to console, that
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 08:28:49AM -0400, Monah Baki wrote:
Hi all,
Implementing carp, I have 2 net4801's that seem to be synchronizing, when I do
a ifconfig -a on the secondary I see carp0 on the slave becomes Master when
the primary goes down.
The internal machines are working fine
Jan Sepp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The answer was surprisingly simple. I just had to create a second pf
device, chown it and make it read-only for the new owner, and I could get
my statistics. These are the actual commands:
soekris # mknod /dev/pf2 c 73 0
soekris # chown myUser /dev/pf2
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 13:39:57 +0159
Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you test the following diff and see if this fixes the problem.
No go, still the same problem with router-priority set to 1 and now i doesnt
work with router-priority set to 0 either. Other routers shows it as
hey all,
how i can use non-prased headers in apache ?!?
i have mod_perl installed!
im using CGI written in perl.
this is my script:
(i have used a famous one)
#!/usr/local/bin/perl
$server_protocol = $ENV{'SERVER_PROTOCOL'};
$server_software = $ENV{'SERVER_SOFTWARE'};
print $server_protocol
* Ami Emanuel Bizamcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-04 17:58]:
how i can use non-prased headers in apache ?!?
maybe by reading the supplied documentation...
i have mod_perl installed!
im using CGI written in perl.
Directory /somewhere
Files something.pl
SetHandler perl-script
Hi.
I researched this on MARC, and while I did find posts relating
to it, I found no definitive answer as to how to solve the problem.
I setup two firewalls, each with in/dmz/out/sync interfaces - 4
interfaces each. preempt=1,forward=1,allow=1
I have basic failover working great, but
Is there any plan to use x86 cpus rings (0..3) to improve OpenBSD security?
On Aug 04 05:21 PM, Artur Grabowski wrote:
Jan Sepp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The answer was surprisingly simple. I just had to create a second pf
device, chown it and make it read-only for the new owner, and I could get
my statistics. These are the actual commands:
soekris # mknod
On Thursday, August 4, Ed White wrote:
Is there any plan to use x86 cpus rings (0..3) to improve OpenBSD security?
Can you enlighten me how that would improve security?
If you can show me a way that does not break the unix/posix
model of the universe, I'm all ears.
--Toby.
On 8/4/05, Ed White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any plan to use x86 cpus rings (0..3) to improve OpenBSD security?
/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/i386/machdep.c has:
#if defined(I486_CPU) || defined(I586_CPU) || defined(I686_CPU)
/*
* On a 486 or above, enable ring 0 write
Is there any plan to use x86 cpus rings (0..3) to improve OpenBSD security?
Ed,
Will you please stop asking uneducated questions like that?
On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 17:56:06 +0200, Ed White proclaimed...
Is there any plan to use x86 cpus rings (0..3) to improve OpenBSD security?
No, so go back to using Windows and leave us alone.
On 8/4/05, Scott Call [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 13:07 -0500, Tom Kegerreis wrote:
Despite everything we've been told, Eschelon went public today. ESCH
on the Nasdaq
There was an all associates call about an hour ago where they made it
pretty clear they were public.
oh snap. hi [EMAIL PROTECTED] sorry!
On 8/4/05, Karsten McMinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/4/05, Scott Call [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 13:07 -0500, Tom Kegerreis wrote:
Despite everything we've been told, Eschelon went public today. ESCH
on the Nasdaq
There was
On 8/4/05, Tom Kegerreis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Previous calls had all said it would be at the end of the year - thats what
I meant
And since I work nights, I was asleep during the surprise conference call
:-)
yea its kind of a odd feeling aint it??
remember back in the day
were
On Thursday 04 August 2005 10:56 am, Ed White wrote:
Is there any plan to use x86 cpus rings (0..3) to improve OpenBSD security?
Intel VanderPool and AMD Pacifica Virtual PC technologies will add
the equivalent of ring(-1) to the x86 architecture. This new hardware
capability will permit
Can you enlighten me how that would improve security?
I'm not saying that rings improve security. In fact I'm asking *if* there is
any plan to use them to improve security.
I think that OpenBSD (and Linux and Windows) uses ring 0 for kernel and ring 3
for userland. I was asking if they
I am setting up new firewall running OpenBSD 3.7. I am trying to
implement rules using tagging. I ran into trouble with the following
line:
nat on $ext_if tagged LAN_INET tag LAN_INET_NAT - ($ext_if)
I get the following error:
/etc/pf.conf:16: syntax error
I am starting with a sample rule
However, I think that the uneducated answer by Theo means no.
No, what I mean is that asking a stupid question, which shows you did
NO WORK AT ALL TO LEARN ABOUT THIS, just makes you look like some
low-grade slashdot dumbfuck.
You heard about rings somewhere. Whooptie doo. You didn't even
Matt Provost wrote:
On Aug 04 05:21 PM, Artur Grabowski wrote:
Jan Sepp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The answer was surprisingly simple. I just had to create a second pf
device, chown it and make it read-only for the new owner, and I could get
my statistics. These are the actual
Ed,
Ever read anything about MIT's Multics and the GE 645?
Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
I'm able to get sensor data from the BIOS; is there something I'm
missing to be able to get them from within OpenBSD on this system? dmesg
follows...
