On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:07:37PM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
/dev/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ADPT,[EMAIL PROTECTED]:9,ofwboot, which makes sense
from the
try /dev/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ADPT,[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0,ofwboot
Hello all
Has anyone got experience with Lenovo notebooks running OpenBSD.
If you are so kind to share your experience.
tnx.
If I run zzz from an xterm and resume the mouse is frozen. If I
switch to another terminal or if I ssh into my laptop, run zzz,
resume, and switch back to X, then the mouse works fine.
OpenBSD 4.0-current (GENERIC) #1145: Tue Oct 10 15:58:33 MDT 2006
[EMAIL
I don't know what I'm supposed to make of this:
=== Start Message ===
Subject: my host name daily insecurity output
Checking special files and directories.
Output format is:
filename:
criteria (shouldbe, reallyis)
.: permissions (0755, 0777)
=== End Message ===
Most likely some time tomorrow I'll have a Thinkpad R60 with an Intel
Core Duo processor land in my lap. I wonder, would it be at all
useful to try running it with a bsd.mp kernel?
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/
On 26/10/06, martin g [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all
Has anyone got experience with Lenovo notebooks running OpenBSD.
If you are so kind to share your experience.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscs=lenovo
--
Andreas Kahari
Somewhere in the general Cambridge area, UK
We seem to have hit a bug in OpenBGPD regarding tcpmd5.
We are running OpenBGPD 3.9 on OpenBSD 3.9 on i386 with two full peers.
We had a running session with tcpmd5 working.
For some reason, we had to change its password.
I edited bgpd.conf, bgpctl reload, bgpctl neighbor clear
But the
On 10/26/06, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/10/06, martin g [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all
Has anyone got experience with Lenovo notebooks running OpenBSD.
If you are so kind to share your experience.
I have a Thinkpad T43 running an OpenBSD snapshot at the moment.
* Marcel Prisi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-26 11:34]:
We seem to have hit a bug in OpenBGPD regarding tcpmd5.
We are running OpenBGPD 3.9 on OpenBSD 3.9 on i386 with two full peers.
We had a running session with tcpmd5 working.
For some reason, we had to change its password.
I edited
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:32:00AM -0700, John Draper wrote:
Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 03:17:05PM -0700, John Draper wrote:
or would I (...) write [Snort-inline] off as something OpenBSD is
not setup to do, or is there an alternative [to IPTables] I can
use with
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 05:54:37PM -0500, Damian Wiest wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 03:06:36PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
Just a half-baked thought, but escaping any non-constant expression
(i.e., actual variable, not fixed string) passed to the browser or a
database would go a long
Hi all,
I came across this curiosity, it looks like the firewall was running
~4 minutes before the computer booted. Wouldn't be a bad idea I guess.
I have checked 3.8 and 3.9 and such difference is not there, although
those machines have only weeks of uptime.
[11:15:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
Hello,
I new to bgp and I try to use it but i have some trouble with carp devices
I Have 2 peering, one work great one not
My interfaces :
carp0 = interface with interroute : 212.xxx.xxx.254
carp0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
carp: MASTER carpdev em0 vhid
* ClaudeBrassel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-26 12:44]:
carp0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
carp: MASTER carpdev em0 vhid 1 advbase 1 advskew 100
groups: carp
inet 212.xxx.xxx.254 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 212.xxx.xxx.255
* Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-26 12:59]:
* ClaudeBrassel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-26 12:44]:
carp0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
carp: MASTER carpdev em0 vhid 1 advbase 1 advskew 100
groups: carp
inet 212.xxx.xxx.254
On 26/10/06, Patrick Rutkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know what I'm supposed to make of this:
=== Start Message ===
Subject: my host name daily insecurity output
Checking special files and directories.
Output format is:
filename:
criteria (shouldbe, reallyis)
RCF wrote:
[11:16:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uptime
11:16AM up 440 days, 22:15, 1 user, load averages: 0.39, 0.26, 0.19
[11:16:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo pfctl -s info
Status: Enabled for 440 days 22:20:03 Debug: Urgent
I guess your time was off by a few minutes when you started your
The server had been in testing for almost a month with rdate
configured to run every 6 hours before I rebooted. So I don't really
think the clock was off.
