hi,
MTU on ethernet vlan interfaces are also 1500. the vlan tag overhead is
handled by the switch and NIC. you do not have to care about that.
run tcpdump on all interfaces and look for the ospf hello packets... and can
you please post the logs... ? you'r not getting any neighbors with ospfctl
On Thursday 07 May 2009 21.45.00 Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 11:14:17AM +0200, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
I put a lot of work into azalia(4) in the last release cycel, and I'd
like to be able to say, when 4.6 release comes, that azalia is
completed.
by completed I mean it
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org wrote:
- benchmark aes-ctr performance with current code vs. optimized
assembly code (e.g., just hacking sys/crypto/rijndael.c to use
optimized code); if no significant improvement, abort
I didn't have the time to devote to
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org wrote:
The eBACS project[1]
times a bunch of different algorithms and implementations on a bunch
of different CPUs.
[1] http://bench.cr.yp.to
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-05-07, carlopmart carlopm...@gmail.com wrote:
Matthew Dempsky wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:47 PM, carlopmart carlopm...@gmail.com wrote:
Which is that sysctl param Stuart??
net.inet.ip.multipath
See http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#Multipath
I have
Darrin Chandler dwchand...@stilyagin.com writes:
This is true of any sites with OpenBSD help. Sometimes I've found some
info on these sites that's saved me much time, but I'd never take the
info without thinking it through myself, check against the man pages,
FAQ, etc.
One common problem is
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 02:27:51PM -0400, Brynet wrote:
Hi Alexander,
Hello,
before we continue I'd like to tell that I'm a kind of newbie in OpenBSD.
I was using FreeBSD for last 5 years, many things in OpenBSD are almost
the same as in FreeBSD (and vice versa) but also there are many
On 2009-05-08, Alexander Shikoff minot...@crete.org.ua wrote:
I only have two serial ports on motherboard, I see them in dmesg:
com0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
com1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
But if I understand correctly they are named as
Hi,
i think this is a pf's bug:
short description:
internal interface with two different ip's in two different lans:
192.168.20.254/24
192.168.21.254/24
They're used as gateway from the two lans.
nat rules: every 10 ip's use a different public ip.
everithing works fine for the first lan, with
This is more of a grammar/wording question, but it does go on to the
security of OS's in general.
Was having a read of this;
http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/04/15/ibotnet-trojan.html
And the last comment made me think about OpenBSD. The article closes by
saying this shows that no
Sebastian Rother sebastian.rother at jpberlin.de writes:
vnconfig -cK 52527 -S saltfile /dev/sd0k /dev/svnd1c
I think that does synchronous writes, even if you mount
the svnd device async or softdep, which is why it is so
slow.
After losing a hard disc image _file_ to fsck on the filesy-
stem
Hi Stuart,
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 10:35:35AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-05-08, Alexander Shikoff minot...@crete.org.ua wrote:
I only have two serial ports on motherboard, I see them in dmesg:
com0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
com1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq
This seems to me not valid.
You can check with
l = {1.1.1.1,1.1.1.2}
block from $l
with pfctl -n -v -f file
it produce
l = {1.1.1.1,1.1.1.2}
block drop inet from 1.1.1.1 to any
block drop inet from 1.1.1.2 to any
Try next your example.
Karl-Heinz
On 08.05.2009, at 12:37, Cristiano Deana
Thanks for reply...
Well, i checked that before, but also heard that 'when a system with a
mounted, encrypted virtual filesystem is shutdown uncleanly, the
encrypted virtual filesystem's structures get damaged and, since
OpenBSD's fsck command will not currently acknowledge vnd filesystems,
* Alexander Shikoff minot...@crete.org.ua [2009-05-08 13:39]:
Well, I have no any cy-like card. Why I'm getting cuac# devices in /dev ?
they are always there
There are no tty04..tty10 devices in /dev
cd /dev; sh MAKEDEV tty04
etc for the others
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de,
Hi folks,
I have some problems with 4.5 on a sun v440 used as firewall. As soon
as the traffic goes up i got a lot of status problems and the
connections became unstable (packet loss) i.e.:
May 8 10:00:04 sunv440 /bsd: cas0:
status=11389096TXEMPTY,TXDONE,RXDONE,RX_COMP_FULL,RXMAC
May 8
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 09:14:00AM +0200, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 21.45.00 Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 11:14:17AM +0200, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
I put a lot of work into azalia(4) in the last release cycel, and I'd
like to be able to say, when 4.6 release
Cem Kayali wrote:
Thanks for reply...
