Gerald Hanuer wrote:
> Hello misc@,
>
> Christian wrote:
>
> Well, the ports infrastructure for building those official binaries
> has support for putting pobj on MFS...
>
> WRKOBJDIR_MFS
> Alternate location for the port working directory. The intent
> is
> to
> > Christian wrote:
> >
> > Well, the ports infrastructure for building those official binaries
> > has support for putting pobj on MFS...
> >
> > WRKOBJDIR_MFS
> > Alternate location for the port working directory. The intent
> > is
> > to use an MFS based
I am looking for a form printer. (The kind that take the paper with
the holes on the side.) New ones are a little on the pricey side, so
if anyone can share their experience with a make/model that works with
little fuss. Preferably with lpd, but I'm not completely opposed to using
cupsd. Any
On 05/29/16 21:53, Maurice Janssen wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to replace a PC Engines Alix board with an APU 2c4 board,
but I'm having some issues to get it up and running.
I have a fiber connection and my ISP requires a PPPoE connection over
VLAN 6.
With the old setup, this works like a charm.
> Hello misc@,
>
> Theo wrote:
>
> I still don't see the use case.
>
> wxallowed is only meant as a temporary[1] measure until all the
> applications are fixed.
>
> Instead, you are trying to use all the features everywhere.
>
> [1] Hopefully within my lifetime
>
>
> Have mfs in the tool
Hello misc@,
Christian wrote:
Well, the ports infrastructure for building those official binaries
has support for putting pobj on MFS...
WRKOBJDIR_MFS
Alternate location for the port working directory. The intent
is
to use an MFS based filesystem for small ports
Hello misc@,
Theo wrote:
I still don't see the use case.
wxallowed is only meant as a temporary[1] measure until all the
applications are fixed.
Instead, you are trying to use all the features everywhere.
[1] Hopefully within my lifetime
Have mfs in the tool kit to take up the read/write
On 2016-05-30, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Well, you are also going to find out you cannot set wxallowed
> on some other filesystems. It only works on real FFS and real
> NFS, and the purpose is for building & installation of official
> binaries.
>
> The goal is that admins
Has anyone tried a ViewSonic thin client?
> On May 26, 2016, at 7:40 AM, Marko Cupać wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I need to implement a few dozen boxes whose only purpose will be
> connecting to RDP servers. I have figured out the software part -
> OpenBSD + slim + openbox +
> >>85c260a91247e685.b none swap sw
> >>85c260a91247e685.a / ffs rw 1 1
> >>85c260a91247e685.k /home ffs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2
> >>85c260a91247e685.d /tmp ffs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2
> >>85c260a91247e685.f /usr ffs rw,nodev 1 2
> >>85c260a91247e685.g /usr/X11R6 ffs rw,nodev 1 2
>
Hello misc@,
>>85c260a91247e685.b none swap sw
>>85c260a91247e685.a / ffs rw 1 1
>>85c260a91247e685.k /home ffs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2
>>85c260a91247e685.d /tmp ffs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2
>>85c260a91247e685.f /usr ffs rw,nodev 1 2
>>85c260a91247e685.g /usr/X11R6 ffs rw,nodev 1 2
> >Well, you are also going to find out you cannot set wxallowed
> >on some other filesystems. It only works on real FFS and real
> >NFS, and the purpose is for building & installation of official
> >binaries.
>
> >The goal is that admins won't create filesystems like you are
> >doing here.
>
>
Hello misc@,
>Well, you are also going to find out you cannot set wxallowed
>on some other filesystems. It only works on real FFS and real
>NFS, and the purpose is for building & installation of official
>binaries.
>The goal is that admins won't create filesystems like you are
>doing here.
Well, you are also going to find out you cannot set wxallowed
on some other filesystems. It only works on real FFS and real
NFS, and the purpose is for building & installation of official
binaries.
The goal is that admins won't create filesystems like you are
doing here.
Why are you doing this?
Hello misc@,
Mount_mfs does not honor wxallowed.