On 26/10/06, Alexander Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RCF wrote:
[11:16:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uptime
11:16AM up 440 days, 22:15, 1 user,
Hello,
The release is :
bgp1 # uname -rsv
OpenBSD 3.9 GENERIC#617
and yes 212.x.x.253 is my neigbhor.
bgp1 # ifconfig carp0
carp0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
carp: BACKUP carpdev em0 vhid 1 advbase 1 advskew 100
groups: carp
inet
- Original Message -
From: martin g
Date: Thursday, October 26, 2006 9:10
Subject: Lenovo notebooks
To: misc@openbsd.org
Hello all
Has anyone got experience with Lenovo notebooks running OpenBSD.
If you are so kind to share your experience.
tnx.
Hello,
I'm using a thinkpad x60s.
Some add-on :
in the /var/log/daemon I have following entrys if I start the bgp session
with the carp :
Oct 26 13:48:12 bgp1 bgpd[31321]: nexthop 212.23.37.253 now valid: via
212.23.37.254
And this one with the em0 interface :
Oct 26 13:53:21 bgp1 bgpd[31321]: nexthop 212.23.37.253 now valid:
Some add-on :
If I start the session with the carp device I have following in the
/var/log/daemon :
Oct 26 13:48:12 bgp1 bgpd[31321]: nexthop 212.x.x.253 now valid: via
212.x.x.254
And this one with the em0 interface :
Oct 26 13:53:21 bgp1 bgpd[31321]: nexthop 212.x.x.253 now valid: directly
I found it. ugh. storing the dynamically aquired SPIs in a struct the
gets overwritten was no good idea - of course we fail to reove the old
SPIs then on reconfig.
to get your box going again, reconfig bgpd with new passwords, flush the
SAs using ipsecctl (will kill existing md5'd sessions),
ok, I am pretty certain this is fixed in 4.0
--
Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg Amsterdam
* Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-26 14:06]:
I found it. ugh. storing the dynamically aquired SPIs in a struct the
gets overwritten was no good idea - of course we fail to reove the old
SPIs then on reconfig.
let me retry this sentence in english.
Storing the dynamically acquired
* ClaudeBrassel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-26 14:03]:
Some add-on :
If I start the session with the carp device I have following in the
/var/log/daemon :
Oct 26 13:48:12 bgp1 bgpd[31321]: nexthop 212.x.x.253 now valid: via
212.x.x.254
yes, as I said, this is because the ifindex is not set
[IMAGE]
Offre riservie exclusivement aux entreprises.
Conformiment ` la Loi Informatique et Libertis parue au Journal Officiel
du 6 janvier 1978, vous disposez d'un droit d'acchs, de rectification, et
d'opposition aux donnies personnelles vous concernant. Pour ne plus
recevoir d'informations de
I admit that I am not the most up to date on the release process, but
why is 4.0 not out on the FTP server yet if people are receiving it in
their homes on CD? And how do I get on that list of people who get the
pre-release?
ICMan
martin g writes:
Hello all
Has anyone got experience with Lenovo notebooks running OpenBSD.
If you are so kind to share your experience.
I recently got my hands on a Z61T which is pretty nice. The functionality
that I require works, though it is lacking the power managament functions
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 09:16 -0400, ICMan wrote:
I admit that I am not the most up to date on the release process, but
why is 4.0 not out on the FTP server yet if people are receiving it in
It is not uploaded on the FTP until Nov, 1st, which is the official
release date.
their homes on CD?
Hi ICMan,
I admit that I am not the most up to date on the release process, but
why is 4.0 not out on the FTP server yet if people are receiving it in
their homes on CD?
4.0 is due Nov 1st. People who pre-order, get their stuff beforehand.
And how do I get on that list of people who get
* ICMan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-26 15:21]:
I admit that I am not the most up to date on the release process, but
why is 4.0 not out on the FTP server yet if people are receiving it in
their homes on CD?
because it is not released yet?
