* J.C. Roberts list-...@designtools.org [2009-03-21 09:54]:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:16:32 +0100 Henning Brauer
lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
* J.C. Roberts list-...@designtools.org [2009-03-10 02:03]:
The smart answer for an ISP is moving to IPv6
that is about the least smart thing
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:16:32 +0100 Henning Brauer
lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
* J.C. Roberts list-...@designtools.org [2009-03-10 02:03]:
The smart answer for an ISP is moving to IPv6
that is about the least smart thing anybody could do.
Hi Henning,
If everyone continues to avoid IPv6,
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:39:24 -0400 (EDT) Daniel Barowy
dbar...@barowy.net wrote:
Needless to say, getting an operating system to play nice with
firmware that is in an unknown patch state is a major pain in the
ass. The first thing you should try is getting the OpenBSD
4.5-current ISO
Hi,
On Fri, 20.03.2009 at 14:28:46 +0100, Joerg Streckfuss streckf...@dfn-cert.de
wrote:
How does CARP behaves when on the master node two unimportantly interfaces
fail and on the backup node only the uplink interface fails? Does CARP
failover
to the backup node and as consequence the whole
* irix i...@ukr.net [2009-03-09 17:40]:
Sorry, if I been rude. I not administartor of network, i am client.
And other client use MiTM. This network is use unmanaged switches, and
ISP spit on it. That's why i try to find out to protect my
workstation from MiTM, with out static
Am 20.03.2009 um 12:15 schrieb jmc:
--- Marc Balmer [Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 07:36:18PM +0100]: ---
Am 19.03.2009 um 15:27 schrieb Protocol Six Consulting:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone here knows how to integrate the PF
firewall
with ClamAV.
smtp-vilter, which is in ports, does that,
i
* Felipe Alfaro Solana felipe.alf...@gmail.com [2009-03-09 17:07]:
ARP is insecure by default. If you care, move to IPv6 and use IPSec/SeND.
hah. IPv6 makes arp look like the brightest invention ever.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
* Alexey Suslikov alexey.susli...@gmail.com [2009-03-11 16:38]:
The limitation is 2Gb on 32-bit platforms because of off_t (man lseek).
off_t is 64bit on all platforms we support. even vax.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP -
* jmc j...@cosmicnetworks.net [2009-03-11 15:05]:
so anyway, how are _you_ using probability?
it's high on my list of useless features in pf I'd rather remove.
if anybody is actually using it, I'd like to hear about it.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services,
not sure wether it wouldn't be smarter to just have pf scrub drop
these as well.
--- pf_norm.c Sat Mar 21 12:17:44 2009
+++ pf_norm.c.orig Sat Mar 21 12:16:56 2009
@@ -782,11 +782,8 @@
flags = th-th_flags;
if (flags TH_SYN) {
/* Illegal packet */
+
* Thomas Pfaff tpf...@tp76.info [2009-03-10 20:00]:
OpenBSD does not currently support 4GB of RAM.
that is not true.
OpenBSD does not currently support more than 4GB of RAM on amd64, that
is true.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
* irix i...@ukr.net [2009-03-09 15:55]:
In www.openbsd.org wrote Only two remote holes in the default
install, in more than 10 years!, this not true. I using OpenBSD
like customer, not like administrator. And my OpenBSD were attacked,
by simple MiTM attack in arp protocol.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:14:44PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
so anyway, how are _you_ using probability?
it's high on my list of useless features in pf I'd rather remove.
if anybody is actually using it, I'd like to hear about it.
I used it once about two years ago, to simulate a bad
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 09:14:49AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-03-20, Matt open...@women-at-work.org wrote:
Thank you all - that worked (both 'chan' and 'scan').
you should use scan, chan does something else now.
bah, this keeps changing!
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
Henning Brauer wrote:
* jmc j...@cosmicnetworks.net [2009-03-11 15:05]:
so anyway, how are _you_ using probability?
it's high on my list of useless features in pf I'd rather remove.
if anybody is actually using it, I'd like to hear about it.
PF is one of the main factors for me to use
I've been working on a OpenBSD image for a soekris boxes. I've actually made
some headway with some help and pointers from Chris (maker of flashdist).
I have the image mounted to /mnt/etc using vnconfig so I can modify the
files before flashing the image (ie. boot.conf, rc, dhcpd.conf...etc).
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 07:42:31AM -0700, Frothingdog.ca wrote:
I have the image mounted to /mnt/etc using vnconfig so I can modify the
files before flashing the image (ie. boot.conf, rc, dhcpd.conf...etc). But
I'd like to install a coupe packages into the image, such as MTR and TTCP.
Frothingdog.ca wrote:
I have the image mounted to /mnt/...
If you are running the same version, then one way is to chroot to the
new image:
chroot /mnt /bin/ksh
then install the packages you wish.