Well, i checked that before, but also heard that 'when a system with a
mounted, encrypted virtual filesystem is shutdown uncleanly, the
encrypted virtual filesystem's structures get damaged and, since
OpenBSD's fsck command will not currently acknowledge
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Chris Harries ch...@sharescope.co.uk wrote:
This is more of a grammar/wording question, but it does go on to the
security of OS's in general.
Was having a read of this;
http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/04/15/ibotnet-trojan.html
And the last
On 2009/05/08 14:20, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
Hi Stuart,
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 10:35:35AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-05-08, Alexander Shikoff minot...@crete.org.ua wrote:
I only have two serial ports on motherboard, I see them in dmesg:
com0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Antoine Jacoutot ajacou...@bsdfrog.org
wrote:
On Thu, 7 May 2009, Theo de Raadt wrote:
useradd really does that? A new group for every user? I think that
is stupid behaviour. But I will think about if we should this in the
script.
I agree, it is stupid
Hello,
take a look at: mount_vnd(8).
Kind regards
Christian
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 02:10:13PM +0300, Cem Kayali wrote:
Hello!
I've just registered to the list and i hope this is the right list to
ask a question about OpenBSD.
I would like to ask whether OpenBSD has stable
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Felipe Alfaro Solana
felipe.alf...@gmail.com wrote:
We could debate why OpenBSD is inherently more secure than Windows (in
fact we could debate why almost any operating system is inherently
more secure than Windows). The point here is OpenBSD is inherently
more
On 5/8/09 1:24 PM, Karl-Heinz Wild wrote:
Hi,
This seems to me not valid.
from pf.conf(5) :
Ranges of addresses are specified by using the `-' operator. For
instance: ``10.1.1.10 - 10.1.1.12'' means all addresses from 10.1.1.10
to 10.1.1.12, hence addresses 10.1.1.10, 10.1.1.11, and
But, that's also up for
debate depending on if you interpret secure to be synonymous with
secure enough or with completely secure.
I think you hit the nail on the head there :)
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
Ian Turner
Sent:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Ian Turner iturner.c...@gtalumni.org wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Felipe Alfaro Solana
felipe.alf...@gmail.com wrote:
We could debate why OpenBSD is inherently more secure than Windows (in
fact we could debate why almost any operating system is
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 01:33:28PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009/05/08 14:20, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
Hi Stuart,
cuaU# for USB serial ports, cua## for ns16x50-like devices. think those
are the only choices for serial ports at the moment.
for your puc(4) look at
Hi allWe are now busy implementing a redundancy environment using
openBSD4.5 with OpenBGPD. In this setting we use a CARP interface to
realize a failover between the primary and the secondary route-server.
With the virtual IP-address we have to admit, the failover works
perfect! But it only works
On 05/06/09 13:33, J.C. Roberts wrote:
I need to collect raw throughput statistics without increasing latency
or reducing bandwidth on 10GbE fiber links,
..
As far as my understanding allows, I believe the best way
to do this is with a physical network tap connected to monitoring
equipment.
I checkout the newest for azalia, now anything is okay,
my dmesg is:
OpenBSD 4.5 (GENERIC.MP) #1: Fri May 8 21:57:45 GMT 2009
r...@obsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T5250 @ 1.50GHz (GenuineIntel
686-class) 1.50 GHz
cpu0:
Hi,
Salvatore Sciacco schrieb:
I've also modified some sysctl params but without success:
net.inet.tcp.recvspace=262144
net.inet.tcp.sendspace=262144
net.inet.udp.recvspace=262144
net.inet.udp.sendspace=262144
Anyone have some suggestion?