And how do I get on that list of people who get the
On Thursday 26 October 2006 08:16, you wrote:
I admit that I am not the most up to date on the release process, but
why is 4.0 not out on the FTP server yet if people are receiving it in
their homes on CD?
From https://https.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/order:
Will release and ship November 1 2006
If
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 09:16:07AM -0400, ICMan wrote:
I admit that I am not the most up to date on the release process, but
why is 4.0 not out on the FTP server yet if people are receiving it in
their homes on CD? And how do I get on that list of people who get the
pre-release?
It'll be
ICMan wrote on Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 09:16:07AM -0400:
I admit that I am not the most up to date on the release process,
but why is 4.0 not out on the FTP server yet if people are receiving
it in their homes on CD?
It is not yet released, in particular, any required errata may
not yet be
Hi ICMan,
I am new to the list and I do not fully understand the process either.
However, I believe that the project gets a large portion of its funding from
the sale of CDs. So to give added incentive to buy CDs, those who pre-order
get the release early. I think this is how it works but I
On Oct 26, 2006, at 9:16 AM, ICMan wrote:
I admit that I am not the most up to date on the release process,
but why is 4.0 not out on the FTP server yet if people are
receiving it in their homes on CD? And how do I get on that list
of people who get the pre-release?
ICMan
Pre-orders
ICMan wrote:
I admit that I am not the most up to date on the release process, but
why is 4.0 not out on the FTP server yet if people are receiving it in
their homes on CD? And how do I get on that list of people who get the
pre-release?
Folks who pre-order gets an advantage. The rest of us
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 12:44:25PM +0100, RCF wrote:
The server had been in testing for almost a month with rdate
configured to run every 6 hours before I rebooted. So I don't really
think the clock was off.
Clocks naturally drift over time. Four minutes over about 1.5 years
seems reasonable.
RCF wrote:
The server had been in testing for almost a month with rdate
configured to run every 6 hours before I rebooted. So I don't really
think the clock was off.
I don't have this issue, but if you're running rdate every six hours,
you might want to 'man ntpd' instead.
PS pre-orders do not guarantee early delivery... I'm still waiting
for mine here in ny but it's ok because my 3.9 systems are running
just fine and they can wait :)
AFAICT, you cannot update packages to 4.0 versions until November 1st since
they're not available on the FTP mirrors. if this
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 09:16:07AM -0400, ICMan wrote:
I admit that I am not the most up to date on the release process, but
why is 4.0 not out on the FTP server yet if people are receiving it in
their homes on CD? And how do I get on that list of people who get the
pre-release?
You have
2006/10/26, Dylan Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am new to the list and I do not fully understand the process either.
Then RTFAQ!
On 10/25/06, Matt Bettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I added a pause as suggested by Jason Dixon, and still cannot pick up
a lease unless I do it manually. I'm really at a loss as what can be
causing this and running out of places where I can check for the
problem. Does anyone else have any
On 10/25/06 23:16, Jon Simola wrote:
I'm really hoping someone recorded Theo's talk at the CUUG last night.
I've seen the slides from a few presentations floating around, but
audio to accompy them would be icing on the cake.
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=CUUG
Last year seems to be
On 10/26/06, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Most likely some time tomorrow I'll have a Thinkpad R60 with an Intel
Core Duo processor land in my lap. I wonder, would it be at all
useful to try running it with a bsd.mp kernel?
Unless you just want to use one of the two cores, bsd.mp would seem to
I am new to the list and I do not fully understand the process either.
However, I believe that the project gets a large portion of its funding
from the sale of CDs. So to give added incentive to buy CDs, those who
pre-order get the release early. I think this is how it works but I could
be
Lenovo has been building the ThinkPads for some 5 odd years, they just
bourght the brand from IBM.
I have the following hardware running 4.0 or earlier from the pre-order CD's.
You should really get yours too, not buying the CD's will not improve
the hardware support now will it?
