On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 08:53:00AM +0100, Ramiro Aceves wrote:
Hello.
yo!
The system does not recognize my TV CARD tuner type out of the box, and
xawtv does not work. As I did not know if it was possible to configure
TV CARD with config(8), I tried to compile a kernel, so I started to
it
On 6 dec 2005, at 06.14, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
OpenBSD requires that gateway A and gateway B have a default route
declared
*EVEN THOUGH ONE IS NOT REQUIRED IN THE LAB CONFIGURATION*
...
So why in the world would a default gateway be required? A default
gateway is only required to
Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 08:53:00AM +0100, Ramiro Aceves wrote:
Hello.
yo!
The system does not recognize my TV CARD tuner type out of the box, and
xawtv does not work. As I did not know if it was possible to configure
TV CARD with config(8), I tried to compile a
Hi all
it's fixed.
i'd installed gmake and thats was the problem.
after removing gmake it works.
thanks.
Thomas
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Tom Cosgrove wrote:
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thomas_B=F6rnert?= 6-Dec-05 08:08
you wrote due to lack of details
what details do you need ?
At the very
--On 06 December 2005 12:25 +0200, Mihai Tanasescu wrote:
I don't know if this is the right list to ask so if I've posted to
the wrong one please correct me.
misc@ is better.
I need your opinion on which cards to use to best support interrupt
mitigation / coalescing on an intel xeon 3 Ghz
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:14:20AM -0500, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
OpenBSD requires that gateway A and gateway B have a default route
declared
no, you just need a route to the destination, this is a known
but and there's no simple fix. however, just create a network
route for the peer
no, you just need a route to the destination, this is a known
a route to the destination of the tunnel...(that overlaps with the encap
route...)...
but and there's no simple fix. however, just create a network
route for the peer that points back to the sender. this way
...or a route to the
I have pasted my dmesg output at: http://pastebin.com/450862
I'm quite amazed that I have 50% of the processor busy with interrupts
with only 40.000 pkt/sec traffic between the fxp and em cards.
Should I expect the same result with the sk cards ?
Stuart Henderson wrote:
--On 06 December
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:34:34AM -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
adding CARD_ in front of all the names will mess up the nice
formatting ;)
but, yes, this should be clarified.
what are you saying? CARD_ is necessary or not?
jmc
Hello misc,
I was curious about something. Is it considered as a sensible thing to
do, to request hardware info in name of the OpenBSD community directly
from vendors, for your own experimentation purposes?
My question comes from the idea that a fun way to learn device driver
programming
--On 06 December 2005 15:04 +0200, Mihai Tanasescu wrote:
I'm quite amazed that I have 50% of the processor busy with
interrupts with only 40.000 pkt/sec traffic between the fxp and em
cards.
From your dmesg:
em0 at pci2 dev 1 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT (82545GM) rev 0x04: irq
3,
* Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-12-06 15:28]:
Should I expect the same result with the sk cards ?
I don't know, I expect a bit better, but broadly similar..
no, they have the potential to perform _way_ better.
and int sharing is a good thing, at least with the UP kernels. putting
Hi,
I'm testing stability of 'Intel Server Platform SR1325TP1-E' with
OpenBSD 3.8 and after ~2 hours it end with panic. I'm attaching dmesg
from ddb. This is second time when it panic()s, but first time I had no
serial console configured. stress(1) was started like this:
$ stress -c 32
pedro@ committed a patch which should fix this:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c.diff?r1=1.77r2=1.78
It is in the stable branch. Try your test again with 3.8-stable.
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, q# wrote:
Hi,
I'm testing stability of 'Intel Server Platform SR1325TP1-E'
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 10:11:51AM -0500, Aaron Campbell wrote:
pedro@ committed a patch which should fix this:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c.diff?r1=1.77r2=1.78
It is in the stable branch. Try your test again with 3.8-stable.
Ok, I will start test with
http://www.osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=12886
for those developers who know how to write drivers...
Thank you for the advices I've got.
I'm going to try an mp kernel tonight and see the results.
As for sk chipset based netcards(single/dual port), do you have any
recomandations ?
I've heard the D-Link ones perform quite well.
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 08:46:55PM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
Heck, in general I agree with you. Any such effort would start off as a
sad hack, it would be a lot of work and in the end, there might be
nothing gained in the way of fixes since Oracle will probably just
ignore your bug reports. I
In light of recent discussions about how to implement device
mirroring, it might be useful to describe an approach used
in Bull's GCOS8 operating system. (GCOS8 is a mainframe
operating system designed for the highest possible
reliability and dynamic replacement of parts.) The GCOS8
approach
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:28:27PM +0100, Paulo Rodriguez wrote:
Hello misc,
I was curious about something. Is it considered as a sensible thing to
do, to request hardware info in name of the OpenBSD community directly
from vendors, for your own experimentation purposes?
