I assume the artwork as something to do with wavelan is a battlefield[1] :-)
/me supplementing OpenBSD/macppc 'mini with similarly SFF[2] OpenBSD/x86.
1] my favorite /etc diff of the 3.9 snapshot.
2] system76.com's Koala Mini.
Theo de Raadt wrote:
We have activated the pre-orders for OpenBSD 3.9...
More information can be found at
http://www.openbsd.org/39.html
There's a T-shirt and a poster too...
(The whole subject of the artwork will become more clear in a while,
as we make more of it available
I got it in my mind that I would use OpenBSD as my development system to do
L$ (Microkernel ) work.
But I'm having a problem with the binutils tools. Fisrst I needed the GNU
nm utility (because the SCons environment executes an nm --radix=d varient
). Now I'm having problems with the linker. I
On 2006/03/07 23:08, Chris Zakelj wrote:
Aye. You're flushing rules and NAT, but not your state table. Since
the state is already established, rules aren't re-evaluated. Adding a
state flush ought to get AOL wiped out. Just be mindful that if you
have something going on (like an SSH
We are pleased to invite you to review our business to business web site. Our
home page is: http://www.consultantsunited.com
Our site is designed to help people find and get in touch with Experts,
Business Opportunities, Jobs, Articles, Events, News and Press Releases.
Membership to access our
Felix Kronlage wrote:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 02:19:51AM -0600, Julian Fondren wrote:
I assume the artwork as something to do with wavelan is a battlefield[1] :-)
binary blobs do not only affect wireless, since nfe(4) is another
case where one could use a binary blob from the vendor and
On Tuesday 07 March 2006 23:42, Peter wrote:
Hi. I've set up several firewalls with OpenBSD but I have yet to go to
any extremes regarding hardening. So far I have updated the source
(stable), recompiled the system kernel, removed the source code,
turned off inetd, and set up a tight
Lars Hansson wrote:
On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:59:43 -0800
smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any plans for an OpenBSD implementation of sshfs?
Or has someone successfully installed fuse and sshfs on OpenBSD
(preferably 3.8)?
IIRC, fuse is pretty tied to the Linux kernel so porting it
Hi,
I recently picked up some Soekris gear for work. One part was a vpn1401
crypto accelerator. OpenBSD 3.8 fresh from the CD sees the card OK but
won't use it. Quick script to turn userland crypto off and on with
benchmarks proves that.
I thought it may be a machine-dependant problem (it's for
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 08:23:17PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
We have activated the pre-orders for OpenBSD 3.9...
W HO!!!
It pays to order early! You stupid, cheap fuckers!
Gord
Running 12V fans at 7V often works nicely (easily achieved with PC
hardware by connecting the fan to 5V and 12V rather than 0V and 12V).
With my electronics-designer cap on, I'd advise a little caution with this.
The 5V regulator is designed to source, not sink, current. If the fan
current
smith wrote:
Are there any plans for an OpenBSD implementation of sshfs?
Or has someone successfully installed fuse and sshfs on OpenBSD
(preferably 3.8)?
Yea, that would be very useful.
Sadly, I have neither the skills nor the finances to fund someone
possesing them. But I'll offer up
Theo de Raadt a icrit :
The idea is that you shouldn't need to change any options.
Well then it will be easier than I thought :-)
I read some old threads about too small tcp.sendspace / tcp.recvspace in
3.4 time that used to hit performance so I thought it would be useful.
The others
yary wrote:
On 3/7/06, Chris 'Xenon' Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yary wrote:
Pardon me for giving what may be a naive answer, but how about putting
/usr/local/lib into the LD_LIBRARY_PATH env variable before starting
the wanrouter script?
It's an obvious answer, but I figured there
On 2006/03/08 16:37, Marcel Prisi wrote:
OpenBGPD's config seems OK, but I need some help about OpenBSD's tunable
parameters using sysctl.
net.inet.tcp.recvspace=65536
net.inet.tcp.sendspace=65536
kern.ipc.somaxconn=1024
net.inet.icmp.drop_redirect=1
net.inet.icmp.log_redirect=1
Try flushing the state table too.
-Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jim
Sent: 08 March 2006 03:00
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Why packets are not blocked
When my kid gets grounded I block the gameroom computer from getting to the
I am in the process of setting up an OpenBSD / OpenBGPD core router for
a small local ISP (two 20mbps upstreams, simple setup).
