It's running fine in console or X (just a longer start).Ofcourse,that you can't
use Firefox or similiar SW :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 5:00 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Eh?
What about New browser are you talking? ;-)
I don't know,that lynx(1) which is in base (! ;-)) has option about:plugins .
All others are not in base,just option and every user of OpenBSD know,that
he/she must be careful about installing SW,which is not in base.
Hi,
How can I test it ? In the snapshots/i386 I have all I need for the
installation, but I don't find the sys.tar.gz (needed to recompile the
kernel with the raid features).
As next I have actuelly 2 possibilities
* go in production with the 4.3 version, without raid (may be with a rsync
Hi,
I am trying to setup IPsec and also exclude some parts from getting
processed by IPsec.
In IPSEC.CONF(5) the description says
[...]
from src [port sport] to dst [port dport]
[...]
The optional port modifiers restrict the flows to the specified ports
[...]
It is possible to supply
Our awk do not recognize range regex operator ({n,m} syntax). But man
page says:
awk supports extended regular expressions (EREs). See re_format(7) for
more information on regular expressions.
This behavior is same as in FreeBSD. gawk recognize range operator in
POSIX mode (--posix).
As far
Offre spiciale 10hme anniversaire :
Abonnez-vous un an pour 89 ⬠HT au Magazine
et ` la News-letter hebdo Evinements d'entreprise
et recevez en cadeau le Guide des salons de 300 pages
Abonnez-vous pour un an
au Magazine bimestriel et
` la news-letter ilectronique hebdomadaire Evinements
Ok.I promise,that I will be more quiet.I'm known,that sometimes i talk too much
:-D (it started when I was small).
I know,that Google has new browser,but where is word Google or Chrome in his
email,that it's about this browser?
OT = off topic
-Original Message-
From: Mark Smith
Tomas Bodzar wrote:
Eh?
What about New browser are you talking? ;-)
I don't know,that lynx(1) which is in base (! ;-)) has option about:plugins .
All others are not in base,just option and every user of OpenBSD know,that
he/she must be careful about installing SW,which is not in base.
Hi misc@,
this is my first post so please bare with me.
I'm trying to get a wg311v2 to work in a Sun Ultra 60 workstation under
-current (snapshot from aug. 27th). Firmware is installed. Everything seems ok
however although it seems to connect to the AP, dhclient won't get an IP
address from
Maybe this part of email leads to my reaction :
For a group of people, who took the time to draw a bunch of cartoons to explain
that they view security as something very very important, to fumble so badly,
is really... sad.
OpenBSD is drawing bunch of cartoons too,not mainly about
On 2008-09-04, Christophe Rioux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I test it ? In the snapshots/i386 I have all I need for the
installation,
too late, this is now past 4.4.
On 2008-09-04, Tomas Bodzar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Super,but why isn't this important info on some known place?
When the releveant developers think it's ready to put in a
public place, they'll put it there.
I didn't want to undermine that so I sent my message to you
off-list. Please check the
On 2008-09-04, Jeff Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, that covers Google, all right. And then somebody called
Websitewelcome.com gives me major grief. Is the only way to do this to wait
for someone to complain that mail isn't going through?
No, you can also tell from spamdb output.
:-/ Upss.Sorry
Thanks for help.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stuart Henderson
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 11:35 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Info about DRI support and setup
On 2008-09-04, Tomas Bodzar [EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've searched the FAQ and the Web for any guidance on what the minimum RAM
is for OpenBSD, with and without X.
I just acquired a Compaq Armada 1125 laptop that maxes out at 24 MB of
RAM, and I'm wondering whether or not it's feasible to run OpenBSD on it.
From
Steve Shockley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, OpenBSD will run. It's going to be slow, it's only a Pentium
100. I ran OpenBSD on a P133 for a while, I had to run the older
version of X because the video wasn't supported by the new version,
not sure if that's still the case.
The archives will
Markus Bergkvist wrote:
2.00 GHz cpu with unknown speedstep is reported to have 2200 MHz as
highest speed. Feature or defect? :-) Does this deserve a PR posting or
is it ongoing work?
$ apm -L sysctl hw.cpuspeed
hw.cpuspeed=1200
$ apm -H sysctl hw.cpuspeed
hw.cpuspeed=2200
Have you
AFAIK it's not supported in IKE, so it's not supported in ipsec.conf
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 10:37:25AM +0200, Michael wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to setup IPsec and also exclude some parts from getting
processed by IPsec.
In IPSEC.CONF(5) the description says
[...]
from src [port sport]
Hi,
thanks for your answer.