If it is for
Since I upgraded an OpenBSD/amd64 3.7 to 3.8 (following instructions in
the Upgrade Guide) sometimes gethostbyname() returns NULL with h_errno
equal to -1 (Resolver internal error).
The program (OpenSER 1.0.0) had no problems under 3.7.
The domain string is correct.
The error seems to appear
Peter Fraser wrote:
In light of recent discussions about how to implement device
mirroring, it might be useful to describe an approach used
in Bull's GCOS8 operating system. (GCOS8 is a mainframe
operating system designed for the highest possible
reliability and dynamic replacement of parts.)
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:28:27PM +0100, Paulo Rodriguez wrote:
Hello misc,
I was curious about something. Is it considered as a sensible thing to
do, to request hardware info in name of the OpenBSD community directly
from vendors, for your own experimentation purposes?
If it is
--On 06 December 2005 15:38 +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-12-06 15:28]:
Should I expect the same result with the sk cards ?
I don't know, I expect a bit better, but broadly similar..
no, they have the potential to perform _way_ better.
and int
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Federico Giannici wrote:
Since I upgraded an OpenBSD/amd64 3.7 to 3.8 (following instructions in the
Upgrade Guide) sometimes gethostbyname() returns NULL with h_errno equal to
-1 (Resolver internal error).
What is the value of errno?
The program (OpenSER 1.0.0) had no
* Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-12-06 20:40]:
--On 06 December 2005 15:38 +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-12-06 15:28]:
Should I expect the same result with the sk cards ?
I don't know, I expect a bit better, but broadly similar..
no,
I just want to make sure that virtual links are not yet supported in
ospfd. I don't see anything in the ospfd.conf(5) or ospfd(8) so I
assume not, but I did see that Claudio mentioned[1] testing it at the
hackathon, so it may well be that I just don't understand the man page.
I do have to say
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Le virement, c'est brillant avec AcchsD!
==
Concours Le virement, c'est brillant avec AcchsD!
gagner : une Smart 2006 (valeur approximative de 20 000 $) plus
l'assurance auto gratuite de Desjardins Assurances
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:38:07 -0800, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted happens to be one of the guys responsible for writing OpenBSD, so
you'd probably be much better off *asking* Ted why OpenBSD is written
and what its uses are.
then why is he asking for support? im not saying ted
can images be mounted over themselves ? :x
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 17:24:01 +, Lums Bruno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander Farber wrote:
I have one suggestion: if a user logs in and the path to home dir
in the /etc/passwd is actually pointing to a file, then it is
encrypted
Ok, maybe not
On 12/6/05, Zachery Hostens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can images be mounted over themselves ? :x
yes
Si ce message ne s'affiche pas correctement, cliquer ici.
[IMAGE]
GRAND JEU GRATUIT
Sous contrtle d'huissier.
Tout le monde gagne, sans engagement.
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
1er prix :
5.000 â¬
2hme prix :
3.000 â¬
3hme prix :
3.000 â¬
Et des centaines d'autres bons d'achat de 50
On 12/6/05, Zachery Hostens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:38:07 -0800, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted happens to be one of the guys responsible for writing OpenBSD, so
you'd probably be much better off *asking* Ted why OpenBSD is written
and what its uses are.
Hi!
Lately, I've been adding two new subnets to my internal LAN here, and
from time to time I have had to run `arp -ad' to delete arp entries. (Or
at least I have thought it would be userful.)
However, every now and then after running that specific command, the
computer has stopped
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 01:19:32PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:34:34AM -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
adding CARD_ in front of all the names will mess up the nice
formatting ;)
but, yes, this should be clarified.
what are you saying? CARD_ is necessary or
On 12/6/05, Zachery Hostens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
then why is he asking for support? im not saying ted isnt an openbsd
developer. it just seems odd he is asking for aid in getting software to run
on it.
i wasn't. i didn't think the original message was very helpful
though. the use of
Theo de Raadt wrote:
...
Nick is not speaking for the project when he says these things.
Nick was barely speaking for himself.
My appologies to the OP, as somehow I thought he was trying to get
HARDWARE from vendors in the OpenBSD name for own fun. I managed to
miss the word info repeatedly.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was hoping someone could shed some light with some good
links, sample configurations, etc., that might help me
with the following. Not looking for someone to fix it
for me or anything like that. Maybe the following will show
that I have tried
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 10:40:31 -0500 (EST), Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
All:
It may seem rudimentary, but no where in the FAQ or man pages is it
explicitly stated that the source address or address pool of a NAT
translation must be assigned to an interface.
Obviously it can be either be a primary
On 12/5/05, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 21:57:15 -0700, Josh Tolley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OpenBSD is written for uses
where freedom, stability, adherence to standards, and security are the
top concerns
You are pontificating your personal opinions on why
40 matches
Mail list logo