OpenBGPD's config seems OK, but I need some help about OpenBSD's tunable
parameters using sysctl.
The idea is that you shouldn't need to change any options.
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 11:08:51PM -0500, Chris Zakelj wrote:
Steven wrote:
* Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060307 20:36]:
The problem is that if the kid is already logged into AOL Instant
messenger, the connection is not broken. So even though she is
grounded, she can still chat all day on
* Marcel Prisi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-08 16:42]:
OpenBGPD's config seems OK, but I need some help about OpenBSD's tunable
parameters using sysctl.
the only thing you might want to change is
net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen
the default is a little low for routing at higher speeds. 250 seems
a good
Dear Jonathan:
Thank you very much for your recent inquiry about job openings
in the Brighton Area!
We have new job openings in your area and would like to know
if you are still available.
If so, please let us know by clicking on the following link, or copy/paste
the link into your web
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Marcel Prisi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-08 16:42]:
OpenBGPD's config seems OK, but I need some help about OpenBSD's tunable
parameters using sysctl.
the only thing you might want to change is
net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen
the default is a little low for routing at higher
On 3/7/06, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When my kid gets grounded I block the gameroom computer from getting to the
internet. The script that runs is
#!/bin/sh -
cp /home/jmays/pf.conf.noGameroom /etc/pf.conf
pfctl -F rules -f /etc/pf.conf
pfctl -F nat -f /etc/pf.conf
The script should
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 11:42:23PM -0500, Peter wrote:
Hi. I've set up several firewalls with OpenBSD but I have yet to go to
any extremes regarding hardening. So far I have updated the source
(stable), recompiled the system kernel, removed the source code,
turned off inetd, and set up a
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 12:42:27AM -0800, Subcommander l0r3zz wrote:
I got it in my mind that I would use OpenBSD as my development system to do
L$ (Microkernel ) work.
But I'm having a problem with the binutils tools. Fisrst I needed the GNU
nm utility (because the SCons environment executes
Hey folks,
i have just installed 3.8 in my sun desktop. It installed ok, 100% perfect.
Know, i would like to strip the kernel to the bare minimum and get X
working. have anybody in the list already configured the kernel and
recompiled it? Could you send the two configuration files in order to
me
My Intel network card, which works under 3.8, is not detected in the
March 2 snapshot (I tried some previous snapshots as well, same issue).
Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated!
Dan Hamlin
OpenBSD 3.8 (GENERIC) #138: Sat Sep 10 15:41:37 MDT 2005
[EMAIL
* Will H. Backman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-08 19:17]:
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Marcel Prisi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-08 16:42]:
OpenBGPD's config seems OK, but I need some help about OpenBSD's tunable
parameters using sysctl.
the only thing you might want to change is
My Intel network card, which works under 3.8, is not detected in the
March 2 snapshot (I tried some previous snapshots as well, same issue).
Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated!
Looks like a fuck-up on our side for 3.9. Can you try the following diff
and report whether your
* Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-08 12:13]:
1. Use sudo exclusively - set an empty or nonsense root password
Stupid - if there is only one user with sudo-ability then
this is the same as just having root. if there are more, there are
now two passwords out there to get
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote:
Thanks everyone!
Leaves me wondering why you cannot use ksh to run the script. Are you
running into a ksh bug or a bash specific feature?
-Otto
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote:
Thanks everyone!
Leaves me wondering why you cannot use ksh to run the script. Are you
running into a ksh bug or a bash specific feature?
I honestly don't know, I didn't write the script, Sangoma did. It calls for bash,
Marcel Prisi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read some old threads about too small tcp.sendspace / tcp.recvspace in
3.4 time that used to hit performance so I thought it would be useful.
These settings only affect TCP sessions that connect directly to that system.
In other words, they don't do
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote:
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote:
Thanks everyone!
Leaves me wondering why you cannot use ksh to run the script. Are you
running into a ksh bug or a bash specific feature?
I honestly don't know, I
monitoring the congestion counter in pfctl -si helps a lot.
you don't want too long queues tho, that is contraproductive.
What are the consequences of ifq set too large?
--Matt
Gustavo Rios wrote:
Know, i would like to strip the kernel to the bare minimum and get X
working. have anybody in the list already configured the kernel and
recompiled it?
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Why
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 15:05:35 -, Andrew Smith wrote:
Rod, you didn't mention the architecture... for now I'll assume i386.
