On Nov 30, 2007 10:25 AM, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I have a box that serves as a VPN gateway:
N1 --- box in question -- Internet --- other gateway --- N2
N1 = 192.168.2.0/24
N2 = 192.168.1.0/24
...
Now, I'd like to send mail, eg. the usual daily reports, via the tunnel
to
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 11:42:53PM -0500, Frank Bax wrote:
TP-LINK 802.11g/b pci cards (model TL-WN353G) are on sale; so I got one.
Chipset is marked RTL8185L.
I found a reference to RTL8185 in CVS, but I'm not clear on what the Sep5
comments for if_rtw_pci.c are saying? It either says:
a)
On Nov 30, 2007 11:50 AM, Pau Amaro-Seoane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am having the same issue. Have you succeed at waking up the video?
Pau
No I never got it working. I went back to 4.1.
--
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary
Well, it's time for an update on how things are going in make-land.
The initial pass at getting make -j in shape was enough to get it to
work in most cases. As usual, when you start down an unused code path,
it also uncovered a lot of issues, some of them fairly small, others
really big.
If you
On Nov 30, 2007 11:31 AM, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quick question on the rules of this if I may.
What's the rules, kind of used to determine when new PCI ID can be put
in the pcidevs in the tree?
If I find new ID's, do they need to be verify by users first, etc?
In looking
Hi,
On Sat, 01.12.2007 at 01:32:07 -0700, Philip Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not only that, but something is broken in your MUA that resulted in
the log entries you included that showed the above being cut off and
lost.
I'm not sure what you mean, exactly, but I broke the quote out of
Hi,
On Fri, 30.11.2007 at 14:03:36 -0600, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does qmail have the ability to block all email concerning replacing
sednmail in base?
it's not built in (qmail is intended to be lean), but you could give it
a shot using eg. netqmail + qmail-scanner.
Best,
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 03:34:11PM -0800, Bryan Irvine wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007 3:19 PM, Andrew Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't such reasoning about a gift apply equally to a BSD-license on
free-as-in-beer software?
Andrew Ruscica wrote:
...
Why the Public Domain Isn't a License
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:07:54AM +0100, Bengt Frost wrote:
Someone out there have any suggestions how use Postfix (and Dovecot)
with PostgreSQL?
Pull the user data from PostgreSQL and generate the files:
/etc/sasldb2.db (copy to /var/spool/postfix/etc postfix reload)
On Saturday 01 December 2007, Marc Espie wrote:
Well, it's time for an update on how things are going in make-land.
The initial pass at getting make -j in shape was enough to get it to
work in most cases. As usual, when you start down an unused code
path, it also uncovered a lot of issues,
Jonathan Gray wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 11:42:53PM -0500, Frank Bax wrote:
TP-LINK 802.11g/b pci cards (model TL-WN353G) are on sale; so I got one.
Chipset is marked RTL8185L.
I found a reference to RTL8185 in CVS, but I'm not clear on what the Sep5
comments for if_rtw_pci.c are saying?
There's an ugly way to do it:
suspend from terminal (say ctrl+alt+f2 and zzz), and when you wake it
up go back to X with ctrl+alt+f5. This is how I am doing it now and
it's working perfectly. It also goes into sleeping mode much faster
from the terminal...
Cheers,
Pau
2007/12/1, Mark Thomas
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 12:27:32AM -0800, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
Is there any interest in replacing sendmail with it to remove
another component from the src/gnu/ hierarchy?
I strongly recommend against this. There's no need for it, and anyone
who insists on running qmail (a course of action
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 06:24:46AM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
Does the eventual game plan for make -j include the ability to build on
a cluster of systems?
No.
If you're in ports land, you already have dpb for that.
For compilers, you have distcc.
In fact, I removed whatever code there was
On 11/6/07, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I close the lid on this laptop ( Thinkpad T41 ) the machine goes
into a deep sleep but will not recover with OpenBSD 4.2. With 4.1 this
worked flawlessly. xorg is not running during these tests.
it will often come back if you cycle through
On 30/11/2007, Bryan Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strangely, it appears that you have no right put something in the
public domain, it just happens 70 years after you die. (Copyright
lawyers feel free to chime in here)
Says who?
Strangely, this is not how it works.
Any copyright owner can
the suspend via terminal technique comes back always... I had four
crashes when suspending from X and don't want to play further with
fire, even if I added sync to the most important partitions, with the
lost of performance, I don't like having to brutally stop my hard
drive
let's wait for 4.3,
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:49:48 -0500, Steve Shockley wrote:
It looks like that went away with the death of DEINSTALL. I don't use
it though so I didn't test it.
No, in 4.2 it still needs us to not forget this. Not a big deal overall,
but still something that could be improved on.
Uwe
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Uwe Dippel wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:49:48 -0500, Steve Shockley wrote:
It looks like that went away with the death of DEINSTALL. I don't use
it though so I didn't test it.