Shame on
On 10/26/06, Johan P. Lindstrvm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should really get yours too, not buying the CD's will not improve
the hardware support now will it?
The way it works here is boss, I need to buy an openbsd license for each
openbsd box we run. It's $50 each, + shipping. Sign here
Hi,
If I recall correctly, slbd adds new rules to pf for each incoming
tcp session. Since I couldn't get it to work (old version) I do not
know what the session and Sources tables will look like, but I
suspect there will be no problems with them in slbd. Client-server
association is
On 10/26/06, Johan P. Lindstrvm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should really get yours too, not buying the CD's will not improve
the hardware support now will it?
The way it works here is boss, I need to buy an openbsd license for each
openbsd box we run. It's $50 each, + shipping. Sign here
Pete Vickers wrote:
1) When using sticky-address in the rdr rules client-server
associations are added to the internal Sources table.
It is impossible to remove entries for a single backend from this
table. If a backend fails and is removed from the rdr destination
table this
Hey,
On 10/26/06, Pete Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I recall correctly,
You don't. :o)
slbd adds new rules to pf for each incoming
tcp session. Since I couldn't get it to work (old version) I do not
know what the session and Sources tables will look like, but I
suspect there will be
On 26/10/06, stuartv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/26/06, Johan P. Lindstrvm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should really get yours too, not buying the CD's will not improve
the hardware support now will it?
The way it works here is boss, I need to buy an openbsd license for each
openbsd box
Hi,
Any poor soul living in Frankfurt and running Linux or Windows needing a
Soundblaster (PCI) card? I have a Soundblaster Audigy LE card to give
away as there is no BSD support for this one (checked FreeBSD project as
well).
I tried fooling around with it, putting support into it, after
Hi,
This is a sorta n00bish question, but I've just discovered that unlike
what I've always assumed to be the case, changing a file's permissions
doesn't touch its last modified time/date stamp.
Is there any way to find out when a file's permissions were last modified?
regards,
--ropers
--
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:07:49PM +0200, ropers wrote:
Hi,
This is a sorta n00bish question, but I've just discovered that unlike
what I've always assumed to be the case, changing a file's permissions
doesn't touch its last modified time/date stamp.
Is there any way to find out when a
On Oct 26, 2006, at 4:04 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Patrick Rutkowski wrote:
I don't know what I'm supposed to make of this:
=== Start Message ===
Subject: my host name daily insecurity output
Checking special files and directories.
Output format is:
filename:
On Thursday 26 October 2006 22:28, Kevin Reay wrote:
Hey,
On 10/26/06, Pete Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I recall correctly,
You don't. :o)
slbd adds new rules to pf for each incoming
tcp session. Since I couldn't get it to work (old version) I do not
know what the session and
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:07:49PM +0200, ropers wrote:
| Hi,
|
| This is a sorta n00bish question, but I've just discovered that unlike
| what I've always assumed to be the case, changing a file's permissions
| doesn't touch its last modified time/date stamp.
|
| Is there any way to find out when
On 26/10/06, Paul de Weerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:07:49PM +0200, ropers wrote:
| Hi,
|
| This is a sorta n00bish question, but I've just discovered that unlike
| what I've always assumed to be the case, changing a file's permissions
| doesn't touch its last modified
Hi Per-Olav,
If you are dealing with http based services, rather than generic tcp,
then you could take a look at 'pound'. I did a port of it a while
back, and use it in pretty large scale environment here, it supports
sticky backend etc. Works well for me, YMMV.
Hi all,
I've been unable to successfully install mysql-python.
Here are the details:
##
# versions:
##
OpenBSD 3.9 stable
Python 2.5
MySQL 3.23.58
MySQL-python-1.2.1_p2
##
# build results:
##
% python setup.py build
running build
running build_py
creating
Joachim Schipper wrote:
I also posted this to the snort users list, [EMAIL PROTECTED], but
(sigh) my postings are not making it to the list. Have they changed
their list mailing address? I suppose I shouldn't ask that in this
forum, but if anyone knows the snort mailing list address,
Hi,
On Thursday, 26. October 2006 23:07, ropers wrote:
Hi,
This is a sorta n00bish question, but I've just discovered that unlike
what I've always assumed to be the case, changing a file's permissions
doesn't touch its last modified time/date stamp.