Markus Friedl schrieb:
AFAIK it's not supported in IKE, so it's not supported in ipsec.conf
Something like port { 1000 1001 ... } would be nice too, but also
doesn't seem to work. It works for from/to { IP1 IP2 ... } though. At
least I did not manage to set it
That diff made speedstep work on my Dell D600, but the acpicpu_setpdc
code was reverted
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvsm=121801217417287w=2
and the patch does not apply any longer, thus the speedstep stopped
working on the D600. gwk was notified of the downgrade.
Last time I looked at it was
I was considering buying one of these (cheap, small and quiet) to be used as
an OpenBSD firewall. It has one free slot for an additional NIC. Has anyone
ran OpenBSD on one of these before? I can't try before buying.
Here are the hardware details:
En breves palabras:
Si necesita 335 (euro) por semana de ganancia adicional, podemos darle un
trabajo a distancia
Su tarea sera contestar a las consultas de nuestros clientes por telifono o
Internet.
El trabajo no es difmcil y la capacitacisn es gratuita.
Si esta interesado o tiene alguna
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Tomas Bodzar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Super,but why isn't this important info on some known place?
Because it's not important. If you aren't following cvs, then there's
little reason to document fatures that only exist in cvs.
If I use Google,than there is
Peter N. M. Hansteen escreveu:
Steve Shockley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, OpenBSD will run. It's going to be slow, it's only a Pentium
100. I ran OpenBSD on a P133 for a while, I had to run the older
version of X because the video wasn't supported by the new version,
not sure if
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:34:12 +0700, Reyk Floeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 04:05:50PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
no point in just doing that.
a button to change the ether type would make sense.
this is not trivial because it would require a change in the Rx path
2008/9/4 Peter N. M. Hansteen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Steve Shockley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, OpenBSD will run. It's going to be slow, it's only a Pentium
100. I ran OpenBSD on a P133 for a while, I had to run the older
version of X because the video wasn't supported by the new version,
not
Oh come on .. there's no challenge in 16M. Less, that's where it gets
really interesting (if you're in to BSDM, of course ;)
OpenBSD 4.4-beta (GENERIC) #0: Thu Jul 10 11:55:18 CEST 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T8300 @ 2.40GHz
ln: /obsd: Operation not permitted
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC (line 888 of Makefile).
--running as root
Hi!
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 08:01:35AM -0700, Doug Milam wrote:
ln: /obsd: Operation not permitted
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC (line 888 of Makefile).
--running as root
Have you ever set an immutable flag? (ls -lo /bsd /nbsd /obsd)
Kind regards,
Hannah.
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 12:35:20PM +0400, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
Our awk do not recognize range regex operator ({n,m} syntax). But man
page says:
awk supports extended regular expressions (EREs). See re_format(7) for
more information on regular expressions.
This behavior is same as in
On 2008-09-04, Giancarlo Razzolini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never ran with 24MB, but note mentioned that I've run an openbsd
firewall on a pentium 133, with 32MB of ram. It had everything a
firewall for home uses need, DNS, DHCP and the firewall rules. I've
upgraded to 64MB so i could run a
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 04:46:07PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
| Oh come on .. there's no challenge in 16M. Less, that's where it gets
| really interesting (if you're in to BSDM, of course ;)
OK, at 8MB it runs with a non-GENERIC kernel, still booting with all
the default services (including
Hi!
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 06:19:30PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 04:46:07PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
| Oh come on .. there's no challenge in 16M. Less, that's where it gets
| really interesting (if you're in to BSDM, of course ;)
OK, at 8MB it runs with a non-GENERIC
Hello misc@
I've read through the FAQ and done some searching on the mailing lists +
google, but I cannot find a definitive answer to my question. To keep
it simple, I'm looking at installing OpenBSD on a ThinkPad T61p w/Intel
Core 2 Duo. I've been reading that the amd64 platform will work
I've read through the FAQ and done some searching on the mailing lists +
google, but I cannot find a definitive answer to my question. To keep
it simple, I'm looking at installing OpenBSD on a ThinkPad T61p w/Intel
Core 2 Duo. I've been reading that the amd64 platform will work however
the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stuart Henderson
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 12:11 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Can OpenBSD run in 24 MB of RAM?
On 2008-09-04, Giancarlo Razzolini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never ran
Thank you Theo for the quick reply. I will give it a shot as it appears
from your answer the newer Intel processors should have this
functionality, albeit named very unconventionally. Would there be
something in dmesg that would indicate proper W^X support once
installed?