You also didn't mention if it was an upgrade over a 3.8 or a clean 3.9
install. I'll assume a 3.9 clean install.
Double check that you have machdep.allowaperture=2 in
-Original Message-
From: Miod Vallat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 3:45 PM
To: Hamlin, Daniel N
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Problem detecting fxp in March 2 snapshot
My Intel network card, which works under 3.8, is not detected in the
March 2
I would like to remind our community that our project lives and
breathes because of the sale of CDs and the receipt of donations. In
the last few years a few very large donations have allowed our
hackathons to happen, but other than that we are always digging
ourself a bigger and bigger hole.
On 3/8/06, Matt Rowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
monitoring the congestion counter in pfctl -si helps a lot.
you don't want too long queues tho, that is contraproductive.
What are the consequences of ifq set too large?
packets go in the queue and don't come out.
On 03/08/06 23:33, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Peter Valchev dixit:
lg - log
No, the original is correct. lg means log base 2.
Isn't that lb?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logarithm
ld
?
+++chefren
On 3/7/06, Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You prompted me to go back and take another shot at X on a Optiplex 620.
I've (again) had no luck getting it to work with the standard,
on-board video. What did you do to configure X on it? (I didn't see an
extra video card in your dmesg).
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 01:58:18PM -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
* Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-08 12:13]:
1. Use sudo exclusively - set an empty or nonsense root password
Stupid ...
2. Use public key authentication only for sshd(8), and restrict
which users can
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 06:07:30PM -0500, jared r r spiegel wrote:
including the commandlines of said benchmarks would have been hot,
in this case.
i'm inclined to ask how you determined the benchmarks prove that
it isn't used ( watching 'systat vmstat', time(1)'ing them, etc ),
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote:
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote:
Thanks everyone!
Leaves me wondering why you cannot use ksh to run the script. Are you
running into a ksh bug or a bash specific feature?
I honestly
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 06:29:47PM -0600, Gordon Grieder wrote:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 06:07:30PM -0500, jared r r spiegel wrote:
including the commandlines of said benchmarks would have been hot,
in this case.
The speed with and without userland crypto enabled was the same for
Steve Fairhead wrote:
... snip...
Summary: with small fans, it should work, but you've introduced a mechanism
whereby a fan failure could destroy the machine.
Aha, I just knew there was more to my attraction to the zalman fan mate
than my instinctive aversion to electricity since staying
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 07:59:02PM -0500, jared r r spiegel wrote:
only thing i guess i can offer is:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=108215148805896w=2
and to say that i've used a 1401 on a desktop and 1411s in soekris
4801s without issue(*) from 3.7 on up to the
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 07:59:02PM -0500, jared r r spiegel wrote:
only thing i guess i can offer is:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=108215148805896w=2
and to say that i've used a 1401 on a desktop and 1411s in soekris
4801s without issue(*) from 3.7 on up to
Gustavo Rios wrote:
Hey folks,
i have just installed 3.8 in my sun desktop. It installed ok, 100% perfect.
Know, i would like to strip the kernel to the bare minimum and get X
It sounds like you come from Linux, where kernels are bloated. OpenBSD
is not like Linux. The OpenBSD kernel is not
Thanks to all who helped solve this problem. It has been very educational
for me. I knew I could find the answer here... as always.
Jim
If I were her, and I saw these rules, I would just change my IP with
ifconfig :D
two problems here.
1. she is not smart enough
2. dhcpd is configured to look at her mac address and always assign this ip.
cheers.
Jim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For your information, the bsdportal which used to be at
metawire.org/~liamfoy/bsdportal
has changed to more reliable hosting at:
liamjfoy.freeshell.org
Update your bookmarks! Thanks!
Thanks. So it seems I'm not the only one have problems accessing
Hey Jim,
Quoting Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If I were her, and I saw these rules, I would just change my IP with
ifconfig :D
two problems here.
1. she is not smart enough
I hope you mean, she is not knowledgeable enough.
Shane
On 2/2/06, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/2/06, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you could start here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-techm=108663340015236w=2
i suppose the link would be more useful if you could get the code. if
somebody is seriously interested (as
* Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-08 23:28]:
On 3/8/06, Matt Rowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
monitoring the congestion counter in pfctl -si helps a lot.
you don't want too long queues tho, that is contraproductive.
What are the consequences of ifq set too large?
packets go in the
55 matches
Mail list logo