+Lars
WARNING: contains undecipherable part
Received: from unicornia896a8 (adsl-211-249-192-81.adsl.iam.net.ma
[81.192.249.211])
by mail.cashcom.ma (Postfix/TrioOS) with ESMTP id 065961200A390
for MISC@OPENBSD.ORG; Sat, 21 Mar 2009 16:23:49 + (WET)
From: Agence Casa ElFirdaous
Henning Brauer skrev:
not sure wether it wouldn't be smarter to just have pf scrub drop
these as well.
--- pf_norm.c Sat Mar 21 12:17:44 2009
+++ pf_norm.c.orig Sat Mar 21 12:16:56 2009
@@ -782,11 +782,8 @@
flags = th-th_flags;
if (flags TH_SYN) {
/*
Daniel Barowy wrote:
Hello everyone,
A little searching on the lists and Google don't reveal anyone else
having this problem, so I thought I'd ask for help. I originally tried
installing 4.3 on this machine awhile back, and when I ran into this
problem, I had other things to do, so I
If everyone continues to avoid IPv6, then it will remain less than
useful. I understand IPv6 has less than 1% uptake at the moment, but I
don't understand why employing it (in addition to IPv4 NATing hacks) is
about the least smart thing an ISP could do?
Is it a cost issue?
no, a
Hi Nick,
Thanks for looking at this...
Nick Holland wrote:
Keep in mind the Macs are basically closed, secretive hardware, supported
by a closed, secretive OS provided by the same vendor...so they can stick
workarounds in for odd hardware quirks that no one else knows about (and
they do have
* Garry Dolley gdol...@arpnetworks.com [2009-03-21 20:32]:
If everyone continues to avoid IPv6, then it will remain less than
useful. I understand IPv6 has less than 1% uptake at the moment, but I
don't understand why employing it (in addition to IPv4 NATing hacks) is
about the least
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de
wrote:
* Garry Dolley gdol...@arpnetworks.com [2009-03-21 20:32]:
If everyone continues to avoid IPv6, then it will remain less than
useful. I understand IPv6 has less than 1% uptake at the moment, but I
don't
I'm not sure of the command to run. Can you elaberate on the command.
Please keep in mind I'm pretty new to this.
if using MTR file from here:
ftp://ftp.bitwizard.nl/mtr/mtr-0.75.tar.gz
Thanks again for the help.
Frothingdog.ca wrote:
I've been working on a OpenBSD image for a soekris
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:40:22 -0400 Daniel Barowy m...@barowy.net
wrote:
umass0 at uhub0 port 1 configuration 1 interface 0 Memorex
Flashdrive 303B rev 2.00/1.10 addr 2
umass0: using SCSI over Bulk-Only
scsibus1 at umass0: 2 targets, initiator 0
sd0 at scsibus1 targ 1 lun 0: Memorex,
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:03:45 +0100 Henning Brauer
lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
whoever claims v6 would be any good has never written network code
dealing with it.
hey, compare these two which do the same, one for v4 and one for v6:
snip great code example
don't get me started on the
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 09:21:30PM -0500, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
Is there danger in upgrading to the latest
snapshot using a script?
- fetch tarballs and kernels
- run sysmerge -s etc*.tgz
- run sysmerge -x xetc*.tgz
you realize that sysmerge(8) is interactive, right?
Is there danger in upgrading to the latest
snapshot using a script?
- fetch tarballs and kernels
- run sysmerge -s etc*.tgz
- run sysmerge -x xetc*.tgz
- extract tarballs to their place
- copy over kernels to root dir
- pkg_add -ui -F udate -F updatedepends
- reboot
Thanks,
m
J.C. Roberts wrote:
...
I've got no clue what kind of serial connector is used on your G4
Sawtooth, but if it uses MiniDIN-8F, you can easily find a converter to
DE-9. Run a null-modem cable between the G4 and your x86.
well..here's another feature of the newer MacPPC systems:
no serial port.
Frothingdog.ca wrote:
I'm not sure of the command to run. Can you elaberate on the command.
Please keep in mind I'm pretty new to this.
How about just getting a 1G CF card, and doing a normal install?
What do you gain by inflicting this pain upon yourself?
Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
Is there danger in upgrading to the latest
snapshot using a script?
Usually, or edge case?
- fetch tarballs and kernels
- run sysmerge -s etc*.tgz
- run sysmerge -x xetc*.tgz
as pointed out already, these are interactive programs...
- extract tarballs to
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 11:14:48PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
Is there danger in upgrading to the latest
snapshot using a script?
...
- run sysmerge -s etc*.tgz
- run sysmerge -x xetc*.tgz
as pointed out already, these are interactive programs...
...
-
34 matches
Mail list logo
