-Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Adam Jacob Muller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: 27.02.08 05:57:42
An: Juan Miscaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Cameron Schaus [EMAIL PROTECTED], misc@openbsd.org
Betreff: Re: pop-before-smtp and spamd
pop-before-smtp is highly insecure.
Use SMTP auth.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:25:04AM +0800, Wong Peter wrote:
Hello all respect network administrator, i have set up a openbsd gateway but
the wireless connection(gateway) is not detected by client but before this
is ok. Can see it widnows but now cannot. I don't know what wrong with it.
I
NAT.
-Adam
On Feb 27, 2008, at 3:49 AM, Stefan Wollny wrote:
Adam,
could you please point to where to find more information on why pop-
before-smtp is highly insecure? Or provide here a little bit of
background information?
It would be really appreciated.
Thank you!
-STEFAN
Adam,
could you please point to where to find more information on why
pop-before-smtp is highly insecure? Or provide here a little bit of background
information?
It would be really appreciated.
Thank you!
-STEFAN
-Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Adam Jacob Muller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
The spamd.alloweddomains method is useful
Hi, Peter.
Where can i find more information about spamd.alloweddomains?
It doesn't appear in spamd(8) (OpenBSD 4.2 -release, i386).
Thanks very much.
Zhang Huangbin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Where can i find more information about spamd.alloweddomains?
It doesn't appear in spamd(8) (OpenBSD 4.2 -release, i386).
It should, in the GREYTRAPPING section (page down a few screenfuls)
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149
2008/2/25, Don Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The issue is that when building and installing new kernels (eg, when a
new security patch is released), it is not totally obvious to the
(automated) build script what the file /bsd really is, is it the
uniprocessor kernel, or a link to the
Brad Arrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I ran into the same problem you did, I thought it was something I
was doing wrong until I read your email...
Here is the fix I came up with.
--- check_tcp.c-current Mon Feb 25 15:11:40 2008
+++ check_tcp.c Mon Feb 25 23:48:45 2008
@@ -82,6
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 01:15:56PM +0100, Piotrek Kapczuk wrote:
2008/2/25, Don Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The issue is that when building and installing new kernels (eg, when a
new security patch is released), it is not totally obvious to the
(automated) build script what the file /bsd
Sun +Mysql.. The mysql database will be portable in the next Openbsd
versions? How openbsd team loook this?
Quoting Gustavo Polillo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sun +Mysql.. The mysql database will be portable in the next Openbsd
versions? How openbsd team loook this?
OpenBSD has had a MySQL port for nearly 9 years now.* I would imagine
that nothing will change in that respect, and from everything that
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Gustavo Polillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sun +Mysql.. The mysql database will be portable in the next Openbsd
versions? How openbsd team loook this?
Didn't quite grasp your mail clearly, but based on what-ever I
understood of it, here goes;
SUN is going to
Hi,
Did you use http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#Backup to restore your old
box to a vmware server image. The only part I am confused by is At the end
I installed the boot loader as described in the manpages with success. What
man page are you referring to? What steps did you use to
Tim Donahue wrote:
Quoting Gustavo Polillo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sun +Mysql.. The mysql database will be portable in the next Openbsd
versions? How openbsd team loook this?
OpenBSD has had a MySQL port for nearly 9 years now.* I would imagine
that nothing will change in that respect, and
Hi Pierre-Yves,
I guess we are both wrong...
I used a few different timeout values including 1000 before
changing any code. I just checked relayd(the unpatched version) again and I
get the same results.
These web servers just serve the default apache index page.
I can connect to them instantly
Brad Arrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Pierre-Yves,
I guess we are both wrong...
I used a few different timeout values including 1000 before
changing any code. I just checked relayd(the unpatched version) again
and I get the same results.
These web servers just serve the default
Sorry, I refered to the second example in installboot(8) :
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=installbootapropos=0sektion=0;
manpath=OpenBSD+Currentarch=i386format=html
It's the same as this step from your linked FAQ
# cp /usr/mdec/boot /mnt/boot
# /usr/mdec/installboot -v /mnt/boot
This is a totally non-technical solution, but reading what you wrote I
immediately thought:
How much of these 56 GB of data is changing? Is the bulk of this data
stuff that you *need* to constantly access for the next couple of
weeks? If not, then wouldn't it be much safer to just take one of the
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:53:03AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote:
Your fix is wrong, you run in a timeout which happens because the
default relayd configuration supposes you are in the same broadcast
domain than your relayed host and has a 200ms timeout.