Is there any way to find out when a
Some people like to run antivirus software on UNIX boxes to ensure
they're not carriers for Windows viruses, etc. Personally, I
think it should be the responsibility of the Windows users to secure
their own machines rather than relying on the kindness of others.
-Damian
I second that.
I had the same problem! I've not tried it much but i have almost the
same configuration. I couldn't find much information about setting ipip
on the new ipsec.conf either.
Alejandro.
Martmn Coco wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build IP-IP flows with the new ipsecctl tool. I have two
OpenBSD 4.0
First, read through the compat_freebsd (8) man page.
Some points to note:
-The 'ldd' command being run in your excerpts is most likely the
OpenBSD /usr/bin/ldd, which is not going to work properly with
binaries compiled for other OSes. You need a FreeBSD 'ldd' binary;
preferably as
My GF just called and it has arrived, 2 CD sets, an audio CD, and
another wireframe tshirt.
Can't wait to see the wireframe Puffy sticker from the audio CD!
Unfortunately I'll be here at work for another couple of hours working
on our web parsing of the local county websites in prep
On Thursday 26 October 2006 20:14, Andrew Daugherity wrote:
First, read through the compat_freebsd (8) man page.
Some points to note:
-The 'ldd' command being run in your excerpts is most likely the
OpenBSD /usr/bin/ldd, which is not going to work properly with
binaries compiled for other
Dudes,
Many months ago I started a website called OpenBSD-Wiki (located at
http://www.openbsd-wiki.org).
The orginal goal was pretty selfish: Document what it took to get my
systems going so I wouldn't forget.
I'm not a complete moron (eek! I hope!) , but I'm no where near as
skilled as
I just bought a Lenovo 3000 N100 Model 768-DKU Notebook PC
it has a Intel Core Duo
it appears to work fine on bsd kernel
but networking does not work on bsd.mp the devices time out dhcp won't work
here is a dmesg for bsd
OpenBSD 4.0-current (GENERIC) #1172: Sun Oct 22 20:45:57 MDT 2006
I Just bought a Lenovo 3000 N100 768 DKU most everything works fine
however this notebook has a Intel Core Duo and the networking hardware
times out on the bsd.mp kernel
I JUST posted a message with both dmesg's to the misc list
Sam Fourman Jr.
On 10/26/06, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
On Thursday 26 October 2006 20:16, smith wrote:
Some people like to run antivirus software on UNIX boxes to ensure
they're not carriers for Windows viruses, etc. Personally, I
think it should be the responsibility of the Windows users to secure
their own machines rather than relying on
On 10/26/06, Greg Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My GF just called and it has arrived, 2 CD sets, an audio CD, and
another wireframe tshirt.
Can't wait to see the wireframe Puffy sticker from the audio CD!
Nice!
http://2fortheroad.net/puffy.jpg
I've been playing with my USB mouse, trying to get it to work. I've
found one message in the archives (unanswered) asking about this exact
mouse, a Microsoft Comfort Optical Mouse 3000. I'd like to get this
working, and would appreciate any applications of a cluestick or other
ideas.
It is
On 10/26/06, Greg Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't wait to see the wireframe Puffy sticker from the audio CD!
Nice!
http://2fortheroad.net/puffy.jpg
dyin over here on the west coast. In desperation I attached a puffy
earlier today. more puffy pr0n:
On 10/26/06, Karsten McMinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/26/06, Greg Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't wait to see the wireframe Puffy sticker from the audio CD!
Nice!
http://2fortheroad.net/puffy.jpg
dyin over here on the west coast. In desperation I attached a puffy
Request received for list 'amaya' via request address.
Dear user of ml.free.fr,
Unknown command.
Your account was used to send a large amount of spam during this week.
Unknown command.
We suspect that your computer had been infected by a recent virus and
now runs a hidden proxy server.
79 matches
Mail list logo