Maybe one of these
This is OT, but I am curious as to the application that makes no-execute a
killer feature for you?
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Brian Drain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello misc@
I've read through the FAQ and done some searching on the mailing lists +
google, but I cannot find a definitive
Thank you Theo for the quick reply. I will give it a shot as it appears
from your answer the newer Intel processors should have this
functionality, albeit named very unconventionally. Would there be
something in dmesg that would indicate proper W^X support once
installed?
cpu0:
Hello Patric -
No particular application but as an available security feature, albeit
not the panacea the masses thought it would be when released, I was just
curious how it potentially worked (or didn't work) with the Intel
processors using amd64. I can say in the environments I've been in, NX
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
I've searched the FAQ and the Web for any guidance on what the minimum RAM
is for OpenBSD, with and without X.
I just acquired a Compaq Armada 1125 laptop that maxes out at 24 MB of
RAM, and I'm wondering whether or not it's feasible to run OpenBSD on it.
No.
Just a general statement regarding some vendors being completely inept
at letting developers get access to what they think is IP and
preventing them from running hardware that they purchased on whatever
platform they want without the need to reverse engineer it.
-Original Message-
On 9/4/08, Brian Drain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe one of these days closed hardware vendors like Intel, Creative,
etc., will open up a bit and provide the necessary support to people
trying to write software that will flawlessly work with various
hardware, much better than the original
I installed 4.3 onto a Compaq Armada 1500 with 32RAM. I got nginx
working with PHP though fastcgi but before i could test it any further
i got it upgraded to 96MB. It was handling it well enough with 32, i
guess... you can't really tell just how much RAM is in deed being
used. I'm still keeping
On 2008-09-04, Wade, Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been meaning to change over to djbdns, I just haven't yet.
take a look at Unbound (port/package in 4.4/-current), it's quite nice.
I used to run OpenBSD 4.2 on a sun SparcClassic with 24MB and it ran
pretty cool, i used the box as web server and vpn gateway, 2 users had
screen sessions with irssi and mcabber.
Hello hello!
I was quite shocked today when I heard I could use pf to block against DDoS
attacks, using Stateful Tracking Options,
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/filter.html#stateopts.
But does anybody have any nice setups of this they'd want to share?
Much obliged, and thanks.
--
Hi.
--- L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 03:11 PM 9/3/2008 -0700, Aaron Glenn wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 3:50 PM, L. V. Lammert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone seen something like the 2.1
proxy_balancer we could use with
1.3?
I know than mod_accel work as reverse proxy
Pre-orders for OpenBSD 4.4 (CD, tshirt, poster) are up at
http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html
As well, the new song for the release is also being made available at
the same time. This can be found at
http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html
Enjoy the song, and think about
Doug Milam wrote:
Thanks; that was my best guess since these commands are part of a
shell script. In any case, this script was run as root (not merely using
sudo).
--- On Sun, 8/24/08, Philip Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Philip Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ln:
On 2008-09-03, L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 03:11 PM 9/3/2008 -0700, Aaron Glenn wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 3:50 PM, L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone seen something like the 2.1 proxy_balancer we could use with
1.3?
Lee
skimming the proxy_balancer
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 09:23:09PM +0200, Redd Vinylene wrote:
Hello hello!
I was quite shocked today when I heard I could use pf to block against DDoS
attacks, using Stateful Tracking Options,
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/filter.html#stateopts.
But does anybody have any nice setups of
What exactly are you looking for? Are you looking for example rulesets?
Thanks
Subhro
On 9/5/08, Redd Vinylene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello hello!
I was quite shocked today when I heard I could use pf to block against DDoS
attacks, using Stateful Tracking Options,
Oliver Peter wrote:
I can recommend reading through this as well:
http://www.bgnett.no/~peter/pf/en/bruteforce.html
You can also use two tables so that the first overload gets shunted to a
slow queue and given a second chance before ending up in the second
table which gets blocked.
-Lars
At 08:17 PM 9/4/2008 +, you wrote:
On 2008-09-03, L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting, .. looks like it might also handle the SSL connection -
thanks!!
transparently, too. (i.e. the web server can see the original
source IP address).
Unfortunately, it doesn't look like
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Pre-orders for OpenBSD 4.4 (CD, tshirt, poster) are up at
http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html
As well, the new song for the release is also being made available at
the same time. This can be found at
On Sep 4, 2008, at 12:23 PM, Redd Vinylene wrote:
I was quite shocked today when I heard I could use pf to block
against DDoS
attacks, using Stateful Tracking Options,
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/filter.html#stateopts.