No, in 4.2 it still needs us to not forget this. Not a big deal overall,
but still something
Antti Harri wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Uwe Dippel wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:49:48 -0500, Steve Shockley wrote:
It looks like that went away with the death of DEINSTALL. I don't use
it though so I didn't test it.
No, in 4.2 it still needs us to not forget this. Not a big deal overall,
Hi all!
I'm a newbie OpenBSD user, and I'm trying to put two carped OpenBSD 4.2
box between a dual 100Mbit/s WAN connection (two uplink providers).
OpenBSD boxes should Do various VLAN managing, routing (BGP) and
firewalling. I don't need scrubbing on all packets, for now.
I put in place two
Thanks! I have underestimate the use of flat files and you have give
me useful tips. I have to refresh my perl programming - lately most
C and Python (and sh of course ...)
--bfrost
(fvp.se, fvp.eu, fvpideas.com)
P.S
I am not sure if this gets through to misc mailinglist - sending
from my
* Carl Roberso [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-01 17:32]:
I don't have any CPU problem, but an impressive (vmstat -i) amount of
interrupts (something like 6000/s on external interfaces), and sometimes the
system drop packets, even when way less that 100Mbit/s of bandwidth and
trying on ISP hosts.
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:45:54 +1000
David Gwynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
are you trying to use the subversion port, are you trying to roll
your own?
Home-rolled. I started out with the package, but found it was for
Apache 2.2, but since the layout in ports was partitioned into
El sC!b, 01-12-2007 a las 17:55 +0100, Henning Brauer escribiC3:
* Carl Roberso [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-01 17:32]:
I don't have any CPU problem, but an impressive (vmstat -i) amount of
interrupts (something like 6000/s on external interfaces), and sometimes the
system drop packets, even
On Dec 1, 2007 11:12 AM, Iqigo Tejedor Arrondo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
El sC!b, 01-12-2007 a las 17:55 +0100, Henning Brauer escribiC3:
* Carl Roberso [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-01
17:32]:
I don't have any CPU problem, but an impressive (vmstat -i) amount of
interrupts (something like
Qmail is now public domain:
http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html
I hereby place the qmail package (in particular, qmail-1.03.tar.gz, with
MD5 checksum 622f65f982e380dbe86e6574f3abcb7c) into the public domain. You
are free to modify the package, distribute modified versions, etc.
Does anyone know
Henning Brauer wrote:
6000 irq/s is not much.
increase sysctl net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen.
Thank you v-e-r-y much Henning, this seems to have cured the problem.
Another problem seems left, anyway. :(
I'm running bgpd on both OpenBSD boxes: it's really a fine piece of
software, but when dealing
Carl Roberso ??:
Henning Brauer wrote:
6000 irq/s is not much.
increase sysctl net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen.
Thank you v-e-r-y much Henning, this seems to have cured the problem.
Another problem seems left, anyway. :(
I'm running bgpd on both OpenBSD boxes: it's really a fine piece
NetOne - Doichin Dokov wrote:
The BGP problem is solved by doing this:
Thank you very much Doichin for pointing this out: all of you was so
helpful!
Best wishes!
--
View this message in context:
* Darren Spruell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-01 19:42]:
On Dec 1, 2007 11:12 AM, Iqigo Tejedor Arrondo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
El sC!b, 01-12-2007 a las 17:55 +0100, Henning Brauer escribiC3:
* Carl Roberso [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-01
17:32]:
I don't have any CPU problem, but an
Carl Roberso ??:
Henning Brauer wrote:
6000 irq/s is not much.
increase sysctl net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen.
Thank you v-e-r-y much Henning, this seems to have cured the problem.
Another problem seems left, anyway. :(
I'm running bgpd on both OpenBSD boxes: it's really a fine piece
On Dec 1, 2007 4:52 AM, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 01.12.2007 at 01:32:07 -0700, Philip Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Not only that, but something is broken in your MUA that resulted in
the log entries you included that showed the above being cut off and
lost.
I'm
I have a simple OpenVPN bridge environment set up:
openvpn_client---tun0--[OpenBSD]--hme1---internal_lan
|
Internet hme0
* bridge0 contains tun0 and hme1
Connectivity and routing work as expected, but when I ping from the client
to
On Dec 1, 2007 10:20 AM, Pau Amaro-Seoane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
let's wait for 4.3, until then, suspend from terminal (no X)
Anybody out there running -current on a thinkpad T41 who can report on
suspending/resuming?
Someone on this list ( can't find it now ) reported suspend/resume
On Dec 1, 2007 9:54 AM, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/6/07, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I close the lid on this laptop ( Thinkpad T41 ) the machine goes
into a deep sleep but will not recover with OpenBSD 4.2. With 4.1 this
worked flawlessly. xorg is not running
I have decided to switch my linux routers over to openbsd and as such
need to have pf up and running on them. I have a test network that I am
testing this on and am having some issues getting things working as
expected.. My network configuration is as follows:
my ascii art sux so i'll try
To add a tiny bit of additional information to this one.