Give xmbmon a try.
Rickard.
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Roland Penner wrote:
I am setting up new firewall running OpenBSD 3.7. I am trying to
implement rules using tagging. I ran into trouble with the following
line:
nat on $ext_if tagged LAN_INET tag LAN_INET_NAT - ($ext_if)
I get the following error:
/etc/pf.conf:16: syntax
Anyone on this list can help ?!?
On 8/4/05, Ami Emanuel Bizamcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have tryed what you said but i get nothing...
i just waits for the loop to finish then sends the data.
i also checked the output directly
echo GET /cgi-bin/somefile.pl | nc 127.0.0.1 80
but no
I've been trying to figure this out for a while now. I've consulted
the man pages for ath, ifconfig, and dhclient. I've checked the
mailing lists, and done many searches, even looking at Free and NetBSD
examples... but I am stumped.
I bought for my Dell Inspiron 5150 laptop a DWL-650. Hardware
I remember asking how to stop syslogd opening udp port 514 a while ago
and never doing anything about it, here goes again...
hopefully a relevant part of /etc/rc
echo 'starting system logger'
rm -f /dev/log
if [ X${named_flags} != XNO ]; then
rm -f /var/named/dev/log
Unless I am very much mistaken, this is Unix not Multics.
To do anything with the rings, you must make userland
into a three-ring circus.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Dave Feustel
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 4:05 PM
To: Theo de Raadt
The port is also used to (potentially) send data out to other syslog
servers. Therefore, it is left open. This is made ASTOUNDINGLY
clear in the manual page, if you would read it:
syslogd opens the above described socket whether or not it is running in
secure mode. If syslogd is
On Thursday, August 4, poncenby wrote:
I remember asking how to stop syslogd opening udp port 514 a while ago
and never doing anything about it, here goes again...
And people asked you to search the archives.
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address(state)
udp
On 8/4/05, poncenby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember asking how to stop syslogd opening udp port 514 a while ago
and never doing anything about it, here goes again...
Sure, syslogd opens UDP/514, but unless you use the '-u' flag the very
next thing it does is call shutdown(), which prevents
Hey folks,
i have written a piece of code i would like to test with openbsd on
soekris hardware. My work is a replacement for DJB CDB with a the nice
BSD license.
I wonder if some in this list could provide me such environment in the
following sense:
0) grant me a shell access for doing my
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 15:29 +0200, Massimo wrote:
I've made up a test LAN built on two mini-ITX Via C3 based board to test
the AES encryption functionality of this CPU on a real setup.
I've used flashboot 0.7.2 from Damien simply for a matter of time (I've
some flash card already configured)
On Thursday 04 August 2005 04:47 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless I am very much mistaken, this is Unix not Multics.
To do anything with the rings, you must make userland
into a three-ring circus.
That is precisely the point. The C programming language and Unix are
incompatible with the
if it's in userland you don't need to do anything
special for it to run on soekris hardware i386 is i386 is
i386. Have you run your stuff on OpenBSD i386?
-Bob
* Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-04 16:31]:
Hey folks,
i have written a piece of code i would like to
Yeah!
On 8/4/05, Bob Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if it's in userland you don't need to do anything
special for it to run on soekris hardware i386 is i386 is
i386. Have you run your stuff on OpenBSD i386?
-Bob
* Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-04 16:31]:
Hello, I have been reading this thread as of some interest that I have read
some stuff on rings.
Are you able to elaborate on C programming and Unix incompatible with x86.
Does this mean that other architectures such as Alpha, SGI and Sparc more
compatible?
Thank you,
rogern
From: Dave
Rings and segments are pretty much orthogonal concepts.
C is hardly unique in not supporting segmentation.
The only languages I am aware of that even come close are Burroughs
Algol and PL/I (and as always Basic Assembly). (Lisp?)
But overriding is the fact that x86 supporting segments does not
Hello everybody,
I wanna request a little change in the installer.
If I install OpenBSD on SMP-Computers I select bsd.mp during the install.
I noticed that bsd.mp will not be renamed to bsd if I don't select any other
Kernels during the setup.
Is it possible to provide a renaming in the
On 8/4/05, Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to set a obsd and soekris boxes as a server for about 100 users.
This box is supposed to handle NIS + Kerberos.
Does such configuration can handle the task ? I mean on a performance matter.
Does anybody have such configuration?
On 8/4/05, Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I asked to see how the box would behave in terms of performance.
go grab the oldest PC you can find and you'll probably have roughly
equivalent CPU and RAM performance. I hope you're not considering disk
I/O as part of performance, because Soekris
On 8/5/05, Scott Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/4/05, Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to set a obsd and soekris boxes as a server for about 100
users.
This box is supposed to handle NIS + Kerberos.
Does such configuration can handle the task ? I mean on a
You're also likely to get more useful responses if you include _any_
details about what your software does, what it's written in, or even a
URL to the source (if you really want useful comments).
Here you have it: http://www.cyberspace.org/~grios/project.html
Since, i would really appreciate
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 15:50:58 -0600, Theo de Raadt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The port is also used to (potentially) send data out to other syslog
servers. Therefore, it is left open. This is made ASTOUNDINGLY
clear in the manual page, if you would read it:
syslogd opens the above described
69 matches
Mail list logo