While my relay server isn't in the
While doing a direct upgrade of an amd64 machine from -current (approx
end of Jan) to the Feb 26 snapshot, the installer stalls on
base43.tgz. This happens at 99%, 46640KB.
I've tried the following three methods with the same results:
- bsd.rd and get sets from an ftp mirror
- bsd.rd and get
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 06:28:40PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote:
Please try with an insanely high value (10seconds) and see if you still
get a connection timeout message.
To make logging more meaningful you can try with this diff and send me
the relayd -dv output:
I can't set timeout
Hi Ben,
Try changing the interval value to a higher value.
I tested it the results are the same. (with timeout set to 10 seconds)
-Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:27:19 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: relayd http check connection
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Matthew Mulrooney wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Marco Peereboom wrote:
My natural answer is that this is a firmware issue. But since you
I will upgrade the firmware and rerun my test case.
I've upgraded my firmware to the latest version:
Firmware version: 252D
From man (8) atactl:
apmset power-management-level
Enables and sets the advanced power management level to the re-
quested level on the specified device (if supported). Device
performance may increase with increasing power management levels
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 02:18:12PM -0500, Andrew Ruscica wrote:
While doing a direct upgrade of an amd64 machine from -current (approx
end of Jan) to the Feb 26 snapshot, the installer stalls on
base43.tgz. This happens at 99%, 46640KB.
...
Nest step will be to do a clean install.
The clean
I know queuing only applies to outbound traffic. I'm using ssh -w
tunnelling to the pf+gateway. I, therefore, have
pass in on #ext_if inet proto tcp ... keep state queue (QSHH, QLOWLAT),
which, if I understand correctly, should assign the stateful
reply/return (outbound) traffic be queued on
I find it somewhat astonishing, bordering on the incredible, that
someone who claims to be knowledgeable about such things as spamd and
a few related pieces of software would first post to this list with a
reply-to address that the recipient mail server bounces as
undeliverable, then later
Heya misc:
Base dhcpd and named are failing to start after an update. I'm really
confused at this point. Other daemons are working fine and I can't see
anything else 'wrong' with the system. Any thoughts at all would be
greatly appreciated.
This was a 4.2-release system. I followed the standard
Dear list,
I have a firewall and an ipsec.conf with 42 ike esp connections:
ike esp from 192.168.100.0/24 to 192.168.129.0/24 peer my.firewall \
main auth hmac-sha1 enc 3des group modp1024 \
quick auth hmac-sha1 enc 3des group modp1024 \
psk mekmitasdigoat tag yet.another.connection
Nick Holland wrote:
Don Jackson wrote:
I use serial consoles on all my OpenBSD servers for remote serial
access to the machines, both during initial install via pxeboot, and
later on in regular use after the install.
I'm currently running either 4.2 or 4.1 on all my machines.
The FAQ
Hello all respect network administrator, i have set up a openbsd gateway but
the wireless connection(gateway) is not detected by client but before this
is ok. Can see it widnows but now cannot. I don't know what wrong with it.
I sure my configuration is ok because i didn't edit it.
Another problem
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Wong Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all respect network administrator, i have set up a openbsd gateway but
the wireless connection(gateway) is not detected by client but before this
is ok. Can see it widnows but now cannot. I don't know what wrong with
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:38 PM, xSAPPYx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heya misc:
Base dhcpd and named are failing to start after an update. I'm really
confused at this point. Other daemons are working fine and I can't see
anything else 'wrong' with the system. Any thoughts at all would be
Girish Venkatachalam schreef:
wd0 lost interrupt. fsbn blah blah blah 234023409-234234..
You get it?
The SMPS in the PC is not able to provide the power that these higher
capacity disk's stepper motors demand.
It never occurred to me so far that disk failures were a natural
consequence of my
Jeff Quast wrote:
you need to declare a bypass flow on the side of the network where the router,
presumably on 192.168.0.0/24 requires communication to the local network
segment also on 192.168.0.0/24. It is probobly trying to send this across the
tunneled wire, which won't reach its
i now have a session i turned on update loging ob bpgd but the routes do not
get inserted. any ideas?
AS41412: update 123.123.123.0/24 via xxx..xx. ( the router where
the network is, yes pingable)
Erich schrieb:
Claudio Jeker schrieb:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:51:05AM +0100, Erich
36 matches
Mail list logo