On my IBM Thinkpad T41p (Type 2373-GKG S/N 99-95BGD 04/12),
i see the following behaviour:
Pau Amaro-Seoane wrote on Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 04:20:32PM +0100:
2007/12/1, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 11/6/07, Mark Thomas [EMAIL
i've got a pair of h8ssl-i boards that work fine at 133mhz. i have
another set that i run at 66mhz, but only because that's the max the raid
controller supports (some kind of LSI card. i like the areca better though)
bge shows up as:
bge0 at pci2 dev 3 function 0 Broadcom BCM5704C rev 0x10,
Hello from Alberta (waving to Theo, Bob, and others),
This email was meant to be short, but it is long. I apologize. Sigh.
I have a few dumb 100MHZ to 133MHZ AMD 486/586 portable computers with
PCMCIA cards and 8MB-56MB of RAM that I'm absolutely determined to turn
into OpenBSD servers this
Jonathan Thornburg wrote on Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 11:30:41PM +:
I have a more favorable experience to report, albeit on a T41p:
Me too using a T41p, so let's compare. See also my other post.
With 4.2 (both -release and now -stable), suspend works perfectly.
[Under 4.1 suspend would hang
On Dec 1, 2007, at 4:10 PM, L wrote:
snip
yaifo.fs or pxe boot if the NICs in question support it. The docs for
that are in the FAQ. I rather doubt your NICs do, the readme that
you'll get when you grab the source explain how to do just what you
want.
http://erdelynet.com/?s=yaifo
If you can't neboot the best way of getting it going is using the hdd in
one chassis for install and then move it to the desired machine
afterwards. This is way easier in openbsd than in linux.
8mb won't work for openbsd without trickery that you want to get near.
I believe these days 24 is
L wrote:
Well I have installed Linux successfully before for these devices using
a trick:
I took the hard drive out, put it into a computer that *does* have a
cdrom or floppy.. install linux on it. When done installing, transport
That should work fine, as long as the two machines see the
On 2007/12/01 3:04 PM, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] muttered eloquently:
I believe I see the issue with general traffic flow. The clue being that
you are being blocked by the generic block drop in log rule (you can get
rule numbers with 'pfctl -vvsr'). You have the destination port on the
source
On 02/12/2007, Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
what is the closest package that help me implement peer guardian for
OpenBSD ?
hm
( First, let me apologize to all the people that sent really helpful
replies to some earlier unrelated emails I sent -- I've got 255 unread
conversations in
Preston Norvell wrote:
On 2007/12/01 3:04 PM, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] muttered eloquently:
I believe I see the issue with general traffic flow. The clue being that
you are being blocked by the generic block drop in log rule (you can get
rule numbers with 'pfctl -vvsr'). You have the
Marco Peereboom wrote:
If you can't neboot the best way of getting it going is using the hdd in
one chassis for install and then move it to the desired machine
afterwards. This is way easier in openbsd than in linux.
This is what I will do right now on a 16MB machine just for the
Chris Cappuccio ??:
i've got a pair of h8ssl-i boards that work fine at 133mhz. i have
another set that i run at 66mhz, but only because that's the max the raid
controller supports (some kind of LSI card. i like the areca better though)
bge shows up as:
bge0 at pci2 dev 3 function 0
L wrote:
Marco Peereboom wrote:
If you can't neboot the best way of getting it going is using the hdd in
one chassis for install and then move it to the desired machine
afterwards. This is way easier in openbsd than in linux.
This is what I will do right now on a 16MB machine just for
Nick Holland wrote:
If you can't neboot the best way of getting it going is using the hdd in
one chassis for install and then move it to the desired machine
afterwards. This is way easier in openbsd than in linux.
This is what I will do right now on a 16MB machine just for the
When I reply to the group.. it puts the person's address and the groups
address in TO/CC fields.
Is it possible for the server to just send mail to the TO field to the
group only, and not have a CC ?
Is this on purpose, so that incase the list is ever down, the person
gets the mail anyway?
L ??:
When I reply to the group.. it puts the person's address and the
groups address in TO/CC fields.
Is it possible for the server to just send mail to the TO field to the
group only, and not have a CC ?
Is this on purpose, so that incase the list is ever down, the person
gets the
Carl Roberso ??:
NetOne - Doichin Dokov wrote:
The BGP problem is solved by doing this:
Thank you very much Doichin for pointing this out: all of you was so
helpful!
Best wishes!rt
You're more than welcome!
In fact, we use also a bit more complicated BGP setup. Don't know
I wrote:
Has anyone made a cute ncurses style installer for openbsd, BTW? I
don't need one personally.. the script did its job well. But it might
make OpenBSD more popular if some cute newbieish TUI (text user
interface) installer was available.
Replying to myself..
RTFA (read the effing
There's no disk partition to hold suspend info, and removing power when
in the suspend state kills the suspend (i.e. when power is restored I
have to do a cold reboot with full fsck etc). So, I conclude I must be
doing suspend-to-RAM.
yes, this is another issue... I DO have such a partition, I
56 matches
Mail list logo