I've got the same issue, but by increasing those
Hi Michael,
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Michael bele...@bsdmail.de wrote:
Salvatore Sciacco schrieb:
I've also modified some sysctl params but without success:
net.inet.tcp.recvspace=262144
net.inet.tcp.sendspace=262144
net.inet.udp.recvspace=262144
net.inet.udp.sendspace=262144
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 11:34:44AM +0100, Chris Harries wrote:
This here problem of downloading a dodgy copy of Photoshop which opens
you up for a BotNet is something that can effect all OS's.but is that
completely true? Can the same thing happen to an OpenBSD machine and
is there no way
http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/04/15/ibotnet-trojan.html
It's a *botnet* guys, installed by *trojan* i.e. by tricking the stupid idiot
at the keyboard into doing something retarded. The OS can be the most
secure thing on the planet and if the person at the keyboard is stupid
you'll
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Uwe Werler u...@o3si.de [2009-05-07 16:43]:
Hello list,
I have an OpenBSD box with 4.5 connected to two carriers, to one per dhcp and
to the other static configured.
Now I tried to change my rule set from route-to/reply-to syntax to rtable usage.
Up to now I added my
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Bob Beck b...@openbsd.org wrote:
http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/04/15/ibotnet-trojan.html
It's a *botnet* guys, installed by *trojan* i.e. by tricking the stupid
idiot
at the keyboard into doing something retarded. The OS can be the most
secure
Well, that's because you didn't get the pro version which comes with
locks and cables.
On 5/8/09, (private) HKS hks.priv...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Bob Beck b...@openbsd.org wrote:
http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/04/15/ibotnet-trojan.html
It's a *botnet*
Thanks for the tip. I was looking at the all the options and
FreeBSD/Xen looks like the best bet as far as resource throttling
goes.
Install ROCKS on the nodes, install Xen on ROCKS, install FreeBSD as
domU and give it domU a lot of priority. I'll give it a shot and
publish my findings in the
On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 05:06 -0500, Robson Caetano wrote:
Hi
I would like to log From:, To: and Subject: fields of
every SMTP connection to my internal SMTP server
that is passed by the openbsd firewall.
You're better off doing that within your MTA. Courier has a Big Brother
feature:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:17 PM, (private) HKS hks.priv...@gmail.com wrote:
Wait, so you're saying OpenBSD can't even protect me from myself?
Also I left my laptop running OpenBSD on a table at Starbucks while I
went to the bathroom and when I came back it was gone!
So much for secure by
+1 for friday laughs.
(private) HKS wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Bob Beck b...@openbsd.org wrote:
http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/04/15/ibotnet-trojan.html
It's a *botnet* guys, installed by *trojan* i.e. by tricking the stupid
idiot
at the keyboard
Today after I executed a stop on apache the machine crashed and generated a
/var/crash with:
2.0Kbounds
6.5Mbsd.0
2.0Kbsd.0.core
2.0Kminfree
I have been searching and have not found a site in regards to debug this on
OpenBSD. Could somebody shed some light?
Thank you.
Daniel
Vivek Ayer vivek.a...@gmail.com writes:
But of course, to keep it relevant, OpenBSD will run on the router and
will use hoststated http://home.nuug.no/~peter/riga2008/relayd.html. I
guess it's been renamed. I haven't paid attention. The book of PF uses
hoststated, so I guess it's already kind
Today after I executed a stop on apache the machine crashed and generated a
/var/crash with:
2.0Kbounds
6.5Mbsd.0
2.0Kbsd.0.core
2.0Kminfree
man savecore
On Fri, 08 May 2009 17:41:08 -0400
Dan un...@iseoi.com wrote:
Today after I executed a stop on apache the machine crashed and
generated a /var/crash with:
2.0Kbounds
6.5Mbsd.0
2.0Kbsd.0.core
2.0Kminfree
I have been searching and have not found a site in regards to debug
Hi,
Thanks for hints, it was helpfull and i have just created an encrypted
raid volume succesfully.
Well, could you please advise me how i can automate to run bioctl
*before* fstab entires mounted? --- so that i can push ie; /var, /usr
and swap partitions into encrypted volume?
Thanks in
Hi, Nick,
Thanks for you advices,
I clear Grub from my MBR, and flag the OpenBSD partition bootable , but I
also got a ERR M error code.
Yes, I read man biosboot, but I don't know how to resolve it.
I try to reinstall OpenBSD 4.5 again , but it is the same error :(.
2009/5/7 Nick Holland
Feifei (??) wrote:
Hi, Nick,
Thanks for you advices,
I clear Grub from my MBR, and flag the OpenBSD partition bootable , but I
also got a ERR M error code.
Yes, I read man biosboot, but I don't know how to resolve it.
I try to reinstall OpenBSD 4.5 again , but it is the same error :(.
2009/5/7
48 matches
Mail list logo