But does anybody have any nice setups of this they'd want to share?
I'm currently trying to set up and OpenBSD machine (4.4 beta 08/08/23)
To run as a SaMBa server and a music server using the mpd package.
A global windows share known as //Rowena/music has been set up to
gather the songs and I attempted to configure mpd as using that as
the music
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 01:59:04PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
| Pre-orders for OpenBSD 4.4 (CD, tshirt, poster) are up at
|
| http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html
|
| As well, the new song for the release is also being made available at
| the same time. This can be found at
|
|
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Anathae Townsend wrote:
gid 561. Permissions are -rwxrwx---, user _mpd (mpd drops to this user
when started by root, is a member of _mpd and samba.
If I set permissions on the directory to 777, mpd runs fine.
I always saw that behaviour with mpd. I'd be curious if
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Pre-orders for OpenBSD 4.4 (CD, tshirt, poster) are up at
http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html
Do the first X number of pre-orders get autographed... or something :)
--
View this message in context:
2008/9/4 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've searched the FAQ and the Web for any guidance on what the minimum RAM
is for OpenBSD, with and without X.
I just acquired a Compaq Armada 1125 laptop that maxes out at 24 MB of
RAM, and I'm wondering whether or not it's feasible to run OpenBSD on it.
I kept
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Pre-orders for OpenBSD 4.4 (CD, tshirt, poster) are up at
http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html
Do the first X number of pre-orders get autographed... or something :)
Direct ship your copy to me, I'll test it out for you, sign that its a good
copy, and send it
ropers wrote:
2008/9/4 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've searched the FAQ and the Web for any guidance on what the minimum RAM
is for OpenBSD, with and without X.
I just acquired a Compaq Armada 1125 laptop that maxes out at 24 MB of
RAM, and I'm wondering whether or not it's feasible to run OpenBSD
2008/9/4 Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pre-orders for OpenBSD 4.4 (CD, tshirt, poster) are up at
http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html
As well, the new song for the release is also being made available at
the same time. This can be found at
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:33:11 -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
Experienced users usually have no problem figuring out what they
need to run their applications.
Also keep in mind, the goal is most likely not running OpenBSD,
the goal is probably some task which runs on top OpenBSD. 24M is
plenty to sit
new_guy wrote:
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Pre-orders for OpenBSD 4.4 (CD, tshirt, poster) are up at
http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html
Do the first X number of pre-orders get autographed... or something :)
The first X pre-orders get a LOT more than just autographs!! Order now!
[demime could not interpret encoding - treating as plain text]
I still have no success trying all the advice given to me. Dvorak
is still not functional. Anything else I should look into? Please
note, I'm trying to get this to work on the console. This being a
server, I don't have X
ropers wrote:
I'm not, btw. entirely sure why it says 24MB *or* 32MB, but anyway.
Must be the video ram used by AGP...
Well, I've got it. It turns out it's kind of easy, although not
as pretty as it could be.
Basically, you use relayd. The one caveat is that this means that
from the OpenBSD box, you need to be able to talk to the remote,
private IPs without binding to a particular address.
In relayd.conf, you
I have applied the patch supplied by Henning, and now get the following in
my bgpctl show neighbor
Neighbor capabilities:
Multiprotocol extensions: IPv4 Unicast (previously was unknown (128))
yes, with my patch, we simply ignore the annoucement and show the default.
Can this
I'm using dvorak layout on console and on X.
On X I use custom xmodmap to get C$C6 -letters.
On console I have keyboard.encoding=us.dvorak on
/etc/wsconsctl.conf.
One downside is that it doesn't work straight with my
USB-keyboard and I need to manually load dvorak with
sudo kbd us.dvorak and
I have not set an immutable flag, but the current flag is schg for /bsd
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 08:01:35AM -0700, Doug Milam wrote:
ln: /obsd: Operation not permitted
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC (line
888 of Makefile).
--running as root
Have you
It does not, no
Doug Milam wrote:
ln: /obsd: Operation not permitted
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC (line
888 of Makefile).
--running as root
Does make install work when run outside of your script?
Tom
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Doug Milam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not set an immutable flag, but the current flag is schg for /bsd
Then you should talk to the person who did set the immutable flag.
Hello,
My name is April and I work for a company called Theatons Toys, a specialist
manufacturer of mental development toys. We found your website and are
interested in a three-way link exchange. If you place our link on your site, I
will reciprocate a link back to your site (may be a subpage
76 matches
Mail list logo