Will mfs follow ffs regarding wxallowed,
if so is this functionality in the works?
Thanks in advanced,
Gerald Hanuer
/bin/cat /etc/fstab
85c260a91247e685.b none swap sw
85c260a91247e685.a / ffs rw 1 1
85c260a91247e685.k /home ffs
Sebastian Reitenbach l00-bugdead-prods.de> writes:
> With tcpdump, I see 'pri 0' on all the packets captured:
>
> tcpdump -n -i trunk0 -vvv vlan 8 and net 10.1.0.0/24
> 11:18:13.132570 802.1Q vid 8 pri 0 10.1.0.2 > 10.1.0.1: icmp: echo reply
> (id:6221 seq:0) [icmp cksum ok] (ttl 64, id 11179,
> Switching from Alix with vr(4) to APU2 with em(4) should not affect
this.
Some people claim that ISP may use MAC for some kind of login. I'm not
sure, but maybe he can verify by MAC clonning.
0
C Russian Federation
P
T Moscow
Z 109004
O Infosecurity LLC
I Artem Vydrin /Pavel Kondratyuk
A Nikoloyamskaya 38/1
M u...@infosecservice.ru
U http://www.gk-is.ru/services
B +7 495 510 15 86
X
N Commercial support for Unix/Linux. Security sevices setup and integration.
Experienced in
Hi Indunil,
On 2016-05-30 Mon 08:47 AM |, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
>
> Waiting your INPUTS.
>
There is an SPF help mailing list, see http://www.OpenSPF.Org/Forums
Most of your questions can be answered from http://www.OpenSPF.Org/
*) FAQ
*) Best Practices
*) Record Syntax
*) testing tools
On 2016-05-30, Daniel Gillen wrote:
>> I'm trying to replace a PC Engines Alix board with an APU 2c4 board, but
>> I'm having some issues to get it up and running.
>> I have a fiber connection and my ISP requires a PPPoE connection over
>> VLAN 6.
> I have a similar
On Sat, 28 May 2016 20:24:00 +0800
Teng Zhang wrote:
> I can't adjust the time for OpenBSD and my life appropriately. Could
> you please share your experience with me about how you adjust your
> time between OpenBSD and your life.
> thanks for any reply.
>
Strange, when
Hi,
I tried to get priority queueing set up to prioritize some
VoIP traffic. I'm on 5.9, a carp clustered firewall.
Just some testing so far, but I got a bit confused, about
whether it is really doing what it is supposed to do.
pf.conf(5) tells me about 'set prio':
If the packet is
On 2016-05-29, Murk Fletcher wrote:
> % git clone https://github.com/openbsd/openbsd.git
I don't know what you're trying to do here..
> and pf.conf:
> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/69e047797f696c1df8eaa0c82e39e01d
| ext_if = "vtnet0"
What is vtnet0?
> You had obviously tested without any of your own PF rules?
You're right, something must have changed from 5.8 to 5.9 to cause my
ruleset to do bananas. Being a local VirtualBox development machine, I
reckon I don't need a ruleset at all?
Many thanks!
--Murk
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 8:53 AM,
Obviouisly it doesn't a ruleset. What was I thinking.
Have a good one guys!
--Murk
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Murk Fletcher
wrote:
> > You had obviously tested without any of your own PF rules?
>
> You're right, something must have changed from 5.8 to 5.9 to
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 11:01:14PM BST, Murk Fletcher wrote:
This:
> This is my Windows 10 VirtualBox set to Bridged Networking.
and this:
> It's been working flawlessly for years.
is a direct contradiction.
> I recently upgraded to OpenBSD 5.9, I think that's when the problems started.
Hi all,
first boot of OpenBSD amd64 snapshot on Oracle VM for x86 version 3.2.8
after install
OpenBSD 6.0-beta (GENERIC) #1976: Sat May 28 19:35:41 MDT 2016
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC
real mem = 520093696 (496MB)
avail mem = 499953664 (476MB)
mpath0
27 matches
Mail list logo