On 21 June 2011 05:37, Samuel Baldwin recursive.for...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/www.openbsd.org
Simply openbsd.org works, however.
--
Samuel Baldwin - logik.li
openbsd.org and www.openbsd.org are two different systems see:
On 06/21/2011 06:39 AM, Philip Guenther wrote:
The market in baby mulching machines dropped out and the IPO won't be
floated, so it's all being shut down.
As long as I can still buy OpenBSD-based palestinian-baby-seeker-heads
for my bulldozers, *I'm* a happy man.
(My point it simple.
On 2011-06-21, Sean Howard sil...@callysto.com wrote:
I am also using a ProBook 4520s
I am however using OpenBSD-4.9 amd-64.
I could try to see if I can install -current, but it would take me a few days
(find time, backup again, reinstall, etc), however - I have attached my amd64
dmesg.
On 20/06/11 13:24, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
On 20/06/11 12:22, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
Trying to install latest snapshot 19-Jun-2011 I got kernel panic. SHA256
checksums verified.
Problem reported also with sendbug #6637
I've also tried to boot /bsd.sp with no luck
Tried disable ioapic
Hi all,
I've to establish a highly redundant firewall cluster with openbsd, but I got
stuck with the config.
The config:
-2 CORE0 routers ( Cisco 7xxx )
-2 FW running OpenBSD 4.9
-2 internal Cisco 3750g switches ( SW01SW02 )
Please find attached the draft of the
Hi, I have a 1TB USB disk that I want to auto mount to my OBSD 4.9
server but I needed to encrypted the disk using softraid that works but
now I can't figure out how to make the disk auto mount. Can someone help
me ?
The is where I am just now.
Pluig in disk...sd0 appears...
umass0 at
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:39:55AM +0100, keith wrote:
Hi, I have a 1TB USB disk that I want to auto mount to my OBSD 4.9
server but I needed to encrypted the disk using softraid that works
but now I can't figure out how to make the disk auto mount. Can
someone help me ?
The is where I am
Assigning one of the phys devices as vlandev to a vlan is not working. I mean,
I can assign to them, but if vlan40 is assigned to hme2 and hme2 failes, than
vlan40 will be down and hosts in vlan40 are unreacheable.
So:
ifconfig hme2 up
ifconfig hme3 up
ifconfig vlan40 create
ifconfig
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:39 AM, keith ke...@scott-land.net wrote:
Disk works fine. But if I reboot we need to issue the 'bioctl' line again
and I am not sure how to do this.
Same command as the first time. Put it in /etc/rc or /etc/rc.local or
somewhere convenient.
Hi!
I have a question about the license for bcrypt.c. The OpenBSD policy
page (http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html) says:
Berkeley rescinded the 3rd term (the advertising term) on 22 July
1999. Verbatim copies of the Berkeley license in the OpenBSD tree have
that term removed. In addition,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:23:13AM -0700, Aaron Patterson wrote:
Hi!
I have a question about the license for bcrypt.c. The OpenBSD policy
page (http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html) says:
Berkeley rescinded the 3rd term (the advertising term) on 22 July
1999. Verbatim copies of the
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 06:28:21PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:23:13AM -0700, Aaron Patterson wrote:
Hi!
I have a question about the license for bcrypt.c. The OpenBSD policy
page (http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html) says:
Berkeley rescinded the 3rd term
I have a question about the license for bcrypt.c. The OpenBSD policy
page (http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html) says:
Berkeley rescinded the 3rd term (the advertising term) on 22 July
1999. Verbatim copies of the Berkeley license in the OpenBSD tree have
that term removed.
That
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 01:34:47PM +1000, Rod Whitworth wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 18:28:10 -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:
On 06/19/11 18:19, Rod Whitworth wrote:
This popped up as the first file (in name order) when I went to see if
there was a new bunch of pkgs to go with the install iso I'm
Hello misc,
I'm trying to configure OpenBSD4.9 with Sendmail as a mail server and so far,
so good, I have a configuration with static IP, masked and with ssl support,
but I can not figure out how to implement sasl, someonehas a link where to
find information and guides on the subject?
thanks
I have just installed OpenBSD 4.9 and when i try to compile an ansi C
source file it complains about using -I- and suggest -iquote.
What is that? What does -iquote means ?
May some one help me?
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 23:24:11 +0200
gdrm g...@opensrv.org wrote:
Hello misc,
I'm trying to configure OpenBSD4.9 with Sendmail as a mail server and
so far, so good, I have a configuration with static IP, masked and
with ssl support, but I can not figure out how to implement sasl,
someonehas a
On 2011-06-21, at 4:24 PM, gdrm wrote:
Hello misc,
I'm trying to configure OpenBSD4.9 with Sendmail as a mail server and so
far,
so good, I have a configuration with static IP, masked and with ssl
support,
but I can not figure out how to implement sasl, someonehas a link where to
find
Hi Friedrich,
Friedrich Locke wrote on Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 06:42:22PM -0300:
I have just installed OpenBSD 4.9 and when i try to compile an ansi C
source file it complains about using -I- and suggest -iquote.
What is that? What does -iquote means ?
To get you started, read gcc(1) and search
SRE
22.06
Grupnipopust Srbija
===
POTREBNO JE 5 KUPONA ZA PROLAZ
UD
itajte sliku za ispravan pregled
[IMAGE]
50% popusta na tretman haloterapije u slanoj sobi Salt-art
==
za samo 300 dinara umesto 600 dinara, 20 minuta
Hi,
I'm considering migrating my desktop from Linux to OpenBSD but the
main feature that
kept me away from *BSD world for over a decade since I've first tried
FreeBSD was the
one that options must only be specified after command before any
arguments. (At least
that is true for basic commands).
vadi...@gmail.com wrote on Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 07:39:31PM -0400:
ls -l foo -h
That's ugly, useless and dangerous.
Is there an easy way to get the desired behavior on OpenBSD?
No. We don't desire it.
If you want Linux, use Linux.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:39 PM, vadi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm considering migrating my desktop from Linux to OpenBSD but the
main feature that
kept me away from *BSD world for over a decade since I've first tried
FreeBSD was the
one that options must only be specified after command
Please continue to use Linux.
That's ugly, useless and dangerous.
Oops, looks like that was a holy war type of question. Sorry I did
not want to start that.
If you want Linux, use Linux.
It's not that I want specifically Linux. I've just decided to look for
a system that cat satisfy me from
On 2011-06-22 03.03, vadi...@gmail.com wrote:
Please continue to use Linux.
That's ugly, useless and dangerous.
Oops, looks like that was a holy war type of question. Sorry I did
not want to start that.
If you want Linux, use Linux.
It's not that I want specifically Linux. I've just
It is pretty clear you are a troll.
Folks,
Is this possible and/or a good idea? I have a router with three interfaces:
sis0: external interface, IPv4 address 1.2.3.4/24
sis1: internal interface, IPv4 address 192.168.1.1/24
sis2: DMZ interface, IPv4 address 192.168.2.1/24
NAT rules pass all traffic from the internal and DMZ zones
Consider the fact that Unix have been around since the 1970's, and the
*BSD flavor is as direct a descendant of the original look, feel and
intent as you can possibly find today.
Linux is, in that regard, an abomination. It's the bastard child of
someone not properly trained in the unix way,
On 22 June 2011 11:48, Benny Lofgren bl-li...@lofgren.biz wrote:
Linux is, in that regard, an abomination. It's the bastard child of
someone not properly trained in the unix way, who made stuff up
as he went without regard for history, continuity, elegance or, for
that matter, backwards
On Jun 21, 2011, at 18:48, Benny Lofgren bl-li...@lofgren.biz wrote:
On 2011-06-22 03.03, vadi...@gmail.com wrote:
Please continue to use Linux.
That's ugly, useless and dangerous.
Oops, looks like that was a holy war type of question. Sorry I did
not want to start that.
It's not.
Linus
Sorry I really did not want to start any flame. I just thought that
getting answer from the mailing list would be faster than spending my
time studying source code of the new system.
What you should do is relearn the proper way. :-)
Ok, let me turn my question the other way around. Suppose I
Heya
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Paul Suh pl...@goodeast.com wrote:
Folks,
Is this possible and/or a good idea? I have a router with three interfaces:
sis0: external interface, IPv4 address 1.2.3.4/24
sis1: internal interface, IPv4 address 192.168.1.1/24
sis2
On Jun 21, 2011, at 20:20, vadi...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry I really did not want to start any flame. I just thought that
getting answer from the mailing list would be faster than spending my
time studying source code of the new system.
What you should do is relearn the proper way. :-)
Ok,
vadi...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry I really did not want to start any flame. I just thought that
getting answer from the mailing list would be faster than spending my
time studying source code of the new system.
What you should do is relearn the proper way. :-)
Ok, let me turn my question the
you can compile gnu coreutils
the reason posix and bsd dont allow options after operands is because
it complicates the implementation of getopt and it introduces
ambiguity, specially with options that take arguments
the gnu getopt has to look at the first characters of every argv
member unless
On 6/21/11, Johan Beisser j...@caustic.org wrote:
I use Bash and OpenBSD's ksh. In both CTRL-a gets me back to the beginning
of the line.
I use zsh in vi mode. So Esc, Shift+6, f, -, a, h (total 7 keys) or ls
-lh !!$ (total 10 keys). Just adding -h requires pressing 3 keys.
Looks like I'm too
you can compile gnu coreutils
Thank you. That sounds like a good idea. I'll try that.
If you want pleasure and usability point of view, you are
not looking in the good place. Stay with Linux.
Linux started to disappoint me to the point when I decided to try
something else.
OpenBSD has its
37 matches
Mail list logo
